• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Defining Speech Subtypes in De Novo Parkinson Disease: Response to Long-term Levodopa Therapy

J. Rusz, T. Tykalova, M. Novotny, D. Zogala, K. Sonka, E. Ruzicka, P. Dusek

. 2021 ; 97 (21) : e2124-e2135. [pub] 20211004

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22019632

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Patterns of speech disorder in Parkinson disease (PD), which are highly variable across individual patients, have not been systematically studied. Our aim was to identify speech subtypes in treatment-naive patients with PD and to examine their response to long-term dopaminergic therapy. METHODS: We recorded speech data from a total of 111 participants with de novo PD; 83 of the participants completed the 12-month follow-up (69 patients with PD on stable dopaminergic medication and 14 untreated controls with PD). Unsupervised k-means cluster analysis was performed on 8 distinctive parameters of hypokinetic dysarthria examined with quantitative acoustic analysis. RESULTS: Three distinct speech subtypes with similar prevalence, symptom duration, and motor severity were detected: prosodic, phonatory-prosodic, and articulatory-prosodic. Besides monopitch and monoloudness, which were common in each subtype, speech impairment was more severe in the phonatory-prosodic subtype with predominant dysphonia and the articulatory-prosodic subtype with predominant imprecise consonant articulation than in the prosodic subtype. Clinically, the prosodic subtype was characterized by a prevalence of women and younger age, while articulatory-prosodic subtype was characterized by the prevalence of men, older age, greater severity of axial gait symptoms, and poorer cognitive performance. The phonatory-prosodic subtype clinically represented intermediate status in age with mostly men and preserved cognitive performance. While speech of untreated controls with PD deteriorated over 1 year (p = 0.02), long-term dopaminergic medication maintained stable speech impairment severity in the prosodic and articulatory-prosodic subtypes and improved speech performance in patients with the phonatory-prosodic subtype (p = 0.002). DISCUSSION: Distinct speech phenotypes in de novo PD reflect divergent underlying mechanisms and allow prediction of response of speech impairment to levodopa therapy. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that, in patients with newly diagnosed PD with speech impairment, speech phenotype is associated with levodopa responsiveness.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22019632
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220804135837.0
007      
ta
008      
220720s2021 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012878 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)34607922
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Rusz, Jan $u From the Department of Circuit Theory (J.R., T.T., M.N.), Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague; Department of Neurology and Centre of Clinical Neuroscience (J.R., K.S., E.R., P.D.), First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University; and Institute of Nuclear Medicine (D.Z.), First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic. rusz.mz@gmail.com $1 https://orcid.org/0000000210363054 $7 xx0093732
245    10
$a Defining Speech Subtypes in De Novo Parkinson Disease: Response to Long-term Levodopa Therapy / $c J. Rusz, T. Tykalova, M. Novotny, D. Zogala, K. Sonka, E. Ruzicka, P. Dusek
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Patterns of speech disorder in Parkinson disease (PD), which are highly variable across individual patients, have not been systematically studied. Our aim was to identify speech subtypes in treatment-naive patients with PD and to examine their response to long-term dopaminergic therapy. METHODS: We recorded speech data from a total of 111 participants with de novo PD; 83 of the participants completed the 12-month follow-up (69 patients with PD on stable dopaminergic medication and 14 untreated controls with PD). Unsupervised k-means cluster analysis was performed on 8 distinctive parameters of hypokinetic dysarthria examined with quantitative acoustic analysis. RESULTS: Three distinct speech subtypes with similar prevalence, symptom duration, and motor severity were detected: prosodic, phonatory-prosodic, and articulatory-prosodic. Besides monopitch and monoloudness, which were common in each subtype, speech impairment was more severe in the phonatory-prosodic subtype with predominant dysphonia and the articulatory-prosodic subtype with predominant imprecise consonant articulation than in the prosodic subtype. Clinically, the prosodic subtype was characterized by a prevalence of women and younger age, while articulatory-prosodic subtype was characterized by the prevalence of men, older age, greater severity of axial gait symptoms, and poorer cognitive performance. The phonatory-prosodic subtype clinically represented intermediate status in age with mostly men and preserved cognitive performance. While speech of untreated controls with PD deteriorated over 1 year (p = 0.02), long-term dopaminergic medication maintained stable speech impairment severity in the prosodic and articulatory-prosodic subtypes and improved speech performance in patients with the phonatory-prosodic subtype (p = 0.002). DISCUSSION: Distinct speech phenotypes in de novo PD reflect divergent underlying mechanisms and allow prediction of response of speech impairment to levodopa therapy. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that, in patients with newly diagnosed PD with speech impairment, speech phenotype is associated with levodopa responsiveness.
650    _2
$a dysartrie $x komplikace $7 D004401
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a levodopa $x terapeutické užití $7 D007980
650    12
$a Parkinsonova nemoc $x komplikace $x diagnóza $x farmakoterapie $7 D010300
650    _2
$a řeč $x fyziologie $7 D013060
650    _2
$a poruchy řeči $x etiologie $7 D013064
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Tykalova, Tereza $u From the Department of Circuit Theory (J.R., T.T., M.N.), Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague; Department of Neurology and Centre of Clinical Neuroscience (J.R., K.S., E.R., P.D.), First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University; and Institute of Nuclear Medicine (D.Z.), First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Novotny, Michal $u From the Department of Circuit Theory (J.R., T.T., M.N.), Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague; Department of Neurology and Centre of Clinical Neuroscience (J.R., K.S., E.R., P.D.), First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University; and Institute of Nuclear Medicine (D.Z.), First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000156084029 $7 ctu2018985794
700    1_
$a Zogala, David $u From the Department of Circuit Theory (J.R., T.T., M.N.), Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague; Department of Neurology and Centre of Clinical Neuroscience (J.R., K.S., E.R., P.D.), First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University; and Institute of Nuclear Medicine (D.Z.), First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Sonka, Karel $u From the Department of Circuit Theory (J.R., T.T., M.N.), Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague; Department of Neurology and Centre of Clinical Neuroscience (J.R., K.S., E.R., P.D.), First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University; and Institute of Nuclear Medicine (D.Z.), First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Ruzicka, Evzen $u From the Department of Circuit Theory (J.R., T.T., M.N.), Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague; Department of Neurology and Centre of Clinical Neuroscience (J.R., K.S., E.R., P.D.), First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University; and Institute of Nuclear Medicine (D.Z.), First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Dusek, Petr $u From the Department of Circuit Theory (J.R., T.T., M.N.), Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague; Department of Neurology and Centre of Clinical Neuroscience (J.R., K.S., E.R., P.D.), First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University; and Institute of Nuclear Medicine (D.Z.), First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00003491 $t Neurology $x 1526-632X $g Roč. 97, č. 21 (2021), s. e2124-e2135
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34607922 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20220720 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220804135831 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1823012 $s 1170875
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 97 $c 21 $d e2124-e2135 $e 20211004 $i 1526-632X $m Neurology $n Neurology $x MED00003491
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220720

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...