-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Randomized trial of three IVIg doses for treating chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy
DR. Cornblath, PA. van Doorn, HP. Hartung, ISJ. Merkies, HD. Katzberg, D. Hinterberger, E. Clodi, ProCID Investigators
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, fáze III, časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, randomizované kontrolované studie, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
Free Medical Journals
od 1996 do Před 1 rokem
Open Access Digital Library
od 1996-01-01
PubMed
35038723
DOI
10.1093/brain/awab422
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- chronická zánětlivá demyelinizační polyneuropatie * farmakoterapie MeSH
- dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
- intravenózní imunoglobuliny terapeutické užití MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy usually starts with a 2.0 g/kg induction dose followed by 1.0 g/kg maintenance doses every 3 weeks. No dose-ranging studies with intravenous immunoglobulin maintenance therapy have been published. The Progress in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating polyneuropathy (ProCID) study was a prospective, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, multicentre, phase III study investigating the efficacy and safety of 10% liquid intravenous immunoglobulin (Panzyga®) in patients with active chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Patients were randomized 1:2:1 to receive the standard intravenous immunoglobulin induction dose and then either 0.5, 1.0 or 2.0 g/kg maintenance doses every 3 weeks. The primary end point was the response rate in the 1.0 g/kg group, defined as an improvement ≥1 point in adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment score at Week 6 versus baseline and maintained at Week 24. Secondary end points included dose response and safety. This trial was registered with EudraCT (Number 2015-005443-14) and clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02638207). Between August 2017 and September 2019, the study enrolled 142 patients. All 142 were included in the safety analyses. As no post-infusion data were available for three patients, 139 were included in the efficacy analyses, of whom 121 were previously on corticosteroids. The response rate was 80% (55/69 patients) [95% confidence interval (CI): 69-88%] in the 1.0 g/kg group, 65% (22/34; CI: 48-79%) in the 0.5 g/kg group, and 92% (33/36; CI: 78-97%) in the 2.0 g/kg group. While the proportion of responders was higher with higher maintenance doses, logistic regression analysis showed that the effect on response rate was driven by a significant difference between the 0.5 and 2.0 g/kg groups, whereas the response rates in the 0.5 and 2.0 g/kg groups did not differ significantly from the 1.0 g/kg group. Fifty-six per cent of all patients had an adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment score improvement 3 weeks after the induction dose alone. Treatment-related adverse events were reported in 16 (45.7%), 32 (46.4%) and 20 (52.6%) patients in the 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 g/kg dose groups, respectively. The most common adverse reaction was headache. There were no treatment-related deaths. Intravenous immunoglobulin (1.0 g/kg) was efficacious and well tolerated as maintenance treatment for patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Further studies of different maintenance doses of intravenous immunoglobulin in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy are warranted.
Brain and Mind Center University of Sydney Sydney NSW 2050 Australia
Clinical R and D Octapharma PPG Vienna 1100 Austria
Curaçao Medical Center Willemstad Curaçao
Department of Neurology Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam 3015CE The Netherlands
Department of Neurology Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf 40225 Germany
Department of Neurology Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD 21287 USA
Department of Neurology Maastricht University Medical Center Maastricht 6229 HX The Netherlands
Department of Neurology Medical University of Vienna Vienna 1090 Austria
Department of Neurology Palacky University Olomouc 771 47 Czech Republic
Department of Neurology University of Toronto Toronto M5G 2C4 Canada
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22018685
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220804134951.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220720s2022 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1093/brain/awab422 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)35038723
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Cornblath, David R $u Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
- 245 10
- $a Randomized trial of three IVIg doses for treating chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy / $c DR. Cornblath, PA. van Doorn, HP. Hartung, ISJ. Merkies, HD. Katzberg, D. Hinterberger, E. Clodi, ProCID Investigators
- 520 9_
- $a Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy usually starts with a 2.0 g/kg induction dose followed by 1.0 g/kg maintenance doses every 3 weeks. No dose-ranging studies with intravenous immunoglobulin maintenance therapy have been published. The Progress in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating polyneuropathy (ProCID) study was a prospective, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, multicentre, phase III study investigating the efficacy and safety of 10% liquid intravenous immunoglobulin (Panzyga®) in patients with active chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Patients were randomized 1:2:1 to receive the standard intravenous immunoglobulin induction dose and then either 0.5, 1.0 or 2.0 g/kg maintenance doses every 3 weeks. The primary end point was the response rate in the 1.0 g/kg group, defined as an improvement ≥1 point in adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment score at Week 6 versus baseline and maintained at Week 24. Secondary end points included dose response and safety. This trial was registered with EudraCT (Number 2015-005443-14) and clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02638207). Between August 2017 and September 2019, the study enrolled 142 patients. All 142 were included in the safety analyses. As no post-infusion data were available for three patients, 139 were included in the efficacy analyses, of whom 121 were previously on corticosteroids. The response rate was 80% (55/69 patients) [95% confidence interval (CI): 69-88%] in the 1.0 g/kg group, 65% (22/34; CI: 48-79%) in the 0.5 g/kg group, and 92% (33/36; CI: 78-97%) in the 2.0 g/kg group. While the proportion of responders was higher with higher maintenance doses, logistic regression analysis showed that the effect on response rate was driven by a significant difference between the 0.5 and 2.0 g/kg groups, whereas the response rates in the 0.5 and 2.0 g/kg groups did not differ significantly from the 1.0 g/kg group. Fifty-six per cent of all patients had an adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment score improvement 3 weeks after the induction dose alone. Treatment-related adverse events were reported in 16 (45.7%), 32 (46.4%) and 20 (52.6%) patients in the 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 g/kg dose groups, respectively. The most common adverse reaction was headache. There were no treatment-related deaths. Intravenous immunoglobulin (1.0 g/kg) was efficacious and well tolerated as maintenance treatment for patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Further studies of different maintenance doses of intravenous immunoglobulin in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy are warranted.
- 650 _2
- $a dvojitá slepá metoda $7 D004311
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a intravenózní imunoglobuliny $x terapeutické užití $7 D016756
- 650 12
- $a chronická zánětlivá demyelinizační polyneuropatie $x farmakoterapie $7 D020277
- 650 _2
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 655 _2
- $a klinické zkoušky, fáze III $7 D017428
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
- 655 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a van Doorn, Pieter A $u Department of Neurology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam 3015CE, The Netherlands
- 700 1_
- $a Hartung, Hans-Peter $u Department of Neurology, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf 40225, Germany $u Brain and Mind Center, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia $u Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna 1090, Austria $u Department of Neurology, Palacky University, Olomouc 771 47, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Merkies, Ingemar S J $u Department of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht 6229 HX, The Netherlands $u Curaçao Medical Center, Willemstad, Curaçao
- 700 1_
- $a Katzberg, Hans D $u Department of Neurology, University of Toronto, Toronto M5G 2C4, Canada
- 700 1_
- $a Hinterberger, Doris $u Clinical R&D, Octapharma PPG, Vienna 1100, Austria
- 700 1_
- $a Clodi, Elisabeth $u Clinical R&D, Octapharma PPG, Vienna 1100, Austria
- 710 2_
- $a ProCID Investigators
- 773 0_
- $w MED00009356 $t Brain : a journal of neurology $x 1460-2156 $g Roč. 145, č. 3 (2022), s. 887-896
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35038723 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220720 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220804134945 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1822349 $s 1169928
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 145 $c 3 $d 887-896 $e 20220429 $i 1460-2156 $m Brain $n Brain $x MED00009356
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20220720