• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

How does the level of pulmonary venous isolation compare between pulsed field ablation and thermal energy ablation (radiofrequency, cryo, or laser)

I. Kawamura, P. Neuzil, P. Shivamurthy, K. Kuroki, J. Lam, D. Musikantow, E. Chu, MK. Turagam, K. Minami, M. Funasako, J. Petru, S. Choudry, MA. Miller, MN. Langan, W. Whang, SR. Dukkipati, JS. Koruth, VY. Reddy

. 2021 ; 23 (11) : 1757-1766. [pub] 20211108

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22019636

AIMS: We studied the extent/area of electrical pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) after either pulsed field ablation (PFA) using a pentaspline catheter or thermal ablation technologies. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a clinical trial (NCT03714178), paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) patients underwent PVI with a multi-electrode pentaspline PFA catheter using a biphasic waveform, and after 75 days, detailed voltage maps were created during protocol-specified remapping studies. Comparative voltage mapping data were retrospectively collected from consecutive PAF patients who (i) underwent PVI using thermal energy, (ii) underwent reablation for recurrence, and (iii) had durably isolated PVs. The left and right PV antral isolation areas and non-ablated posterior wall were quantified. There were 20 patients with durable PVI in the PFA cohort, and 39 in the thermal ablation cohort [29 radiofrequency ablation (RFA), 6 cryoballoon, and 4 visually guided laser balloon]. Pulsed field ablation patients were younger with shorter follow-up. Left atrial diameter and ventricular systolic function were preserved in both cohorts. There was no significant difference between the PFA and thermal ablation cohorts in either the left- and right-sided PV isolation areas, or the non-ablated posterior wall area. The right superior PV isolation area was smaller with PFA than RFA, but this disappeared after propensity score matching. Notch-like normal voltage areas were seen at the posterior aspect of the carina in the balloon sub-cohort, but not the PFA or RFA cohorts. CONCLUSION: Catheter-based PVI with the pentaspline PFA catheter creates chronic PV antral isolation areas as encompassing as thermal energy ablation.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22019636
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220804135840.0
007      
ta
008      
220720s2021 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1093/europace/euab150 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)34151947
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Kawamura, Iwanari $u Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Department of Cardiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1030, New York, NY, 10029, USA $1 https://orcid.org/0000000264319278
245    10
$a How does the level of pulmonary venous isolation compare between pulsed field ablation and thermal energy ablation (radiofrequency, cryo, or laser) / $c I. Kawamura, P. Neuzil, P. Shivamurthy, K. Kuroki, J. Lam, D. Musikantow, E. Chu, MK. Turagam, K. Minami, M. Funasako, J. Petru, S. Choudry, MA. Miller, MN. Langan, W. Whang, SR. Dukkipati, JS. Koruth, VY. Reddy
520    9_
$a AIMS: We studied the extent/area of electrical pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) after either pulsed field ablation (PFA) using a pentaspline catheter or thermal ablation technologies. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a clinical trial (NCT03714178), paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) patients underwent PVI with a multi-electrode pentaspline PFA catheter using a biphasic waveform, and after 75 days, detailed voltage maps were created during protocol-specified remapping studies. Comparative voltage mapping data were retrospectively collected from consecutive PAF patients who (i) underwent PVI using thermal energy, (ii) underwent reablation for recurrence, and (iii) had durably isolated PVs. The left and right PV antral isolation areas and non-ablated posterior wall were quantified. There were 20 patients with durable PVI in the PFA cohort, and 39 in the thermal ablation cohort [29 radiofrequency ablation (RFA), 6 cryoballoon, and 4 visually guided laser balloon]. Pulsed field ablation patients were younger with shorter follow-up. Left atrial diameter and ventricular systolic function were preserved in both cohorts. There was no significant difference between the PFA and thermal ablation cohorts in either the left- and right-sided PV isolation areas, or the non-ablated posterior wall area. The right superior PV isolation area was smaller with PFA than RFA, but this disappeared after propensity score matching. Notch-like normal voltage areas were seen at the posterior aspect of the carina in the balloon sub-cohort, but not the PFA or RFA cohorts. CONCLUSION: Catheter-based PVI with the pentaspline PFA catheter creates chronic PV antral isolation areas as encompassing as thermal energy ablation.
650    12
$a fibrilace síní $x diagnóza $x chirurgie $7 D001281
650    12
$a katetrizační ablace $x metody $7 D017115
650    _2
$a kryochirurgie $7 D003452
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a laserová terapie $7 D053685
650    12
$a venae pulmonales $x chirurgie $7 D011667
650    _2
$a radiofrekvenční ablace $7 D000078703
650    _2
$a recidiva $7 D012008
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
655    _2
$a klinické zkoušky $7 D016430
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Neuzil, Petr $u Department of Cardiology, Na Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Shivamurthy, Poojita $u Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Department of Cardiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1030, New York, NY, 10029, USA
700    1_
$a Kuroki, Kenji $u Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Department of Cardiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1030, New York, NY, 10029, USA $1 https://orcid.org/0000000232578216
700    1_
$a Lam, Jeff $u Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Department of Cardiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1030, New York, NY, 10029, USA
700    1_
$a Musikantow, Daniel $u Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Department of Cardiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1030, New York, NY, 10029, USA
700    1_
$a Chu, Edward $u Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Department of Cardiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1030, New York, NY, 10029, USA
700    1_
$a Turagam, Mohit K $u Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Department of Cardiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1030, New York, NY, 10029, USA
700    1_
$a Minami, Kentro $u Department of Cardiology, Na Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Funasako, Moritoshi $u Department of Cardiology, Na Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Petru, Jan $u Department of Cardiology, Na Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Choudry, Subbarao $u Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Department of Cardiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1030, New York, NY, 10029, USA
700    1_
$a Miller, Marc A $u Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Department of Cardiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1030, New York, NY, 10029, USA
700    1_
$a Langan, Marie-Noelle $u Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Department of Cardiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1030, New York, NY, 10029, USA
700    1_
$a Whang, William $u Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Department of Cardiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1030, New York, NY, 10029, USA
700    1_
$a Dukkipati, Srinivas R $u Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Department of Cardiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1030, New York, NY, 10029, USA
700    1_
$a Koruth, Jacob S $u Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Department of Cardiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1030, New York, NY, 10029, USA
700    1_
$a Reddy, Vivek Y $u Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Department of Cardiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1030, New York, NY, 10029, USA $u Department of Cardiology, Na Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00149837 $t Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology $x 1532-2092 $g Roč. 23, č. 11 (2021), s. 1757-1766
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34151947 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20220720 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220804135833 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1823015 $s 1170879
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 23 $c 11 $d 1757-1766 $e 20211108 $i 1532-2092 $m Europace $n Europace $x MED00149837
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220720

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

    Možnosti archivace