• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Quality control in PET/CT and PET/MRI: Results of a survey amongst European countries

G. Reynés-Llompart, A. Zorz, R. Boellaard, J. Ptáček, L. Pike, M. Soret, S. Vandenberghe, R. Matheoud

. 2022 ; 99 (-) : 16-21. [pub] 20220520

Jazyk angličtina Země Itálie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22017921

PURPOSE: An EFOMP Working Group (WG) was created in 2020 to establish recommendations for PET/CT/MRI Quality Control (QC). The WG's intention was to create a document containing a set of measurements suitable for routine practice. In order to map the current situation in PET facilities, the WG prepared a survey addressed to European Medical Physics Experts (MPE). METHODS: The survey was conducted using an electronic questionnaire with 10 sections, for a total of 43 multiple choice or open questions. Data regarding general information, model of installed scanners, contract of maintenance and phantoms available were collected. The focal part of the questionnaire concerned the QC protocol adopted and accreditation programs. RESULTS: 123 answers from 24 countries were collected. 90.2% of the respondents are affiliated as staff MPEs; 45% have non-digital TOF PET/CT scanners with a contract of maintenance (97.6%). In 98.4% and 86.8% of responding centres a sealed source for daily QC and the NEMA Image Quality Phantom were present. 94.3% of respondents perform daily QC according to manufacturer recommendations, while NEMA Tests are not performed routinely (51.2%). 56.1% of the respondents have scanners accredited by a national or international organization. 56% of the centres perform annual CT tests, while more than 90% do not perform any MRI QCs. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the survey show that there is a lack of harmonization in the PET QC procedures across Europe. The information obtained will guide the WG in proposing a guideline containing a set of measurements suitable for the clinical routine.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22017921
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220804134449.0
007      
ta
008      
220720s2022 it f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.05.004 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)35598481
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a it
100    1_
$a Reynés-Llompart, Gabriel $u Medical Physics Department, Institut Català d'Oncologia, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain. Electronic address: greynes@iconcologia.net
245    10
$a Quality control in PET/CT and PET/MRI: Results of a survey amongst European countries / $c G. Reynés-Llompart, A. Zorz, R. Boellaard, J. Ptáček, L. Pike, M. Soret, S. Vandenberghe, R. Matheoud
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: An EFOMP Working Group (WG) was created in 2020 to establish recommendations for PET/CT/MRI Quality Control (QC). The WG's intention was to create a document containing a set of measurements suitable for routine practice. In order to map the current situation in PET facilities, the WG prepared a survey addressed to European Medical Physics Experts (MPE). METHODS: The survey was conducted using an electronic questionnaire with 10 sections, for a total of 43 multiple choice or open questions. Data regarding general information, model of installed scanners, contract of maintenance and phantoms available were collected. The focal part of the questionnaire concerned the QC protocol adopted and accreditation programs. RESULTS: 123 answers from 24 countries were collected. 90.2% of the respondents are affiliated as staff MPEs; 45% have non-digital TOF PET/CT scanners with a contract of maintenance (97.6%). In 98.4% and 86.8% of responding centres a sealed source for daily QC and the NEMA Image Quality Phantom were present. 94.3% of respondents perform daily QC according to manufacturer recommendations, while NEMA Tests are not performed routinely (51.2%). 56.1% of the respondents have scanners accredited by a national or international organization. 56% of the centres perform annual CT tests, while more than 90% do not perform any MRI QCs. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the survey show that there is a lack of harmonization in the PET QC procedures across Europe. The information obtained will guide the WG in proposing a guideline containing a set of measurements suitable for the clinical routine.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $7 D008279
650    _2
$a fantomy radiodiagnostické $7 D019047
650    12
$a PET/CT $7 D000072078
650    12
$a pozitronová emisní tomografie $x metody $7 D049268
650    _2
$a řízení kvality $7 D011786
650    _2
$a průzkumy a dotazníky $7 D011795
651    _2
$a Evropa $7 D005060
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Zorz, Alessandra $u Medical Physics Department, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy. Electronic address: alessandra.zorz@iov.veneto.it
700    1_
$a Boellaard, Ronald $u Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: r.boellaard@amsterdamumc.nl
700    1_
$a Ptáček, Jaroslav $u Department of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic. Electronic address: jaroslav.ptacek@fnol.cz
700    1_
$a Pike, Lucy $u King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, King's Health Partners, London, UK. Electronic address: lucy.1.pike@kcl.ac.uk
700    1_
$a Soret, Marine $u Sorbonne Université, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié-Salpêtrière Charles Foix, Service de Médecine Nucléaire and LIB, INSERM U1146, Paris, France. Electronic address: marine.soret@aphp.fr
700    1_
$a Vandenberghe, Stefaan $u Medical Image and Signal Processing, Ghent University, Belgium. Electronic address: stefaan.vandenberghe@ugent.be
700    1_
$a Matheoud, Roberta $u University Hospital Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy. Electronic address: roberta.matheoud@maggioreosp.novara.it
773    0_
$w MED00167391 $t Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB) $x 1724-191X $g Roč. 99, č. - (2022), s. 16-21
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35598481 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20220720 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220804134443 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1821831 $s 1169164
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 99 $c - $d 16-21 $e 20220520 $i 1724-191X $m Physica medica $n Phys Med $x MED00167391
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220720

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace