• Something wrong with this record ?

Perfusion of a Kidney Graft from a Donor After Cardiac Death Based on Immediately Started Machine Perfusion: An Experimental Study on a Big Animal

V. Opatrný, V. Třeška, J. Zeithaml, O. Hes, R. Matějka, J. Moláček

. 2021 ; 53 (6) : 2082-2090. [pub] 20210715

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article

Persistent link   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22004167

BACKGROUND: Donation after circulatory death donors are becoming a common source of organs for transplant. Despite good long-term outcomes of grafts from donation after circulatory death, this group is affected by a higher occurrence of delayed graft function and primary nonfunction. Our hypothesis is based on the assumption that washing the kidney grafts in the donor's body using a simple mechanical perfusion pump will result in faster and better perfusion of the parenchyma and more efficient cooling compared with hydrostatic perfusion alone. METHODS: A total of 7 experimental animals (pigs) were used. The animals were divided into 2 groups: group A (n = 3) and group B (n = 4). After a 30-minute ischemic period for the selected kidney (clamped renal vessels), intra-arterial perfusion was performed. In group A perfusion was performed using hydrostatic pressure; in group B mechanical controlled perfusion was performed. After perfusion, declamping of the renal vessels caused restoration of flow. For graft quality evaluation, biopsy specimens were harvested, and the cooling speed was observed. Laboratory markers or renal failure were determined. RESULTS: We found no significant differences between temperature drop and total diuresis between groups A and B. A significant difference was found between the groups in both flow parameters (flow maximum and mean flow) (P = .007, respectively P = .019). No laboratory parameters were found to be statistically significantly different. Histopathological analysis strongly supports the hypothesis of better flushing of kidney grafts using mechanical perfusion. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our results, better kidney graft quality can be expected after immediately started mechanical perfusion in situ.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22004167
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220127145452.0
007      
ta
008      
220113s2021 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.transproceed.2021.06.026 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)34274120
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Opatrný, Václav $u Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Department of Surgery, Charles University, University Hospital in Plzen, Plzen, Czech Republic; Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Transplantcentrum, Charles University, University Hospital in Plzen, Plzen, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Perfusion of a Kidney Graft from a Donor After Cardiac Death Based on Immediately Started Machine Perfusion: An Experimental Study on a Big Animal / $c V. Opatrný, V. Třeška, J. Zeithaml, O. Hes, R. Matějka, J. Moláček
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Donation after circulatory death donors are becoming a common source of organs for transplant. Despite good long-term outcomes of grafts from donation after circulatory death, this group is affected by a higher occurrence of delayed graft function and primary nonfunction. Our hypothesis is based on the assumption that washing the kidney grafts in the donor's body using a simple mechanical perfusion pump will result in faster and better perfusion of the parenchyma and more efficient cooling compared with hydrostatic perfusion alone. METHODS: A total of 7 experimental animals (pigs) were used. The animals were divided into 2 groups: group A (n = 3) and group B (n = 4). After a 30-minute ischemic period for the selected kidney (clamped renal vessels), intra-arterial perfusion was performed. In group A perfusion was performed using hydrostatic pressure; in group B mechanical controlled perfusion was performed. After perfusion, declamping of the renal vessels caused restoration of flow. For graft quality evaluation, biopsy specimens were harvested, and the cooling speed was observed. Laboratory markers or renal failure were determined. RESULTS: We found no significant differences between temperature drop and total diuresis between groups A and B. A significant difference was found between the groups in both flow parameters (flow maximum and mean flow) (P = .007, respectively P = .019). No laboratory parameters were found to be statistically significantly different. Histopathological analysis strongly supports the hypothesis of better flushing of kidney grafts using mechanical perfusion. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our results, better kidney graft quality can be expected after immediately started mechanical perfusion in situ.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a smrt $7 D003643
650    _2
$a opožděný nástup funkce štěpu $7 D051799
650    _2
$a přežívání štěpu $7 D006085
650    _2
$a ledviny $7 D007668
650    12
$a transplantace ledvin $7 D016030
650    _2
$a uchovávání orgánů $7 D009926
650    _2
$a perfuze $7 D010477
650    _2
$a prasata $7 D013552
650    _2
$a dárci tkání $7 D014019
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Třeška, Vladislav $u Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Department of Surgery, Charles University, University Hospital in Plzen, Plzen, Czech Republic; Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Transplantcentrum, Charles University, University Hospital in Plzen, Plzen, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Zeithaml, Jan $u Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Department of Surgery, Charles University, University Hospital in Plzen, Plzen, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Hes, Ondřej $u Sikl's Institute of Pathological Anatomy, University Hospital in Plzen, Plzen, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Matějka, Roman $u Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Moláček, Jiří $u Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Department of Surgery, Charles University, University Hospital in Plzen, Plzen, Czech Republic; Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Transplantcentrum, Charles University, University Hospital in Plzen, Plzen, Czech Republic. Electronic address: molacek@fnplzen.cz
773    0_
$w MED00004556 $t Transplantation proceedings $x 1873-2623 $g Roč. 53, č. 6 (2021), s. 2082-2090
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34274120 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20220113 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220127145448 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1751583 $s 1155316
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 53 $c 6 $d 2082-2090 $e 20210715 $i 1873-2623 $m Transplantation proceedings $n Transplant Proc $x MED00004556
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220113

Find record

Citation metrics

Archiving options