Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Low resistance but high resilience to drought of flushing Norway spruce seedlings

M. Hájíčková, R. Plichta, J. Urban, D. Volařík, R. Gebauer

. 2021 ; 41 (10) : 1848-1860. [pub] 20211004

Language English Country Canada

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Spring drought episodes are becoming more frequent and intensive in European temperate forests. To study tree resilience to spring drought, Norway spruce seedlings were exposed to three levels of drought stress (well-watered (W), moderately stressed (M) and severely stressed (S)) for 42 days and then fully irrigated for 14 days. Drought strongly reduced gas exchange parameters for both M and S seedlings. After 42 days, stomatal conductance was lower by 83 and 97% in M and S, respectively, than in W seedlings. Respiration prevailed over photosynthesis in S seedlings at the end of the drought period. Drought mostly reduced longitudinal growth, especially in shoots and needles. Xylem growth reduction was caused mainly by a lower number of newly produced tracheids, not by changes in their size. Norway spruce seedlings showed good resilience to spring drought, as the observed physiological parameters started to recover after rewatering and seedlings started to sprout and form new tracheids. In M seedlings, all physiological traits recovered to the level of W seedlings during the 14-day irrigation period but the recovery took longer in S seedlings. Shoots and needles did not regrow in length but leaf mass per area increased during the recovery phase. To conclude, Norway spruce seedlings showed good resilience to spring single-drought event, but time necessary to full recovery from stress could make seedlings more vulnerable to recurrent drought events.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22003510
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220127150144.0
007      
ta
008      
220113s2021 xxc f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1093/treephys/tpab043 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)33822237
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxc
100    1_
$a Hájíčková, Martina $u Department of Forest Botany, Dendrology and Geobiocoenology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 3, 61300 Brno, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Low resistance but high resilience to drought of flushing Norway spruce seedlings / $c M. Hájíčková, R. Plichta, J. Urban, D. Volařík, R. Gebauer
520    9_
$a Spring drought episodes are becoming more frequent and intensive in European temperate forests. To study tree resilience to spring drought, Norway spruce seedlings were exposed to three levels of drought stress (well-watered (W), moderately stressed (M) and severely stressed (S)) for 42 days and then fully irrigated for 14 days. Drought strongly reduced gas exchange parameters for both M and S seedlings. After 42 days, stomatal conductance was lower by 83 and 97% in M and S, respectively, than in W seedlings. Respiration prevailed over photosynthesis in S seedlings at the end of the drought period. Drought mostly reduced longitudinal growth, especially in shoots and needles. Xylem growth reduction was caused mainly by a lower number of newly produced tracheids, not by changes in their size. Norway spruce seedlings showed good resilience to spring drought, as the observed physiological parameters started to recover after rewatering and seedlings started to sprout and form new tracheids. In M seedlings, all physiological traits recovered to the level of W seedlings during the 14-day irrigation period but the recovery took longer in S seedlings. Shoots and needles did not regrow in length but leaf mass per area increased during the recovery phase. To conclude, Norway spruce seedlings showed good resilience to spring single-drought event, but time necessary to full recovery from stress could make seedlings more vulnerable to recurrent drought events.
650    12
$a období sucha $7 D055864
650    _2
$a fotosyntéza $7 D010788
650    12
$a smrk $7 D028222
650    _2
$a semenáček $7 D036226
650    _2
$a voda $7 D014867
650    _2
$a xylém $7 D052584
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Plichta, Roman $u Department of Forest Botany, Dendrology and Geobiocoenology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 3, 61300 Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Urban, Josef $u Department of Forest Botany, Dendrology and Geobiocoenology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 3, 61300 Brno, Czech Republic $u Siberian Federal University, Svobodnyy Ave, 82A, 660041 Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk Krai, Russia
700    1_
$a Volařík, Daniel $u Department of Forest Botany, Dendrology and Geobiocoenology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 3, 61300 Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Gebauer, Roman $u Department of Forest Botany, Dendrology and Geobiocoenology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 3, 61300 Brno, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00181097 $t Tree physiology $x 1758-4469 $g Roč. 41, č. 10 (2021), s. 1848-1860
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33822237 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20220113 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220127150140 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1751072 $s 1154659
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 41 $c 10 $d 1848-1860 $e 20211004 $i 1758-4469 $m Tree physiology $n Tree physiol. $x MED00181097
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220113

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...