-
Something wrong with this record ?
Pain perception following computer-controlled versus conventional dental anesthesia: randomized controlled trial
S. Attia, T. Austermann, A. May, M. Mekhemar, J. Conrad, M. Knitschke, S. Böttger, HP. Howaldt, A. Riad
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
BioMedCentral
from 2001-12-01
BioMedCentral Open Access
from 2001
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2001
Free Medical Journals
from 2001
PubMed Central
from 2001
ProQuest Central
from 2009-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2001-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2001-12-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2001-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2009-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2001
Springer Nature OA/Free Journals
from 2001-12-01
- MeSH
- Anesthetics, Local * MeSH
- Pain MeSH
- Single-Blind Method MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Anesthesia, Local MeSH
- Pain Perception MeSH
- Computers MeSH
- Anesthesia, Dental * adverse effects MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
BACKGROUND: The administration of local anesthesia (LA) in dental practice requires an injection which is the leading cause of patients' fear and anxiety. Computer-controlled local anesthetic injector, designed to reduce the pain of performing local anesthesia by controlling the speed of injection. This single-blind randomised control trial aimed to compare the pain perception after computer-controlled local anesthesia (CCLA) and conventional LA. METHODS: Dental students were both test and operator group versus an experienced dentist as additional operator of the LA. Data were collected regarding gender, age, medical condition, smoking habits. Additionally, operator feedback about the handling, pain at insertion and during infiltration, excitement (Dental Anxiety Scale), and complications were assessed. RESULTS: Out of the 60 included participants, the majority were females (n = 41; 68.3%), medically healthy (n = 54; 90%), and did not receive medications (n = 54; 90%). While the participating students administered 62 (51.7%) injections, the experienced dentist administered 58 (48.3%) injections. The difference in pain perception on puncture between CCLA and conventional injections was not statistically significant (Sig. = 0.285); however, pain perception during injection was significantly different (Sig. = 0.029) between CCLA (1.65 ± 1.93) and conventional injections (2.49 ± 2.31). CONCLUSION: The professional experience influenced the pain perception while applying the LA. CCLA did not reduce pain on puncture significantly; however, pain perception during the injection was significantly reduced in the case of using CCLA devices compared to the conventional syringe.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22024361
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20221031100315.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 221017s2022 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1186/s12903-022-02454-1 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)36138388
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Attia, Sameh $u Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Justus-Liebig-University, Klinikstrasse 33, 35392, Giessen, Germany. sameh.attia@dentist.med.uni-giessen.de
- 245 10
- $a Pain perception following computer-controlled versus conventional dental anesthesia: randomized controlled trial / $c S. Attia, T. Austermann, A. May, M. Mekhemar, J. Conrad, M. Knitschke, S. Böttger, HP. Howaldt, A. Riad
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: The administration of local anesthesia (LA) in dental practice requires an injection which is the leading cause of patients' fear and anxiety. Computer-controlled local anesthetic injector, designed to reduce the pain of performing local anesthesia by controlling the speed of injection. This single-blind randomised control trial aimed to compare the pain perception after computer-controlled local anesthesia (CCLA) and conventional LA. METHODS: Dental students were both test and operator group versus an experienced dentist as additional operator of the LA. Data were collected regarding gender, age, medical condition, smoking habits. Additionally, operator feedback about the handling, pain at insertion and during infiltration, excitement (Dental Anxiety Scale), and complications were assessed. RESULTS: Out of the 60 included participants, the majority were females (n = 41; 68.3%), medically healthy (n = 54; 90%), and did not receive medications (n = 54; 90%). While the participating students administered 62 (51.7%) injections, the experienced dentist administered 58 (48.3%) injections. The difference in pain perception on puncture between CCLA and conventional injections was not statistically significant (Sig. = 0.285); however, pain perception during injection was significantly different (Sig. = 0.029) between CCLA (1.65 ± 1.93) and conventional injections (2.49 ± 2.31). CONCLUSION: The professional experience influenced the pain perception while applying the LA. CCLA did not reduce pain on puncture significantly; however, pain perception during the injection was significantly reduced in the case of using CCLA devices compared to the conventional syringe.
- 650 12
- $a zubní anestezie $x škodlivé účinky $7 D000766
- 650 _2
- $a lokální anestezie $7 D000772
- 650 12
- $a anestetika lokální $7 D000779
- 650 _2
- $a počítače $7 D003201
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a bolest $7 D010146
- 650 _2
- $a percepce bolesti $7 D058748
- 650 _2
- $a jednoduchá slepá metoda $7 D016037
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Austermann, Thomas $u Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Justus-Liebig-University, Klinikstrasse 33, 35392, Giessen, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a May, Andreas $u Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Justus-Liebig-University, Klinikstrasse 33, 35392, Giessen, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Mekhemar, Mohamed $u Clinic for Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, School of Dental Medicine, Kiel University, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, Haus B, 24105, Kiel, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Conrad, Jonas $u Clinic for Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, School of Dental Medicine, Kiel University, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, Haus B, 24105, Kiel, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Knitschke, Michael $u Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Justus-Liebig-University, Klinikstrasse 33, 35392, Giessen, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Böttger, Sebastian $u Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Justus-Liebig-University, Klinikstrasse 33, 35392, Giessen, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Howaldt, Hans-Peter $u Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Justus-Liebig-University, Klinikstrasse 33, 35392, Giessen, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Riad, Abanoub $u Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 625 00, Brno, Czech Republic $u Czech EBHC: JBI Centre of Excellence, Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Czech National Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare and Knowledge Translation (Cochrane Czech Republic, Masaryk University GRADE Centre), Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 625 00, Brno, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00006812 $t BMC oral health $x 1472-6831 $g Roč. 22, č. 1 (2022), s. 425
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36138388 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20221017 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20221031100313 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1854211 $s 1175651
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 22 $c 1 $d 425 $e 20220922 $i 1472-6831 $m BMC oral health $n BMC Oral Health $x MED00006812
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20221017
