• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Rapid screening for neglect following stroke: A systematic search and European Academy of Neurology recommendations

M. Moore, E. Milosevich, R. Beisteiner, A. Bowen, M. Checketts, N. Demeyere, H. Fordell, O. Godefroy, J. Laczó, T. Rich, L. Williams, K. Woodward-Nutt, M. Husain

. 2022 ; 29 (9) : 2596-2606. [pub] 20220630

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, systematický přehled

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22024564

Grantová podpora
NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
Wellcome Trust - United Kingdom

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Unilateral neglect is a common cognitive disorder following stroke. Neglect has a significant impact on functional outcomes, so it is important to detect. However, there is no consensus on which are the best screening tests to administer to detect neglect in time-limited clinical environments. METHODS: Members of the European Academy of Neurology Scientific Panel on Higher Cortical Functions, neuropsychologists, occupational therapists, and researchers produced recommendations for primary and secondary tests for bedside neglect testing based on a rigorous literature review, data extraction, online consensus meeting, and subsequent iterations. RESULTS: A total of 512 articles were screened, and 42 were included. These reported data from 3367 stroke survivors assessed using 62 neglect screens. Tests were grouped into cancellation, line bisection, copying, reading/writing, and behavioral. Cancellation tasks were most frequently used (97.6% of studies), followed by bisection, copying, behavioral, and reading/writing assessments. The panel recommended a cancellation test as the primary screening test if there is time to administer only one test. One of several cancellation tests might be used, depending on availability. If time permits, one or more of line bisection, figure copying, and baking tray task were recommended as secondary tests. Finally, if a functional and ecological test is feasible, the Catherine Bergego Scale was recommended. Overall, the literature suggests that no single test on its own is sufficient to exclude a diagnosis of neglect. Therefore, the panel recommended that multiple neglect tests should be used whenever possible. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides consensus recommendations for rapid bedside detection of neglect in real-world, clinical environments.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22024564
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20221031100113.0
007      
ta
008      
221017s2022 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1111/ene.15381 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)35510782
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Moore, Margaret $u Department Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK $u Queensland Brain Institute, University of Brisbane, Brisbane, Qld, Australia $1 https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000000169145978
245    10
$a Rapid screening for neglect following stroke: A systematic search and European Academy of Neurology recommendations / $c M. Moore, E. Milosevich, R. Beisteiner, A. Bowen, M. Checketts, N. Demeyere, H. Fordell, O. Godefroy, J. Laczó, T. Rich, L. Williams, K. Woodward-Nutt, M. Husain
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Unilateral neglect is a common cognitive disorder following stroke. Neglect has a significant impact on functional outcomes, so it is important to detect. However, there is no consensus on which are the best screening tests to administer to detect neglect in time-limited clinical environments. METHODS: Members of the European Academy of Neurology Scientific Panel on Higher Cortical Functions, neuropsychologists, occupational therapists, and researchers produced recommendations for primary and secondary tests for bedside neglect testing based on a rigorous literature review, data extraction, online consensus meeting, and subsequent iterations. RESULTS: A total of 512 articles were screened, and 42 were included. These reported data from 3367 stroke survivors assessed using 62 neglect screens. Tests were grouped into cancellation, line bisection, copying, reading/writing, and behavioral. Cancellation tasks were most frequently used (97.6% of studies), followed by bisection, copying, behavioral, and reading/writing assessments. The panel recommended a cancellation test as the primary screening test if there is time to administer only one test. One of several cancellation tests might be used, depending on availability. If time permits, one or more of line bisection, figure copying, and baking tray task were recommended as secondary tests. Finally, if a functional and ecological test is feasible, the Catherine Bergego Scale was recommended. Overall, the literature suggests that no single test on its own is sufficient to exclude a diagnosis of neglect. Therefore, the panel recommended that multiple neglect tests should be used whenever possible. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides consensus recommendations for rapid bedside detection of neglect in real-world, clinical environments.
650    12
$a agnozie $7 D000377
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a neurologie $7 D009462
650    _2
$a neuropsychologické testy $7 D009483
650    12
$a percepční poruchy $x diagnóza $x etiologie $7 D010468
650    12
$a cévní mozková příhoda $x komplikace $x diagnóza $7 D020521
650    12
$a rehabilitace po cévní mozkové příhodě $7 D000071939
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a systematický přehled $7 D000078182
700    1_
$a Milosevich, Elise $u Department Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
700    1_
$a Beisteiner, Roland $u Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Bowen, Audrey $u Geoffrey Jefferson Brain Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Northern Care Alliance and University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
700    1_
$a Checketts, Matthew $u Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
700    1_
$a Demeyere, Nele $u Department Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK $1 https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000000304165147
700    1_
$a Fordell, Helena $u Neurosciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
700    1_
$a Godefroy, Olivier $u Department of Neurology and Laboratory of Functional Neurosciences and Pathologies, Amiens University Medical Center, Jules Verne University of Picardy, Amiens, France
700    1_
$a Laczó, Jan $u Memory Clinic, Department of Neurology, Second Faculty of Medicine and Motol University Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czechia $u International Clinical Research Center, St Anne's University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czechia
700    1_
$a Rich, Timothy $u Kessler Foundation, West Orange, New Jersey, USA $u Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey, USA
700    1_
$a Williams, Lindy $u Cognitive Aging and Impairment Neurosciences Lab, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
700    1_
$a Woodward-Nutt, Kate $u Research and Innovation, Northern Care Alliance National Health Service Group, Salford, UK
700    1_
$a Husain, Masud $u Department Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK $u Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
773    0_
$w MED00001629 $t European journal of neurology $x 1468-1331 $g Roč. 29, č. 9 (2022), s. 2596-2606
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35510782 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20221017 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20221031100111 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1854340 $s 1175854
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 29 $c 9 $d 2596-2606 $e 20220630 $i 1468-1331 $m European journal of neurology $n Eur J Neurol $x MED00001629
GRA    __
$p NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
GRA    __
$p Wellcome Trust $2 United Kingdom
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20221017

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace