-
Something wrong with this record ?
Optimal Light Source Intensity Setting in Endoscopic Ear Surgery
J. Vachutka, M. Trneckova, R. Salzman, H. Kolarova, P. Belakova
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- MeSH
- Endoscopy MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Otologic Surgical Procedures * MeSH
- Temporal Bone MeSH
- Ear, Middle surgery MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
HYPOTHESIS: Higher light intensity settings do not yield improved image quality in endoscopic ear surgery. BACKGROUND: Light intensity is a parameter with major impact on the quality of digital images. For ear surgery, light produces heat associated with a thermal risk to ear structures and the light source setting should be accordingly optimized. METHODS: Several series of still images were acquired during live middle ear surgery, using cadaveric and plastic temporal bone models and with three-dimensional printed models. Images obtained under varying light intensities were compared with the image acquired at maximum intensity of a light emitting diode light source. We analyzed digital image brightness and noise using quantitative methods. RESULTS: Our measurements revealed significantly decreased image brightness with light intensities set below 20% with an increase in noise at light intensities lower than 30%. CONCLUSION: The optimal light source setting corresponded to 30% intensity in our experimental set-up. Special attention should be given to those cases where faster image quality degradation is expected (dark or bloody scenes or larger cavities). The results were strongly dependent on the equipment used. The methods described in this study can serve as a general guide for determining the optimal light source setting in any specific set-up.
Palacky University Olomouc Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry Department of Medical Biophysics
Palacky University Olomouc Faculty of Science Department of Computer Science
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22019447
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220804135652.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220720s2022 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003410 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)34855680
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Vachutka, Jaromir $u Palacky University Olomouc, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Medical Biophysics
- 245 10
- $a Optimal Light Source Intensity Setting in Endoscopic Ear Surgery / $c J. Vachutka, M. Trneckova, R. Salzman, H. Kolarova, P. Belakova
- 520 9_
- $a HYPOTHESIS: Higher light intensity settings do not yield improved image quality in endoscopic ear surgery. BACKGROUND: Light intensity is a parameter with major impact on the quality of digital images. For ear surgery, light produces heat associated with a thermal risk to ear structures and the light source setting should be accordingly optimized. METHODS: Several series of still images were acquired during live middle ear surgery, using cadaveric and plastic temporal bone models and with three-dimensional printed models. Images obtained under varying light intensities were compared with the image acquired at maximum intensity of a light emitting diode light source. We analyzed digital image brightness and noise using quantitative methods. RESULTS: Our measurements revealed significantly decreased image brightness with light intensities set below 20% with an increase in noise at light intensities lower than 30%. CONCLUSION: The optimal light source setting corresponded to 30% intensity in our experimental set-up. Special attention should be given to those cases where faster image quality degradation is expected (dark or bloody scenes or larger cavities). The results were strongly dependent on the equipment used. The methods described in this study can serve as a general guide for determining the optimal light source setting in any specific set-up.
- 650 _2
- $a střední ucho $x chirurgie $7 D004432
- 650 _2
- $a endoskopie $7 D004724
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a otologické chirurgické výkony $7 D013506
- 650 _2
- $a spánková kost $7 D013701
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Trneckova, Marketa $u Palacky University Olomouc, Faculty of Science, Department of Computer Science
- 700 1_
- $a Salzman, Richard $u University Hospital Olomouc and Palacky University Olomouc, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery
- 700 1_
- $a Kolarova, Hana $u Palacky University Olomouc, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Medical Biophysics $u Palacky University Olomouc, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Belakova, Petra $u University Hospital Olomouc and Palacky University Olomouc, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery
- 773 0_
- $w MED00006516 $t Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology $x 1537-4505 $g Roč. 43, č. 2 (2022), s. e205-e211
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34855680 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220720 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220804135646 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1822870 $s 1170690
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 43 $c 2 $d e205-e211 $e 20220201 $i 1537-4505 $m Otology & neurotology $n Otol Neurotol $x MED00006516
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20220720