-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Olaparib maintenance monotherapy in platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer patients without a germline BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation: OPINION primary analysis
A. Poveda, S. Lheureux, N. Colombo, D. Cibula, K. Lindemann, J. Weberpals, M. Bjurberg, A. Oaknin, M. Sikorska, A. González-Martín, R. Madry, MJR. Pérez, J. Ledermann, R. Davidson, C. Blakeley, J. Bennett, A. Barnicle, E. Škof
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, fáze III, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- epiteliální ovariální karcinom farmakoterapie genetika MeSH
- ftalaziny * škodlivé účinky MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- lokální recidiva nádoru * farmakoterapie genetika MeSH
- mutace MeSH
- nádory vaječníků * farmakoterapie genetika MeSH
- piperaziny * škodlivé účinky MeSH
- platina terapeutické užití MeSH
- protein BRCA1 genetika MeSH
- protein BRCA2 genetika MeSH
- udržovací chemoterapie MeSH
- zárodečné buňky MeSH
- zárodečné mutace MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
OBJECTIVE: The phase IIIb OPINION trial (NCT03402841) investigated olaparib maintenance monotherapy in patients without a deleterious or suspected deleterious germline BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation (gBRCAm) who had platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer (PSROC) and had received ≥2 previous lines of platinum-based chemotherapy. METHODS: In this single-arm, open-label, international study, patients who had responded to platinum-based chemotherapy received maintenance olaparib tablets (300 mg twice daily) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) (modified RECIST version 1.1). A key secondary endpoint was PFS by homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and somatic BRCAm (sBRCAm) status. The primary analysis of PFS was planned for 18 months after the last patient received their first dose. RESULTS: Two hundred and seventy-nine patients were enrolled and received olaparib. At data cutoff (October 2, 2020), 210 PFS events had occurred (75.3% maturity) and median PFS was 9.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.6-10.9) in the overall population. At 12 and 18 months, 38.5% and 24.3% of patients were progression-free, respectively. In the predefined biomarker subgroups, median PFS was 16.4, 11.1, 9.7, and 7.3 months in sBRCAm, HRD-positive including sBRCAm, HRD-positive excluding sBRCAm, and HRD-negative patients, respectively. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were nausea (48.4%) and fatigue/asthenia (44.1%). TEAEs led to dose interruption, dose reduction, and treatment discontinuation in 47.0%, 22.6%, and 7.5% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Maintenance olaparib demonstrated clinical benefit in patients without a gBRCAm, and across all subgroups, compared with historical placebo controls. There were no new safety signals.
General University Hospital Prague 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía Córdoba Spain
Initia Oncology Valencia Spain
Institute of Oncology Ljubljana Ljubljana Slovenia
Medical University Karol Marcinkowski Poznań Poland
Olsztyn Provincial Specialist Hospital Olsztyn Poland
Oslo University Hospital Institute of Clinical Medicine University of Oslo Oslo Norway
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Ottawa ON Canada
Princess Margaret Hospital Department of Medical Oncology Toronto ON Canada
Skåne University Hospital Lund University Lund Sweden
UCL Cancer Institute University College London and UCL Hospitals London UK
University of Milan Bicocca and European Institute of Oncology IRCCS Milan Italy
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22019284
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220804135516.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220720s2022 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.12.025 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)35063276
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Poveda, A $u Initia Oncology, Valencia, Spain. Electronic address: apoveda@initiaoncologia.com
- 245 10
- $a Olaparib maintenance monotherapy in platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer patients without a germline BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation: OPINION primary analysis / $c A. Poveda, S. Lheureux, N. Colombo, D. Cibula, K. Lindemann, J. Weberpals, M. Bjurberg, A. Oaknin, M. Sikorska, A. González-Martín, R. Madry, MJR. Pérez, J. Ledermann, R. Davidson, C. Blakeley, J. Bennett, A. Barnicle, E. Škof
