-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
How Much of What We Learn in Virtual Reality Transfers to Real-World Navigation
L. Hejtmanek, M. Starrett, E. Ferrer, AD. Ekstrom
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
- MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- podněty * MeSH
- učení fyziologie MeSH
- virtuální realita * MeSH
- znalosti * MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. MeSH
Past studies suggest that learning a spatial environment by navigating on a desktop computer can lead to significant acquisition of spatial knowledge, although typically less than navigating in the real world. Exactly how this might differ when learning in immersive virtual interfaces that offer a rich set of multisensory cues remains to be fully explored. In this study, participants learned a campus building environment by navigating (1) the real-world version, (2) an immersive version involving an omnidirectional treadmill and head-mounted display, or (3) a version navigated on a desktop computer with a mouse and a keyboard. Participants first navigated the building in one of the three different interfaces and, afterward, navigated the real-world building to assess information transfer. To determine how well they learned the spatial layout, we measured path length, visitation errors, and pointing errors. Both virtual conditions resulted in significant learning and transfer to the real world, suggesting their efficacy in mimicking some aspects of real-world navigation. Overall, real-world navigation outperformed both immersive and desktop navigation, effects particularly pronounced early in learning. This was also suggested in a second experiment involving transfer from the real world to immersive virtual reality (VR). Analysis of effect sizes of going from virtual conditions to the real world suggested a slight advantage for immersive VR compared to desktop in terms of transfer, although at the cost of increased likelihood of dropout. Our findings suggest that virtual navigation results in significant learning, regardless of the interface, with immersive VR providing some advantage when transferring to the real world.
3rd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Ruská 87 Prague 10 100 00 Czech Republic
Center for Neuroscience University of California Davis 1 Shields Ave Davis CA 95618 USA
Department of Psychology University of Arizona 1503 E University Blvd Tucson AZ 85719 USA
Department of Psychology University of California Davis 1 Shields Ave Davis CA 95618 USA
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22004887
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220127144846.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220113s2020 ne f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1163/22134808-20201445 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)31972540
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ne
- 100 1_
- $a Hejtmanek, Lukas $u 1Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Ruská 87, Prague 10, 100 00, Czech Republic $u 2Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, 1 Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95618, USA
- 245 10
- $a How Much of What We Learn in Virtual Reality Transfers to Real-World Navigation / $c L. Hejtmanek, M. Starrett, E. Ferrer, AD. Ekstrom
- 520 9_
- $a Past studies suggest that learning a spatial environment by navigating on a desktop computer can lead to significant acquisition of spatial knowledge, although typically less than navigating in the real world. Exactly how this might differ when learning in immersive virtual interfaces that offer a rich set of multisensory cues remains to be fully explored. In this study, participants learned a campus building environment by navigating (1) the real-world version, (2) an immersive version involving an omnidirectional treadmill and head-mounted display, or (3) a version navigated on a desktop computer with a mouse and a keyboard. Participants first navigated the building in one of the three different interfaces and, afterward, navigated the real-world building to assess information transfer. To determine how well they learned the spatial layout, we measured path length, visitation errors, and pointing errors. Both virtual conditions resulted in significant learning and transfer to the real world, suggesting their efficacy in mimicking some aspects of real-world navigation. Overall, real-world navigation outperformed both immersive and desktop navigation, effects particularly pronounced early in learning. This was also suggested in a second experiment involving transfer from the real world to immersive virtual reality (VR). Analysis of effect sizes of going from virtual conditions to the real world suggested a slight advantage for immersive VR compared to desktop in terms of transfer, although at the cost of increased likelihood of dropout. Our findings suggest that virtual navigation results in significant learning, regardless of the interface, with immersive VR providing some advantage when transferring to the real world.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 12
- $a podněty $7 D003463
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a znalosti $7 D019359
- 650 _2
- $a učení $x fyziologie $7 D007858
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 12
- $a virtuální realita $7 D000076142
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. $7 D013486
- 700 1_
- $a Starrett, Michael $u 2Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, 1 Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95618, USA $u 3Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, 1 Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95618, USA $u 4Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, 1503 E. University Blvd., Tucson, AZ 85719, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Ferrer, Emilio $u 3Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, 1 Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95618, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Ekstrom, Arne D $u 2Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, 1 Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95618, USA $u 3Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, 1 Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95618, USA $u 4Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, 1503 E. University Blvd., Tucson, AZ 85719, USA
- 773 0_
- $w MED00208710 $t Multisensory research $x 2213-4808 $g Roč. 33, č. 4-5 (2020), s. 479-503
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31972540 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220113 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220127144842 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1752180 $s 1156036
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 33 $c 4-5 $d 479-503 $e 20200317 $i 2213-4808 $m Multisensory research $n Multisens Res $x MED00208710
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20220113