-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Mental Health and Quality & Safety of Care in Czech Residential Institutions during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Methods Study
Z. Guerrero, AA. Aliev, L. Kondrátová, B. Jozefiaková, N. Nesázalová, JG. Saňáková, P. Winkler
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
Grantová podpora
grant LO1611
Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy
NLK
ProQuest Central
od 1997-03-01 do Před 1 rokem
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 1997-03-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 1997-03-01 do Před 1 rokem
- MeSH
- bezpečnost pacientů * MeSH
- COVID-19 * epidemiologie psychologie MeSH
- deprese epidemiologie MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- duševní poruchy * epidemiologie MeSH
- kvalita zdravotní péče * MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- pandemie * MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ubytovací zařízení MeSH
- úzkost epidemiologie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
Long-stay institutions have been considerably affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to assess the mental health of clients and staff as well as quality and safety of care in long-stay institutions during the state-of-emergency in the Czech Republic in response to COVID-19 pandemic. We found a high prevalence of poor mental health outcomes in clients (46% poor well-being, 58% depression, 45% anxiety) and staff (17% poor well-being, 22% depression, 14% anxiety). In clients, COVID-19 health-related and economic worries were associated with depression (1.79, 95% CI = 1.14; 2.8 and 2.28, 95% CI = 1.27; 4.08 respectively) and anxiety (1.63, 95% CI = 1.11; 2.4 and 1.85, 95% CI = 1.2; 2.85 respectively) and in staff with any mental health outcome (1.92, 95% CI = 1.33; 2.77 and 1.75, 95% CI = 1.15; 2.66 respectively). Lack of information and communication from authorities, lack of protective equipment and logistic difficulties were reported as challenges. Delivery of care was mostly disrupted as well as admission and discharge processes. Other reported issues included lack of staff, lack of activities for patients or an increase in usage of restrictive measures. Best practices and key future measures were identified by each institution, a summary of which is presented in the article.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22003135
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240618115557.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220113s2021 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s11126-021-09912-z $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)33821407
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Guerrero, Zoe $u Department of Public Mental Health, National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová 748, 250 67, Klecany, Czech Republic $7 xx0318581
- 245 10
- $a Mental Health and Quality & Safety of Care in Czech Residential Institutions during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Methods Study / $c Z. Guerrero, AA. Aliev, L. Kondrátová, B. Jozefiaková, N. Nesázalová, JG. Saňáková, P. Winkler
- 520 9_
- $a Long-stay institutions have been considerably affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to assess the mental health of clients and staff as well as quality and safety of care in long-stay institutions during the state-of-emergency in the Czech Republic in response to COVID-19 pandemic. We found a high prevalence of poor mental health outcomes in clients (46% poor well-being, 58% depression, 45% anxiety) and staff (17% poor well-being, 22% depression, 14% anxiety). In clients, COVID-19 health-related and economic worries were associated with depression (1.79, 95% CI = 1.14; 2.8 and 2.28, 95% CI = 1.27; 4.08 respectively) and anxiety (1.63, 95% CI = 1.11; 2.4 and 1.85, 95% CI = 1.2; 2.85 respectively) and in staff with any mental health outcome (1.92, 95% CI = 1.33; 2.77 and 1.75, 95% CI = 1.15; 2.66 respectively). Lack of information and communication from authorities, lack of protective equipment and logistic difficulties were reported as challenges. Delivery of care was mostly disrupted as well as admission and discharge processes. Other reported issues included lack of staff, lack of activities for patients or an increase in usage of restrictive measures. Best practices and key future measures were identified by each institution, a summary of which is presented in the article.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a úzkost $x epidemiologie $7 D001007
- 650 12
- $a COVID-19 $x epidemiologie $x psychologie $7 D000086382
- 650 _2
- $a deprese $x epidemiologie $7 D003863
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 12
- $a duševní poruchy $x epidemiologie $7 D001523
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 12
- $a pandemie $7 D058873
- 650 12
- $a bezpečnost pacientů $7 D061214
- 650 12
- $a kvalita zdravotní péče $7 D011787
- 650 _2
- $a ubytovací zařízení $7 D012112
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 651 _2
- $a Česká republika $x epidemiologie $7 D018153
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Aliev, Akmal-Alikhan $u Department of Public Mental Health, National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová 748, 250 67, Klecany, Czech Republic. Akmal.aliev@hotmail.com
- 700 1_
- $a Kondrátová, Lucie $u Department of Public Mental Health, National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová 748, 250 67, Klecany, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Jozefiaková, Bibiána $u Department of Public Mental Health, National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová 748, 250 67, Klecany, Czech Republic $u Social Health Institute, Palacky University, Univerzitní 22, 771 11, Olomouc, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Nesázalová, Natálie $u Department of Public Mental Health, National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová 748, 250 67, Klecany, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Saňáková, Josephine Gabriela $u Department of Public Mental Health, National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová 748, 250 67, Klecany, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Winkler, Petr $u Department of Public Mental Health, National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová 748, 250 67, Klecany, Czech Republic $u Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK
- 773 0_
- $w MED00007827 $t Psychiatric quarterly $x 1573-6709 $g Roč. 92, č. 4 (2021), s. 1393-1411
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33821407 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220113 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240618115558 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1750790 $s 1154284
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 92 $c 4 $d 1393-1411 $e 20210405 $i 1573-6709 $m Psychiatric quarterly $n Psychiatr Q $x MED00007827
- GRA __
- $a grant LO1611 $p Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20220113