Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

The diagnostic performance of whole-body MRI in the staging of lymphomas in adult patients compared to PET/CT and enhanced reference standard-systematic review and meta-analysis

L. Lambert, A. Burgetova, M. Trneny, B. Bircakova, J. Molinsky, K. Benesova, D. Zogala, P. Michalek

. 2022 ; 12 (2) : 1558-1570. [pub] -

Language English Country China

Document type Journal Article

Background: Morphology highlighted by diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) is the basis of whole-body MRI (wbMRI). The aim of this study was to analyze current knowledge on the diagnostic performance of wbMRI in the pretreatment staging of patients with lymphoma. Methods: A search for original articles reporting the diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity) of pretreatment (first staging or staging in relapsed patients after complete remission) wbMRI in nodal and extranodal involvement by extracranial lymphoma and the agreement of stage by the Cotswolds-modified Ann Arbor classification in adult patients compared to the reference standard (PET/CT or enhanced reference standard) was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov. Results: Altogether 15 studies with 519 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for nodal involvement were 0.93 (95% CI: 0.90 to 0.96) and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.98 to 1.00). For nodal staging, most studies used the size criterion of 10 mm in the short diameter (n=10) and the absence of prominent fatty hilum (n=4). Restricted diffusion on diffusion-weighted imaging as a sign of nodal involvement was either not used (n=5), used for detection (n=4), semi-quantitatively (n=4), or quantitatively (n=1). Only one study (7) relied solely on restricted diffusion as the main criterion for nodal involvement. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for extranodal involvement were 0.89 (95% CI: 0.79 to 0.98) and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.99 to 1.00). Seven studies considered diffuse splenic involvement when its long or vertical axis was greater than 13 cm regardless of the patient's physiognomy. The pooled agreement in staging (Cohen's kappa) was almost perfect (0.90, 95% CI: 0.84 to 0.95). Discussion: The sensitivity and specificity of wbMRI in the assessment of the nodal and extranodal involvement by lymphoma is high. The agreement of wbMRI with the reference standard is almost perfect.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22010106
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220425131707.0
007      
ta
008      
220420s2022 cc f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.21037/qims-21-649 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)35111648
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a cc
100    1_
$a Lambert, Lukas $u Department of Radiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
245    14
$a The diagnostic performance of whole-body MRI in the staging of lymphomas in adult patients compared to PET/CT and enhanced reference standard-systematic review and meta-analysis / $c L. Lambert, A. Burgetova, M. Trneny, B. Bircakova, J. Molinsky, K. Benesova, D. Zogala, P. Michalek
520    9_
$a Background: Morphology highlighted by diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) is the basis of whole-body MRI (wbMRI). The aim of this study was to analyze current knowledge on the diagnostic performance of wbMRI in the pretreatment staging of patients with lymphoma. Methods: A search for original articles reporting the diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity) of pretreatment (first staging or staging in relapsed patients after complete remission) wbMRI in nodal and extranodal involvement by extracranial lymphoma and the agreement of stage by the Cotswolds-modified Ann Arbor classification in adult patients compared to the reference standard (PET/CT or enhanced reference standard) was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov. Results: Altogether 15 studies with 519 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for nodal involvement were 0.93 (95% CI: 0.90 to 0.96) and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.98 to 1.00). For nodal staging, most studies used the size criterion of 10 mm in the short diameter (n=10) and the absence of prominent fatty hilum (n=4). Restricted diffusion on diffusion-weighted imaging as a sign of nodal involvement was either not used (n=5), used for detection (n=4), semi-quantitatively (n=4), or quantitatively (n=1). Only one study (7) relied solely on restricted diffusion as the main criterion for nodal involvement. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for extranodal involvement were 0.89 (95% CI: 0.79 to 0.98) and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.99 to 1.00). Seven studies considered diffuse splenic involvement when its long or vertical axis was greater than 13 cm regardless of the patient's physiognomy. The pooled agreement in staging (Cohen's kappa) was almost perfect (0.90, 95% CI: 0.84 to 0.95). Discussion: The sensitivity and specificity of wbMRI in the assessment of the nodal and extranodal involvement by lymphoma is high. The agreement of wbMRI with the reference standard is almost perfect.
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Burgetova, Andrea $u Department of Radiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Trneny, Marek $u Department of Hematology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Bircakova, Bianka $u Department of Radiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Molinsky, Jan $u Department of Hematology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Benesova, Katerina $u Department of Hematology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Zogala, David $u Institute of Nuclear Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Michalek, Pavel $u Department of Anaesthesiology, Resuscitation and Intensive Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00200676 $t Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery $x 2223-4292 $g Roč. 12, č. 2 (2022), s. 1558-1570
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35111648 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20220420 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220425131705 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ind $b bmc $g 1784487 $s 1161304
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 12 $c 2 $d 1558-1570 $e - $i 2223-4292 $m Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery $n Quant Imaging Med Surg $x MED00200676
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220420

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...