-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Prognostic Role of Residual Thrombus Burden Following Thrombectomy: Insights From the TOTAL Trial
M. Alkhalil, M. Kuzemczak, R. Zhao, C. Kavvouras, WJ. Cantor, CB. Overgaard, S. Lavi, V. Sharma, S. Chowdhary, G. Stanković, S. Kedev, I. Bernat, R. Bhindi, T. Sheth, K. Niemela, SS. Jolly, V. Džavík
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie, práce podpořená grantem
Grantová podpora
CIHR - Canada
NLK
Free Medical Journals
od 2008 do Před 1 rokem
Open Access Digital Library
od 2008-08-01
- MeSH
- infarkt myokardu * komplikace diagnostické zobrazování terapie MeSH
- kardiogenní šok etiologie terapie MeSH
- koronární angioplastika * MeSH
- koronární trombóza * diagnostické zobrazování terapie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- prognóza MeSH
- srdeční selhání * diagnostické zobrazování terapie MeSH
- trombektomie škodlivé účinky metody MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether more effective forms of thrombus removal than current aspiration catheters would lead to improved outcomes. We sought to evaluate the prognostic role of residual thrombus burden (rTB), after manual thrombectomy, in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with routine manual thrombectomy in the TOTAL trial (Thrombectomy Versus PCI Alone). METHODS: This is a single-arm analysis of patients from the TOTAL trial who underwent routine manual aspiration thrombectomy. The rTB was quantified by an angiographic core laboratory using the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction criteria and validated using existing optical coherent tomography data. Large rTB was defined as grade ≥3. The primary outcome was death from cardiovascular causes, recurrent myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, or new or worsening heart failure within 180 days. RESULTS: Of 5033 patients randomized to routine thrombectomy, 2869 patients had quantifiable rTB (1014 [35%] had large rTB). Patients with large rTB were more likely to have hypertension, previous percutaneous coronary intervention, myocardial infarction, or Killip class III on presentation but less likely to have Killip class I. The primary outcome occurred more frequently in patients with large rTB, even after adjustment for known risk predictors (8.6% versus 4.6%; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.83 [95% CI, 1.34-2.48]). These patients also had a higher risk of cardiovascular death (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.83 [95% CI, 1.13-2.95]), cardiogenic shock (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.02 [95% CI, 1.08-3.76]), and heart failure (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.74 [95% CI, 1.02-2.96]) but not myocardial infarction or stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Large rTB is a common finding in primary percutaneous coronary intervention and is associated with increased risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes, including cardiovascular death. Future technologies offering better thrombus removal than current devices may decrease or even eliminate the risk associated with rTB. This, potentially, can turn into a strategic option to be studied in clinical trials. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT01149044.
Cardiology Department Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust United Kingdom
Cardiology Department Wythenshawe Hospital Manchester United Kingdom
Cardiothoracic Centre Freeman Hospital Newcastle upon Tyne United Kingdom
Department of Cardiology University of Belgrade Serbia
Division of Cardiology University of Toronto and Southlake Regional Health Centre Canada
Division of Emergency Medicine Poznan University of Medical Sciences Poland
Heart Hospital Tampere Finland
London Health Sciences Centre Canada
Population Health Research Institute McMaster University Hamilton Canada
Royal North Shore Hospital University of Sydney Australia
Translational and Clinical Research Institute Newcastle University United Kingdom
University Clinic of Cardiology Ss Cyril and Methodius University Skopje Macedonia
University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Pilsen Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22018530
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220804134833.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220720s2022 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.121.011336 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)35580203
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Alkhalil, Mohammad $u Division of Cardiology, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Canada (M.A., M.K., C.K., V.D.) $u Cardiothoracic Centre, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom (M.A.) $u Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, United Kingdom (M.A.) $1 https://orcid.org/0000000230888878
- 245 10
- $a Prognostic Role of Residual Thrombus Burden Following Thrombectomy: Insights From the TOTAL Trial / $c M. Alkhalil, M. Kuzemczak, R. Zhao, C. Kavvouras, WJ. Cantor, CB. Overgaard, S. Lavi, V. Sharma, S. Chowdhary, G. Stanković, S. Kedev, I. Bernat, R. Bhindi, T. Sheth, K. Niemela, SS. Jolly, V. Džavík
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether more effective forms of thrombus removal than current aspiration catheters would lead to improved outcomes. We sought to evaluate the prognostic role of residual thrombus burden (rTB), after manual thrombectomy, in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with routine manual thrombectomy in the TOTAL trial (Thrombectomy Versus PCI Alone). METHODS: This is a single-arm analysis of patients from the TOTAL trial who underwent routine manual aspiration thrombectomy. The rTB was quantified by an angiographic core laboratory using the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction criteria and validated using existing optical coherent tomography data. Large rTB was defined as grade ≥3. The primary outcome was death from cardiovascular causes, recurrent myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, or new or worsening heart failure within 180 days. RESULTS: Of 5033 patients randomized to routine thrombectomy, 2869 patients had quantifiable rTB (1014 [35%] had large rTB). Patients with large rTB were more likely to have hypertension, previous percutaneous coronary intervention, myocardial infarction, or Killip class III on presentation but less likely to have Killip class I. The primary outcome occurred more frequently in patients with large rTB, even after adjustment for known risk predictors (8.6% versus 4.6%; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.83 [95% CI, 1.34-2.48]). These patients also had a higher risk of cardiovascular death (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.83 [95% CI, 1.13-2.95]), cardiogenic shock (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.02 [95% CI, 1.08-3.76]), and heart failure (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.74 [95% CI, 1.02-2.96]) but not myocardial infarction or stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Large rTB is a common finding in primary percutaneous coronary intervention and is associated with increased risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes, including cardiovascular death. Future technologies offering better thrombus removal than current devices may decrease or even eliminate the risk associated with rTB. This, potentially, can turn into a strategic option to be studied in clinical trials. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT01149044.
