-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
The use of sentinel skin islands for monitoring buried and semi-buried micro-vascular flaps. Part II: Clinical application
M. Molitor, O. Mestak, R. Pink, R. Foltan, A. Sukop, S. Lucchina
Jazyk angličtina Země Česko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, přehledy
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2001
Free Medical Journals
od 1998
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2007-06-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2001
PubMed
33821845
DOI
10.5507/bp.2021.017
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- chirurgické laloky * MeSH
- kůže MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- pooperační komplikace * MeSH
- reprodukovatelnost výsledků MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
Despite the high success rate of micro-vascular flaps, anastomosis compromise occurs in 5-10% and that can lead to flap failure. Reliable monitoring of the flap is therefore of similar importance to that of the precise surgical procedure itself. Multiple methods have been reported for monitoring of the flap vitality, the first one being direct visual monitoring. In buried flaps direct visualisation is not feasible or is unreliable. In these cases we can extend the buried flap to expose a segment of it to act as a monitoring sentinel. For the purpose of this review we used our clinical experience as a starting point, and for the extended information and expertise we conducted a search of the PubMed database. Over 40 monitoring techniques have been reported to-date. Direct visual monitoring is still generally used method with a reliability of up to 100% and an overall success rate of up to 99%. Direct visualisation remains as the simplest, cheapest and yet a very reliable method of flap monitoring. In this review we provide a description of various possible techniques for externalising part of a buried flap, define the tissues that can be used for this purpose and we summarise the procedures that should be followed to achieve the best reliability and validity of monitoring the skin island.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
Literatura
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22007865
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220330130018.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220309s2021 xr a f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.5507/bp.2021.017 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)33821845
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Molitor, Martin, $d 1966- $7 stk2008428884 $u Department of Plastic Surgery, First Faculty of Medicine Charles University and Na Bulovce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 245 14
- $a The use of sentinel skin islands for monitoring buried and semi-buried micro-vascular flaps. Part II: Clinical application / $c M. Molitor, O. Mestak, R. Pink, R. Foltan, A. Sukop, S. Lucchina
- 504 __
- $a Literatura
- 520 9_
- $a Despite the high success rate of micro-vascular flaps, anastomosis compromise occurs in 5-10% and that can lead to flap failure. Reliable monitoring of the flap is therefore of similar importance to that of the precise surgical procedure itself. Multiple methods have been reported for monitoring of the flap vitality, the first one being direct visual monitoring. In buried flaps direct visualisation is not feasible or is unreliable. In these cases we can extend the buried flap to expose a segment of it to act as a monitoring sentinel. For the purpose of this review we used our clinical experience as a starting point, and for the extended information and expertise we conducted a search of the PubMed database. Over 40 monitoring techniques have been reported to-date. Direct visual monitoring is still generally used method with a reliability of up to 100% and an overall success rate of up to 99%. Direct visualisation remains as the simplest, cheapest and yet a very reliable method of flap monitoring. In this review we provide a description of various possible techniques for externalising part of a buried flap, define the tissues that can be used for this purpose and we summarise the procedures that should be followed to achieve the best reliability and validity of monitoring the skin island.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a pooperační komplikace $7 D011183
- 650 _2
- $a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
- 650 _2
- $a kůže $7 D012867
- 650 12
- $a chirurgické laloky $7 D013524
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Měšťák, Ondřej $7 xx0175742 $u Department of Plastic Surgery, First Faculty of Medicine Charles University and Na Bulovce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Pink, Richard $7 xx0170220 $u Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Olomouc and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Foltán, René, $d 1970- $7 xx0081950 $u Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, General University Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Sukop, Andrej, $d 1968- $7 xx0098439 $u Department of Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Lucchina, Stefano $u Hand Unit, General Surgery Department, Locarno's Regional Hospital, Via Ospedale 1, 6600 Locarno, Switzerland
- 773 0_
- $w MED00012606 $t Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia $x 1213-8118 $g Roč. 165, č. 2 (2021), s. 131-138
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33821845 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b A 1502 $c 958 $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220309 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220330130014 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1775502 $s 1159058
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 165 $c 2 $d 131-138 $e 20210331 $i 1213-8118 $m Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacký, Olomouc Czech Republic $n Biomed. Pap. Fac. Med. Palacký Univ. Olomouc Czech Repub. (Print) $x MED00012606
- LZP __
- $b NLK118 $a Pubmed-20220309