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVE: The phase IIIb OPINION trial (NCT03402841) investigated olaparib maintenance monotherapy in patients without a deleterious or suspected deleterious germline BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation (gBRCAm) who had platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer (PSROC) and had received ≥2 previous lines of platinum-based chemotherapy. METHODS: In this single-arm, open-label, international study, patients who had responded to platinum-based chemotherapy received maintenance olaparib tablets (300 mg twice daily) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) (modified RECIST version 1.1). A key secondary endpoint was PFS by homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and somatic BRCAm (sBRCAm) status. The primary analysis of PFS was planned for 18 months after the last patient received their first dose. RESULTS: Two hundred and seventy-nine patients were enrolled and received olaparib. At data cutoff (October 2, 2020), 210 PFS events had occurred (75.3% maturity) and median PFS was 9.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.6-10.9) in the overall population. At 12 and 18 months, 38.5% and 24.3% of patients were progression-free, respectively. In the predefined biomarker subgroups, median PFS was 16.4, 11.1, 9.7, and 7.3 months in sBRCAm, HRD-positive including sBRCAm, HRD-positive excluding sBRCAm, and HRD-negative patients, respectively. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were nausea (48.4%) and fatigue/asthenia (44.1%). TEAEs led to dose interruption, dose reduction, and treatment discontinuation in 47.0%, 22.6%, and 7.5% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Maintenance olaparib demonstrated clinical benefit in patients without a gBRCAm, and across all subgroups, compared with historical placebo controls. There were no new safety signals.
- 650 _2
- $a protein BRCA1 $x genetika $7 D019313
- 650 _2
- $a protein BRCA2 $x genetika $7 D024682
- 650 _2
- $a epiteliální ovariální karcinom $x farmakoterapie $x genetika $7 D000077216
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a zárodečné buňky $7 D005854
- 650 _2
- $a zárodečné mutace $7 D018095
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a udržovací chemoterapie $7 D060046
- 650 _2
- $a mutace $7 D009154
- 650 12
- $a lokální recidiva nádoru $x farmakoterapie $x genetika $7 D009364
- 650 12
- $a nádory vaječníků $x farmakoterapie $x genetika $7 D010051
- 650 12
- $a ftalaziny $x škodlivé účinky $7 D010793
- 650 12
- $a piperaziny $x škodlivé účinky $7 D010879
- 650 _2
- $a platina $x terapeutické užití $7 D010984
- 655 _2
- $a klinické zkoušky, fáze III $7 D017428
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Lheureux, S $u Princess Margaret Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Toronto, ON, Canada
- 700 1_
- $a Colombo, N $u University of Milan-Bicocca and European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Cibula, D $u General University Hospital in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Lindemann, K $u Oslo University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- 700 1_
- $a Weberpals, J $u Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- 700 1_
- $a Bjurberg, M $u Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- 700 1_
- $a Oaknin, A $u Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
- 700 1_
- $a Sikorska, M $u Olsztyn Provincial Specialist Hospital, Olsztyn, Poland
- 700 1_
- $a González-Martín, A $u Program in Solid Tumors, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA) and Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
- 700 1_
- $a Madry, R $u Medical University Karol Marcinkowski, Poznań, Poland
- 700 1_
- $a Pérez, M J Rubio $u Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain
- 700 1_
- $a Ledermann, J $u UCL Cancer Institute, University College London and UCL Hospitals, London, UK
- 700 1_
- $a Davidson, R $u AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
- 700 1_
- $a Blakeley, C $u AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
- 700 1_
- $a Bennett, J $u AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
- 700 1_
- $a Barnicle, A $u AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
- 700 1_
- $a Škof, E $u Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001958 $t Gynecologic oncology $x 1095-6859 $g Roč. 164, č. 3 (2022), s. 498-504
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35063276 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220720 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220804135510 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1822752 $s 1170527
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 164 $c 3 $d 498-504 $e 20220119 $i 1095-6859 $m Gynecologic oncology $n Gynecol Oncol $x MED00001958
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20220720