-
Something wrong with this record ?
Molecular biomarkers to help select neoadjuvant systemic therapy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder
E. Laukhtina, B. Pradere, U. Lemberger, PI. Karakiewicz, H. Fajkovic, SF. Shariat
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article, Review
- MeSH
- Circulating Tumor DNA * genetics MeSH
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell * drug therapy genetics MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Urinary Bladder pathology MeSH
- Biomarkers, Tumor genetics MeSH
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms * drug therapy genetics MeSH
- Neoadjuvant Therapy MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Review MeSH
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In this review, we aimed to summarize the available evidence on pretreatment molecular biomarkers that may help to predict oncologic and pathologic outcomes in patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB). RECENT FINDINGS: Several readily available and easily measurable blood-based biomarkers (e.g., neutrophil to lymphocyte or platelet-lymphocyte ratios) seems to help improve the selection of UCB patients who are most likely to benefit from NAST. Recent evidence suggests liquid biopsy including circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to be a promising tool to guide the administration of NAST in UCB patients. Pretreatment molecular and genetic characterization of transurethral resection of the bladder tumor samples may also help understand the tumor biology as luminal and basal tumor subtypes seems to be more responsive to NAST, while claudin-low and luminal-infiltrated tumor subtypes are less. In the context of neoadjuvant immunotherapy, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) status and ctDNA remain the only biomarker with possible value as the clinical utility of tumor mutational burden remains controversial/poor. SUMMARY: Biomarker approach is a necessary step to usher the age of precision/personalized medicine for muscle-invasive UCB with the overarching good to prevent both over- and under-therapy. The present review may offer a robust framework to compare and assess current and future molecular biomarkers for the selection of NAST in muscle-invasive UCB.
Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit University of Montreal Health Centre Montreal Canada
Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Department of Urology La Croix Du Sud Hospital Quint Fonsegrives France
Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Dallas Texas USA
Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York New York USA
Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research Al Ahliyya Amman University Amman Jordan
Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology Vienna Austria
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22024541
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20221031100953.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 221017s2022 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001013 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)35849719
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Laukhtina, Ekaterina $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 245 10
- $a Molecular biomarkers to help select neoadjuvant systemic therapy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder / $c E. Laukhtina, B. Pradere, U. Lemberger, PI. Karakiewicz, H. Fajkovic, SF. Shariat
- 520 9_
- $a PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In this review, we aimed to summarize the available evidence on pretreatment molecular biomarkers that may help to predict oncologic and pathologic outcomes in patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB). RECENT FINDINGS: Several readily available and easily measurable blood-based biomarkers (e.g., neutrophil to lymphocyte or platelet-lymphocyte ratios) seems to help improve the selection of UCB patients who are most likely to benefit from NAST. Recent evidence suggests liquid biopsy including circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to be a promising tool to guide the administration of NAST in UCB patients. Pretreatment molecular and genetic characterization of transurethral resection of the bladder tumor samples may also help understand the tumor biology as luminal and basal tumor subtypes seems to be more responsive to NAST, while claudin-low and luminal-infiltrated tumor subtypes are less. In the context of neoadjuvant immunotherapy, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) status and ctDNA remain the only biomarker with possible value as the clinical utility of tumor mutational burden remains controversial/poor. SUMMARY: Biomarker approach is a necessary step to usher the age of precision/personalized medicine for muscle-invasive UCB with the overarching good to prevent both over- and under-therapy. The present review may offer a robust framework to compare and assess current and future molecular biomarkers for the selection of NAST in muscle-invasive UCB.
- 650 _2
- $a nádorové biomarkery $x genetika $7 D014408
- 650 12
- $a karcinom z přechodných buněk $x farmakoterapie $x genetika $7 D002295
- 650 12
- $a cirkulující nádorová DNA $x genetika $7 D000074141
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a neoadjuvantní terapie $7 D020360
- 650 _2
- $a močový měchýř $x patologie $7 D001743
- 650 12
- $a nádory močového měchýře $x farmakoterapie $x genetika $7 D001749
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Pradere, Benjamin $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
- 700 1_
- $a Lemberger, Ursula $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 700 1_
- $a Karakiewicz, Pierre I $u Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
- 700 1_
- $a Fajkovic, Harun $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
- 700 1_
- $a Shariat, Shahrokh F $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA $u Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA $u Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $u Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001296 $t Current opinion in urology $x 1473-6586 $g Roč. 32, č. 5 (2022), s. 561-566
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35849719 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20221017 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20221031100949 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1854328 $s 1175831
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 32 $c 5 $d 561-566 $e 20220715 $i 1473-6586 $m Current opinion in urology $n Curr Opin Urol $x MED00001296
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20221017