-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Virtual reality intervention as a support method during wound care and rehabilitation after burns: A systematic review and meta-analysis
O. Czech, A. Wrzeciono, L. Batalík, J. Szczepańska-Gieracha, I. Malicka, S. Rutkowski
Jazyk angličtina
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, metaanalýza, přehledy, systematický přehled
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2021
ProQuest Central
od 2003-03-01 do Před 2 měsíci
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2003-03-01 do Před 2 měsíci
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2003-03-01 do Před 2 měsíci
Family Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2003-03-01 do Před 2 měsíci
Psychology Database (ProQuest)
od 2003-03-01 do Před 2 měsíci
Health Management Database (ProQuest)
od 2003-03-01 do Před 2 měsíci
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
- MeSH
- bolest MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- management bolesti metody MeSH
- popálení * terapie MeSH
- terapie pomocí virtuální reality * MeSH
- virtuální realita * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- metaanalýza MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
- systematický přehled MeSH
OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to analyze and synthesize the evidence on the effectiveness of virtual reality (VR) interventions in the prevention of pain, fear and anxiety during burn wound care procedures. METHODS: In September and October 2021, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched for relevant randomized controlled and crossover studies. Two independent authors described the following inclusion criteria for the search: patients undergoing burn wound care with applied VR treatment compared to any other or non-VR intervention. From a total of 1171 records, 25 met the inclusion criteria. After full-text screening, seven publications were excluded. The risk of bias was assessed for 18 studies by two independent authors. RevMan 5.4 was used for the statistical analysis, meta-analysis and visual presentation of the results. RESULTS: The meta-analysis showed a significant difference between VR treatment and standard care when analyzing pain outcome during wound care procedures (SMD = -0.49; 95% CI [-0.78, -0.15]; I2 = 41%) and in subgroup analysis when immersive VR was incorporated (SMD = -0.71; 95% CI [-1.07, -0.36]; I2 = 0%). No significant differences were found between VR treatment and standard care for range of motion outcome (SMD = 0.44; 95% CI [-0.23, 1.11]; I2 = 50%). CONCLUSIONS: VR seems to be an effective therapeutic support in burn wound care procedures for reducing pain. However, this systematic review and meta-analysis highlights the need for more research into the use of VR as a distraction method. Studies on larger groups using similar conditions can provide unequivocal evidence of the effectiveness of VR and enable the inclusion of such intervention in standard medical procedures.
Department of Public Health Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Department of Rehabilitation University Hospital Brno Czech Republic
Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy Opole University of Technology Opole Poland
Faculty of Physiotherapy Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences Wroclaw Poland
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22017766
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220804134403.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220720s2022 stk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.ctim.2022.102837 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)35490982
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a stk
- 100 1_
- $a Czech, Oliver $u Faculty of Physiotherapy, Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences, Wroclaw, Poland
- 245 10
- $a Virtual reality intervention as a support method during wound care and rehabilitation after burns: A systematic review and meta-analysis / $c O. Czech, A. Wrzeciono, L. Batalík, J. Szczepańska-Gieracha, I. Malicka, S. Rutkowski
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to analyze and synthesize the evidence on the effectiveness of virtual reality (VR) interventions in the prevention of pain, fear and anxiety during burn wound care procedures. METHODS: In September and October 2021, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched for relevant randomized controlled and crossover studies. Two independent authors described the following inclusion criteria for the search: patients undergoing burn wound care with applied VR treatment compared to any other or non-VR intervention. From a total of 1171 records, 25 met the inclusion criteria. After full-text screening, seven publications were excluded. The risk of bias was assessed for 18 studies by two independent authors. RevMan 5.4 was used for the statistical analysis, meta-analysis and visual presentation of the results. RESULTS: The meta-analysis showed a significant difference between VR treatment and standard care when analyzing pain outcome during wound care procedures (SMD = -0.49; 95% CI [-0.78, -0.15]; I2 = 41%) and in subgroup analysis when immersive VR was incorporated (SMD = -0.71; 95% CI [-1.07, -0.36]; I2 = 0%). No significant differences were found between VR treatment and standard care for range of motion outcome (SMD = 0.44; 95% CI [-0.23, 1.11]; I2 = 50%). CONCLUSIONS: VR seems to be an effective therapeutic support in burn wound care procedures for reducing pain. However, this systematic review and meta-analysis highlights the need for more research into the use of VR as a distraction method. Studies on larger groups using similar conditions can provide unequivocal evidence of the effectiveness of VR and enable the inclusion of such intervention in standard medical procedures.
- 650 12
- $a popálení $x terapie $7 D002056
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a bolest $7 D010146
- 650 _2
- $a management bolesti $x metody $7 D059408
- 650 12
- $a virtuální realita $7 D000076142
- 650 12
- $a terapie pomocí virtuální reality $7 D063367
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a metaanalýza $7 D017418
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 655 _2
- $a systematický přehled $7 D000078182
- 700 1_
- $a Wrzeciono, Adam $u Faculty of Physiotherapy, Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences, Wroclaw, Poland
- 700 1_
- $a Batalík, Ladislav $u Department of Rehabilitation, University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic; Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Szczepańska-Gieracha, Joanna $u Faculty of Physiotherapy, Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences, Wroclaw, Poland
- 700 1_
- $a Malicka, Iwona $u Faculty of Physiotherapy, Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences, Wroclaw, Poland
- 700 1_
- $a Rutkowski, Sebastian $u Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Opole University of Technology, Opole, Poland. Electronic address: s.rutkowski@po.opole.pl
- 773 0_
- $w MED00166678 $t Complementary therapies in medicine $x 1873-6963 $g Roč. 68, č. - (2022), s. 102837
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35490982 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220720 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220804134357 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1821736 $s 1169009
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 68 $c - $d 102837 $e 20220429 $i 1873-6963 $m Complementary therapies in medicine $n Complement. ther. clin. pract. $x MED00166678
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20220720