- 650 12
- $a koronární trombóza $x diagnostické zobrazování $x terapie $7 D003328
- 650 12
- $a srdeční selhání $x diagnostické zobrazování $x terapie $7 D006333
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a infarkt myokardu $x komplikace $x diagnostické zobrazování $x terapie $7 D009203
- 650 12
- $a koronární angioplastika $7 D062645
- 650 _2
- $a prognóza $7 D011379
- 650 _2
- $a kardiogenní šok $x etiologie $x terapie $7 D012770
- 650 _2
- $a trombektomie $x škodlivé účinky $x metody $7 D017131
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Kuzemczak, Michał $u Division of Cardiology, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Canada (M.A., M.K., C.K., V.D.) $u Division of Emergency Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poland (M.K.) $u Department of Invasive Cardiology, Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Interior and Administration, Warsaw, Poland (M.K.) $1 https://orcid.org/000000030453642X
- 700 1_
- $a Zhao, Robin $u Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada (R.Z., T.S., S.S.J.)
- 700 1_
- $a Kavvouras, Charalampos $u Division of Cardiology, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Canada (M.A., M.K., C.K., V.D.)
- 700 1_
- $a Cantor, Warren J $u Division of Cardiology, University of Toronto and Southlake Regional Health Centre, Canada (W.J.C., C.B.O.)
- 700 1_
- $a Overgaard, Christopher B $u Division of Cardiology, University of Toronto and Southlake Regional Health Centre, Canada (W.J.C., C.B.O.)
- 700 1_
- $a Lavi, Shahar $u London Health Sciences Centre, Canada (S.L.)
- 700 1_
- $a Sharma, Vinoda $u Cardiology Department, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom (V.S.)
- 700 1_
- $a Chowdhary, Saqib $u Cardiology Department, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom (S.C.)
- 700 1_
- $a Stanković, Goran $u Department of Cardiology, University of Belgrade, Serbia (G.S.) $1 https://orcid.org/0000000294140885
- 700 1_
- $a Kedev, Saško $u University Clinic of Cardiology, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, Macedonia (S.K.)
- 700 1_
- $a Bernat, Ivo $u University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Pilsen, Czech Republic (I.B.) $1 https://orcid.org/0000000331427667 $7 xx0070523
- 700 1_
- $a Bhindi, Ravinay $u Royal North Shore Hospital, University of Sydney, Australia (R.B.)
- 700 1_
- $a Sheth, Tej $u Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada (R.Z., T.S., S.S.J.)
- 700 1_
- $a Niemela, Kari $u Heart Hospital, Tampere, Finland (K.N.)
- 700 1_
- $a Jolly, Sanjit S $u Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada (R.Z., T.S., S.S.J.) $1 https://orcid.org/0000000323292504
- 700 1_
- $a Džavík, Vladimír $u Division of Cardiology, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Canada (M.A., M.K., C.K., V.D.) $1 https://orcid.org/0000000260019534
- 773 0_
- $w MED00161049 $t Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions $x 1941-7632 $g Roč. 15, č. 5 (2022), s. e011336
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35580203 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220720 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220804134827 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1822225 $s 1169773
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 15 $c 5 $d e011336 $e 20220517 $i 1941-7632 $m Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions $n Circ Cardiovasc Interv $x MED00161049
- GRA __
- $p CIHR $2 Canada
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20220720