Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Influence of heart rate correction formulas on QTc interval stability

I. Andršová, K. Hnatkova, M. Šišáková, O. Toman, P. Smetana, KM. Huster, P. Barthel, T. Novotný, G. Schmidt, M. Malik

. 2021 ; 11 (1) : 14269. [pub] 20210712

Language English Country Great Britain

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Grant support
NH/16/2/32499 British Heart Foundation - United Kingdom

Monitoring of QTc interval is mandated in different clinical conditions. Nevertheless, intra-subject variability of QTc intervals reduces the clinical utility of QTc monitoring strategies. Since this variability is partly related to QT heart rate correction, 10 different heart rate corrections (Bazett, Fridericia, Dmitrienko, Framingham, Schlamowitz, Hodges, Ashman, Rautaharju, Sarma, and Rabkin) were applied to 452,440 ECG measurements made in 539 healthy volunteers (259 females, mean age 33.3 ± 8.4 years). For each correction formula, the short term (5-min time-points) and long-term (day-time hours) variability of rate corrected QT values (QTc) was investigated together with the comparisons of the QTc values with individually corrected QTcI values obtained by subject-specific modelling of the QT/RR relationship and hysteresis. The results showed that (a) both in terms of short-term and long-term QTc variability, Bazett correction led to QTc values that were more variable than the results of other corrections (p < 0.00001 for all), (b) the QTc variability by Fridericia and Framingham corrections were not systematically different from each other but were lower than the results of other corrections (p-value between 0.033 and < 0.00001), and (c) on average, Bazett QTc values departed from QTcI intervals more than the QTc values of other corrections. The study concludes that (a) previous suggestions that Bazett correction should no longer be used in clinical practice are fully justified, (b) replacing Bazett correction with Fridericia and/or Framingham corrections would improve clinical QTc monitoring, (c) heart rate stability is needed for valid QTc assessment, and (d) development of further QTc corrections for day-to-day use is not warranted.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22004091
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220127145553.0
007      
ta
008      
220113s2021 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1038/s41598-021-93774-9 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)34253795
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Andršová, Irena $u Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Brno, Masaryk University, Jihlavská 20, 625 00, Brno, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Influence of heart rate correction formulas on QTc interval stability / $c I. Andršová, K. Hnatkova, M. Šišáková, O. Toman, P. Smetana, KM. Huster, P. Barthel, T. Novotný, G. Schmidt, M. Malik
520    9_
$a Monitoring of QTc interval is mandated in different clinical conditions. Nevertheless, intra-subject variability of QTc intervals reduces the clinical utility of QTc monitoring strategies. Since this variability is partly related to QT heart rate correction, 10 different heart rate corrections (Bazett, Fridericia, Dmitrienko, Framingham, Schlamowitz, Hodges, Ashman, Rautaharju, Sarma, and Rabkin) were applied to 452,440 ECG measurements made in 539 healthy volunteers (259 females, mean age 33.3 ± 8.4 years). For each correction formula, the short term (5-min time-points) and long-term (day-time hours) variability of rate corrected QT values (QTc) was investigated together with the comparisons of the QTc values with individually corrected QTcI values obtained by subject-specific modelling of the QT/RR relationship and hysteresis. The results showed that (a) both in terms of short-term and long-term QTc variability, Bazett correction led to QTc values that were more variable than the results of other corrections (p < 0.00001 for all), (b) the QTc variability by Fridericia and Framingham corrections were not systematically different from each other but were lower than the results of other corrections (p-value between 0.033 and < 0.00001), and (c) on average, Bazett QTc values departed from QTcI intervals more than the QTc values of other corrections. The study concludes that (a) previous suggestions that Bazett correction should no longer be used in clinical practice are fully justified, (b) replacing Bazett correction with Fridericia and/or Framingham corrections would improve clinical QTc monitoring, (c) heart rate stability is needed for valid QTc assessment, and (d) development of further QTc corrections for day-to-day use is not warranted.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a algoritmy $7 D000465
650    _2
$a kardiologie $x metody $x normy $7 D002309
650    _2
$a elektrokardiografie $x metody $7 D004562
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a srdeční frekvence $x fyziologie $7 D006339
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a syndrom dlouhého QT $x diagnóza $x patofyziologie $7 D008133
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
650    _2
$a počítačové zpracování signálu $7 D012815
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Hnatkova, Katerina $u National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, ICTEM, Hammersmith Campus, 72 Du Cane Rd, Shepherd's Bush, London, W12 0NN, England, UK
700    1_
$a Šišáková, Martina $u Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Brno, Masaryk University, Jihlavská 20, 625 00, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Toman, Ondřej $u Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Brno, Masaryk University, Jihlavská 20, 625 00, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Smetana, Peter $u Wilhelminenspital der Stadt Wien, Montleartstraße 37, 1160, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Huster, Katharina M $u Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
700    1_
$a Barthel, Petra $u Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
700    1_
$a Novotný, Tomáš $u Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Brno, Masaryk University, Jihlavská 20, 625 00, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Schmidt, Georg $u Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
700    1_
$a Malik, Marek $u National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, ICTEM, Hammersmith Campus, 72 Du Cane Rd, Shepherd's Bush, London, W12 0NN, England, UK. marek.malik@imperial.ac.uk $u Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Jihlavská 20, 625 00, Brno, Czech Republic. marek.malik@imperial.ac.uk
773    0_
$w MED00182195 $t Scientific reports $x 2045-2322 $g Roč. 11, č. 1 (2021), s. 14269
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34253795 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20220113 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220127145549 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1751525 $s 1155240
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 11 $c 1 $d 14269 $e 20210712 $i 2045-2322 $m Scientific reports $n Sci Rep $x MED00182195
GRA    __
$a NH/16/2/32499 $p British Heart Foundation $2 United Kingdom
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220113

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...