Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

A Comparison of Cardiac Computed Tomography, Transesophageal and Intracardiac Echocardiography, and Fluoroscopy for Planning Left Atrial Appendage Closure

P. Osmancik, D. Herman, H. Linkova, M. Hozman, M. Labos

. 2021 ; 13 (6) : 20200449. [pub] 20210430

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22001769

Background: Left atrial appendage (LAA) closure (LAAC) is accompanied by a high risk of complications. Due to the complex anatomy of the LAA and the oval-shaped ostium, the proper sizing of the device is often difficult. Purpose: To assess individualized fluoroscopy viewing angles using pre-procedural CT analysis and to compare the results of landing zone measurements obtained from CT, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), intracardiac echocardiography (ICE), and fluoroscopy. Methods: Patients with indications for LAAC were enrolled. Cardiac CT and TEE were done before the procedure; ICE and fluoroscopy measurements were done peri-procedurally. Multiplanar reconstruction of CT images, using FluoroCT software, was done, and optimal "personalized" viewing angles for fluoroscopy were determined. Moreover, a mean (using multiplanar CT reconstruction, derived from the LAA perimetr) amd maximum (using all four imaging modalitities) landing zone (LZ) of the LAA were masured. Results: Twenty-five patients were analyzed. Despite significant correlation between LZs obtained from different imaging modalities, the values of LZs differed significantly; the mean LZ diameter on CT was 20.60 ± 3.42 mm, the maximum diameters were 21.99 ± 4.03 mm (CT), 18.72 ± 2.44 mm (TEE), 18.20 ± 2.68 mm (ICE), and 17.76 ± 3.24 mm (fluoroscopy). The mean CT diameter matched with the final device selection in 92% patients, while fluoroscopy or TEE maximum diameters in only 72% patients. Optimal viewing angles differed significantly from the fluoroscopy projections usually recommended by the manufacturer in 3 patients. Conclusions: CT provides the best measurement of the LZ and the best prediction of the optimum fluoroscopy projections for the implantation procedure.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22001769
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220112153715.0
007      
ta
008      
220107s2021 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.4022/jafib.20200449 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)34950349
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Osmancik, Pavel $u Cardiocenter, Dept. of cardiology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague, and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
245    12
$a A Comparison of Cardiac Computed Tomography, Transesophageal and Intracardiac Echocardiography, and Fluoroscopy for Planning Left Atrial Appendage Closure / $c P. Osmancik, D. Herman, H. Linkova, M. Hozman, M. Labos
520    9_
$a Background: Left atrial appendage (LAA) closure (LAAC) is accompanied by a high risk of complications. Due to the complex anatomy of the LAA and the oval-shaped ostium, the proper sizing of the device is often difficult. Purpose: To assess individualized fluoroscopy viewing angles using pre-procedural CT analysis and to compare the results of landing zone measurements obtained from CT, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), intracardiac echocardiography (ICE), and fluoroscopy. Methods: Patients with indications for LAAC were enrolled. Cardiac CT and TEE were done before the procedure; ICE and fluoroscopy measurements were done peri-procedurally. Multiplanar reconstruction of CT images, using FluoroCT software, was done, and optimal "personalized" viewing angles for fluoroscopy were determined. Moreover, a mean (using multiplanar CT reconstruction, derived from the LAA perimetr) amd maximum (using all four imaging modalitities) landing zone (LZ) of the LAA were masured. Results: Twenty-five patients were analyzed. Despite significant correlation between LZs obtained from different imaging modalities, the values of LZs differed significantly; the mean LZ diameter on CT was 20.60 ± 3.42 mm, the maximum diameters were 21.99 ± 4.03 mm (CT), 18.72 ± 2.44 mm (TEE), 18.20 ± 2.68 mm (ICE), and 17.76 ± 3.24 mm (fluoroscopy). The mean CT diameter matched with the final device selection in 92% patients, while fluoroscopy or TEE maximum diameters in only 72% patients. Optimal viewing angles differed significantly from the fluoroscopy projections usually recommended by the manufacturer in 3 patients. Conclusions: CT provides the best measurement of the LZ and the best prediction of the optimum fluoroscopy projections for the implantation procedure.
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Herman, Dalibor $u Cardiocenter, Dept. of cardiology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague, and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Linkova, Hana $u Cardiocenter, Dept. of cardiology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague, and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic $u Cardiocenter, Karlovy Vary Regional Hospital, Karlovy Vary, Czech Republic $u Dept. of Radiology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague, and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Hozman, Marek $u Cardiocenter, Karlovy Vary Regional Hospital, Karlovy Vary, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Labos, Marek $u Dept. of Radiology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague, and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00165295 $t Journal of atrial fibrillation $x 1941-6911 $g Roč. 13, č. 6 (2021), s. 20200449
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34950349 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20220107 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220112153711 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ind $b bmc $g 1745612 $s 1152916
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 13 $c 6 $d 20200449 $e 20210430 $i 1941-6911 $m Journal of atrial fibrillation $n J Atr Fibrillation $x MED00165295
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220107

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...