-
Something wrong with this record ?
The Abbreviated Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS) and the Abbreviated Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale (ODSIS): Psychometric Properties and Evaluation of the Czech Versions
J. Sandora, L. Novak, R. Brnka, JP. van Dijk, P. Tavel, K. Malinakova
Language English Country Switzerland
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Grant support
19-19526S
Grantová Agentura České Republiky
IGA-CMTF-2021-005
the Sts. Cyril and Methodius Faculty of Theology of Palacký University Olomouc, Czech republic
NLK
Free Medical Journals
from 2004
PubMed Central
from 2005
Europe PubMed Central
from 2005
ProQuest Central
from 2009-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2004-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2005-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2008-12-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2009-01-01
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2009-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2004
- MeSH
- Depression * diagnosis epidemiology MeSH
- Factor Analysis, Statistical MeSH
- Language * MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Surveys and Questionnaires MeSH
- Psychometrics MeSH
- Reproducibility of Results MeSH
- Anxiety diagnosis epidemiology MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Geographicals
- Czech Republic MeSH
Short and effective tools for measuring depression, anxiety and their resulting impairments are lacking in the Czech language. The abbreviated versions of the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS) and the Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale (ODSIS) show very good psychometric properties in English and other languages, and can be used in different settings for research or clinical purposes. The aim of this study was the psychometric evaluation and validation of the Czech versions of the abbreviated forms of both tools in the general population. A nationally representative sample of 2912 participants (age = 48.88, SD = 15.56; 55% female) was used. The non-parametric testing of the differences between sociodemographic groups revealed a higher level of anxiety and depression in students, females and religious respondents. Confirmatory Factor Analysis suggested a good fit for the unidimensional model of the OASIS: x2(4) = 38.28; p < 0.001; TLI = 0.999; CFI = 0.997; RMSEA = 0.078; SRMR = 0.027 and the ODSIS: x2(4) = 36.54; p < 0.001; TLI = 0.999; CFI = 0.999; RMSEA = 0.076; SRMR = 0.021 with the data. Both scales had an excellent internal consistency (OASIS: Cronbach's alpha = 0.95, McDonald's omega = 0.95 and ODSIS: Cronbach's alpha = 0.95, McDonald's omega = 0.95). A clinical cut-off of 15 was identified for the OASIS and a cut-off of 12 for the ODSIS. The study showed good validity for both scales. The Czech versions of the abbreviated OASIS and ODSIS were short and valid instruments for measuring anxiety and depression.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22003649
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220127150031.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220113s2021 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3390/ijerph181910337 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)34639633
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Sandora, Jan $u Olomouc University Social Health Institute, Palacky University Olomouc, 771 11 Olomouc, Czech Republic
- 245 14
- $a The Abbreviated Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS) and the Abbreviated Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale (ODSIS): Psychometric Properties and Evaluation of the Czech Versions / $c J. Sandora, L. Novak, R. Brnka, JP. van Dijk, P. Tavel, K. Malinakova
- 520 9_
- $a Short and effective tools for measuring depression, anxiety and their resulting impairments are lacking in the Czech language. The abbreviated versions of the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS) and the Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale (ODSIS) show very good psychometric properties in English and other languages, and can be used in different settings for research or clinical purposes. The aim of this study was the psychometric evaluation and validation of the Czech versions of the abbreviated forms of both tools in the general population. A nationally representative sample of 2912 participants (age = 48.88, SD = 15.56; 55% female) was used. The non-parametric testing of the differences between sociodemographic groups revealed a higher level of anxiety and depression in students, females and religious respondents. Confirmatory Factor Analysis suggested a good fit for the unidimensional model of the OASIS: x2(4) = 38.28; p < 0.001; TLI = 0.999; CFI = 0.997; RMSEA = 0.078; SRMR = 0.027 and the ODSIS: x2(4) = 36.54; p < 0.001; TLI = 0.999; CFI = 0.999; RMSEA = 0.076; SRMR = 0.021 with the data. Both scales had an excellent internal consistency (OASIS: Cronbach's alpha = 0.95, McDonald's omega = 0.95 and ODSIS: Cronbach's alpha = 0.95, McDonald's omega = 0.95). A clinical cut-off of 15 was identified for the OASIS and a cut-off of 12 for the ODSIS. The study showed good validity for both scales. The Czech versions of the abbreviated OASIS and ODSIS were short and valid instruments for measuring anxiety and depression.
- 650 _2
- $a úzkost $x diagnóza $x epidemiologie $7 D001007
- 650 12
- $a deprese $x diagnóza $x epidemiologie $7 D003863
- 650 _2
- $a faktorová analýza statistická $7 D005163
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a jazyk (prostředek komunikace) $7 D007802
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a psychometrie $7 D011594
- 650 _2
- $a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
- 650 _2
- $a průzkumy a dotazníky $7 D011795
- 651 _2
- $a Česká republika $x epidemiologie $7 D018153
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Novak, Lukas $u Olomouc University Social Health Institute, Palacky University Olomouc, 771 11 Olomouc, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Brnka, Robert $u Olomouc University Social Health Institute, Palacky University Olomouc, 771 11 Olomouc, Czech Republic $u First Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University Bratislava, 813 72 Bratislava, Slovakia
- 700 1_
- $a van Dijk, Jitse P $u Olomouc University Social Health Institute, Palacky University Olomouc, 771 11 Olomouc, Czech Republic $u Department of Community and Occupational Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 AV Groningen, The Netherlands $u Graduate School Kosice Institute for Society and Health, P.J. Safarik University in Kosice, 040 11 Kosice, Slovakia
- 700 1_
- $a Tavel, Peter $u Olomouc University Social Health Institute, Palacky University Olomouc, 771 11 Olomouc, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Malinakova, Klara $u Olomouc University Social Health Institute, Palacky University Olomouc, 771 11 Olomouc, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00176090 $t International journal of environmental research and public health $x 1660-4601 $g Roč. 18, č. 19 (2021)
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34639633 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220113 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220127150027 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1751189 $s 1154798
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 18 $c 19 $e 20210930 $i 1660-4601 $m International journal of environmental research and public health $n Int. j. environ. res. public health $x MED00176090
- GRA __
- $a 19-19526S $p Grantová Agentura České Republiky
- GRA __
- $a IGA-CMTF-2021-005 $p the Sts. Cyril and Methodius Faculty of Theology of Palacký University Olomouc, Czech republic
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20220113
