• Something wrong with this record ?

Comparison of Clinical and Reproductive Outcomes between Adenomyomectomy and Myomectomy

K. Hlinecka, M. Mara, B. Boudova, Z. Lisa, A. Richtarova, D. Kuzel

. 2022 ; 29 (3) : 392-400. [pub] 20211017

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Women with adenomyosis may show a lower pregnancy rate and a higher miscarriage rate than healthy women. There is also a general agreement that leiomyomas, either submucosal or intramural, negatively affect fertility, when compared with women without myomas. Some of these women may benefit from adenomyomectomy, however this cytoreductive procedure is considered invasive and technically challenging especially in severe diffuse cases. The study aimed to compare the clinical and reproductive outcomes of patients who underwent adenomyomectomy with those of patients who underwent intramural myomectomy. DESIGN: A retrospective study. SETTING: Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Center of Gynecological Endoscopy and Minimally Invasive surgery, First Faculty of Medicine, General University Hospital in Prague. PATIENTS: A total of 55 women who underwent surgical resection of uterine adenomyosis and 55 patients who underwent myomectomy for intramural uterine myomas were included in this study. All study participants wished to retain and possibly improve their reproductive potential. INTERVENTIONS: Between 2004 and 2019, 110 women underwent laparoscopic or open uterus-sparing surgery for clinically significant uterine adenomyosis (group A) or myomas (group B), respectively. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Two groups of women who underwent different fertility-saving procedures were compared. Although all women entering the study had declared their wish to conceive, only 28 patients in group A (group A1) and 24 women in group B (group B1) finally aimed toward pregnancy. The mean age and follow-up period was 35.0 years and 76.81 months, respectively, in group A and 34.8 years and 72.5 months, respectively, in group B. The pregnancy and delivery rates were 75.0% and 46.4%, respectively, in group A1 vs 96.0% and 70.8%, respectively, in group B1, with no significant differences between the 2 groups. The open surgical approach was significantly more frequently employed in group A (47.3% vs 16.4%; p <.01). CONCLUSION: In this study, women who underwent surgery involving the uterine muscularity, including myomectomy or adenomyomectomy, had comparable reproductive outcomes, with no significant differences.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22010881
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220506130430.0
007      
ta
008      
220425s2022 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.10.005 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)34670164
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Hlinecka, Kristyna $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Faculty Hospital, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Apolinarska, Prague, Czech Republic (all authors). Electronic address: Kristyna.Hlinecka2@vfn.cz
245    10
$a Comparison of Clinical and Reproductive Outcomes between Adenomyomectomy and Myomectomy / $c K. Hlinecka, M. Mara, B. Boudova, Z. Lisa, A. Richtarova, D. Kuzel
520    9_
$a STUDY OBJECTIVE: Women with adenomyosis may show a lower pregnancy rate and a higher miscarriage rate than healthy women. There is also a general agreement that leiomyomas, either submucosal or intramural, negatively affect fertility, when compared with women without myomas. Some of these women may benefit from adenomyomectomy, however this cytoreductive procedure is considered invasive and technically challenging especially in severe diffuse cases. The study aimed to compare the clinical and reproductive outcomes of patients who underwent adenomyomectomy with those of patients who underwent intramural myomectomy. DESIGN: A retrospective study. SETTING: Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Center of Gynecological Endoscopy and Minimally Invasive surgery, First Faculty of Medicine, General University Hospital in Prague. PATIENTS: A total of 55 women who underwent surgical resection of uterine adenomyosis and 55 patients who underwent myomectomy for intramural uterine myomas were included in this study. All study participants wished to retain and possibly improve their reproductive potential. INTERVENTIONS: Between 2004 and 2019, 110 women underwent laparoscopic or open uterus-sparing surgery for clinically significant uterine adenomyosis (group A) or myomas (group B), respectively. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Two groups of women who underwent different fertility-saving procedures were compared. Although all women entering the study had declared their wish to conceive, only 28 patients in group A (group A1) and 24 women in group B (group B1) finally aimed toward pregnancy. The mean age and follow-up period was 35.0 years and 76.81 months, respectively, in group A and 34.8 years and 72.5 months, respectively, in group B. The pregnancy and delivery rates were 75.0% and 46.4%, respectively, in group A1 vs 96.0% and 70.8%, respectively, in group B1, with no significant differences between the 2 groups. The open surgical approach was significantly more frequently employed in group A (47.3% vs 16.4%; p <.01). CONCLUSION: In this study, women who underwent surgery involving the uterine muscularity, including myomectomy or adenomyomectomy, had comparable reproductive outcomes, with no significant differences.
650    12
$a adenomyóza $x chirurgie $7 D062788
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a laparoskopie $x metody $7 D010535
650    12
$a leiomyom $x chirurgie $7 D007889
650    _2
$a těhotenství $7 D011247
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    12
$a myomektomie $x metody $7 D063186
650    12
$a nádory dělohy $x chirurgie $7 D014594
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Mara, Michal $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Faculty Hospital, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Apolinarska, Prague, Czech Republic (all authors)
700    1_
$a Boudova, Barbora $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Faculty Hospital, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Apolinarska, Prague, Czech Republic (all authors)
700    1_
$a Lisa, Zdenka $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Faculty Hospital, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Apolinarska, Prague, Czech Republic (all authors)
700    1_
$a Richtarova, Adela $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Faculty Hospital, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Apolinarska, Prague, Czech Republic (all authors)
700    1_
$a Kuzel, David $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Faculty Hospital, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Apolinarska, Prague, Czech Republic (all authors)
773    0_
$w MED00008536 $t Journal of minimally invasive gynecology $x 1553-4669 $g Roč. 29, č. 3 (2022), s. 392-400
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34670164 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20220425 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220506130422 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1788815 $s 1162079
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 29 $c 3 $d 392-400 $e 20211017 $i 1553-4669 $m Journal of minimally invasive gynecology $n J Minim Invasive Gynecol $x MED00008536
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220425

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...