-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Strengthening global midwifery education to improve quality maternity care: Co-designing the World Health Organization Midwifery Assessment Tool for Education (MATE)
B. Hunter, G. Thomas, R. Wilhelmová, P. Trendafilova, A. Blaževičienė, L. Lynch, M. Jokinen
Jazyk angličtina
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
ProQuest Central
od 2003-03-01 do Před 2 měsíci
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2003-03-01 do Před 2 měsíci
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2003-03-01 do Před 2 měsíci
- MeSH
- babictví * výchova MeSH
- kvalita zdravotní péče MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- služby zdravotní péče o matku * MeSH
- Světová zdravotnická organizace MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa MeSH
AIMS: To describe a three-phase co-designed project to develop a culturally appropriate and relevant education assessment tool, and report on pilot and field-testing phases. BACKGROUND: High-quality midwifery education is essential for high-quality maternity care (WHO 2019); however midwifery education and maternity care vary in quality throughout Europe. To support countries in strengthening their midwifery education, World Health Organization (WHO) European Region commissioned development of the Midwifery Assessment Tool for Education (MATE). The tool was developed over three years, using an iterative, collaborative process with regional experts. Published by WHO in May 2020, MATE provides focused questions and evidence-informed resources to stimulate and inform discussions within country. DESIGN: Three-phase co-design approach to develop, pilot and field-test an education assessment tool. METHODS: Phase 1: initial development of MATE with expert midwifery support; Phase 2: MATE piloting workshops in Czech Republic and Lithuania focusing on clarity, usability and relevance; Phase 3: MATE field-testing workshop in Bulgaria exploring the process of using MATE and its effectiveness for generating discussion. Purposive selection of workshop participants ensured a broad range of perspectives: clinicians, educators, students, policy makers and service users. All participants were invited to give narrative feedback during workshops and via completion of a post-workshop online survey. The XX University Research Ethics Committee advised that formal ethical review was unnecessary. RESULTS: Feedback from collaborators in all phases indicated that engaging with MATE co-design and testing was a positive experience. A 'bottoms up' approach ensured that MATE content was relevant to regional needs, culturally acceptable and appropriate. Seventy-nine individuals participated in Phases 2 and 3 and all were sent a post-workshop online survey, with 31 responses (39 %). Qualitative and quantitative data indicated that the aim of MATE was well understood, and its usability and relevance were evaluated positively. In Phase 2, improvements to wording and format were suggested. MATE was subsequently amended prior to field testing. Phase 3 feedback indicated that MATE was highly effective for generating in-country dialogue and frank discussions about the future of midwifery education and practice. CONCLUSIONS: Using a co-design approach has ensured that MATE is culturally relevant, accessible and appropriate. This initial evaluation indicates that MATE can facilitate in-country dialogue and support the strengthening of midwifery education in accordance with WHO aims. Next steps are a fully evaluated trial of MATE in a selected partner country, where we will continue to work collaboratively to optimise engagement and ensure cultural appropriateness.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22025100
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240417121634.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 221017e20220607Sco f 000 0|00 0|
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103376 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)35696821
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a Scotland
- 100 1_
- $a Hunter, Billie $u School of Healthcare Sciences, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Eastgate House, 35 - 43 Newport Road, Cardiff CF24 0AB, Wales UK. Electronic address: hunterb1@cardiff.ac.uk
- 245 10
- $a Strengthening global midwifery education to improve quality maternity care: Co-designing the World Health Organization Midwifery Assessment Tool for Education (MATE) / $c B. Hunter, G. Thomas, R. Wilhelmová, P. Trendafilova, A. Blaževičienė, L. Lynch, M. Jokinen
- 520 9_
- $a AIMS: To describe a three-phase co-designed project to develop a culturally appropriate and relevant education assessment tool, and report on pilot and field-testing phases. BACKGROUND: High-quality midwifery education is essential for high-quality maternity care (WHO 2019); however midwifery education and maternity care vary in quality throughout Europe. To support countries in strengthening their midwifery education, World Health Organization (WHO) European Region commissioned development of the Midwifery Assessment Tool for Education (MATE). The tool was developed over three years, using an iterative, collaborative process with regional experts. Published by WHO in May 2020, MATE provides focused questions and evidence-informed resources to stimulate and inform discussions within country. DESIGN: Three-phase co-design approach to develop, pilot and field-test an education assessment tool. METHODS: Phase 1: initial development of MATE with expert midwifery support; Phase 2: MATE piloting workshops in Czech Republic and Lithuania focusing on clarity, usability and relevance; Phase 3: MATE field-testing workshop in Bulgaria exploring the process of using MATE and its effectiveness for generating discussion. Purposive selection of workshop participants ensured a broad range of perspectives: clinicians, educators, students, policy makers and service users. All participants were invited to give narrative feedback during workshops and via completion of a post-workshop online survey. The XX University Research Ethics Committee advised that formal ethical review was unnecessary. RESULTS: Feedback from collaborators in all phases indicated that engaging with MATE co-design and testing was a positive experience. A 'bottoms up' approach ensured that MATE content was relevant to regional needs, culturally acceptable and appropriate. Seventy-nine individuals participated in Phases 2 and 3 and all were sent a post-workshop online survey, with 31 responses (39 %). Qualitative and quantitative data indicated that the aim of MATE was well understood, and its usability and relevance were evaluated positively. In Phase 2, improvements to wording and format were suggested. MATE was subsequently amended prior to field testing. Phase 3 feedback indicated that MATE was highly effective for generating in-country dialogue and frank discussions about the future of midwifery education and practice. CONCLUSIONS: Using a co-design approach has ensured that MATE is culturally relevant, accessible and appropriate. This initial evaluation indicates that MATE can facilitate in-country dialogue and support the strengthening of midwifery education in accordance with WHO aims. Next steps are a fully evaluated trial of MATE in a selected partner country, where we will continue to work collaboratively to optimise engagement and ensure cultural appropriateness.
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a služby zdravotní péče o matku $7 D008427
- 650 12
- $a babictví $x výchova $7 D008880
- 650 _2
- $a těhotenství $7 D011247
- 650 _2
- $a kvalita zdravotní péče $7 D011787
- 650 _2
- $a Světová zdravotnická organizace $7 D014944
- 651 _2
- $a Evropa $7 D005060
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Thomas, Grace $u School of Healthcare Sciences, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Eastgate House, 35 - 43 Newport Road, Cardiff CF24 0AB, Wales UK. Electronic address: ThomasSG4@cardiff.ac.uk
- 700 1_
- $a Wilhelmová, Radka, $u Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Komenského nám. 2, Brno 60200, Czech Republic. Electronic address: rwilhelm@med.muni.cz $d 1966- $7 mub2010608969
- 700 1_
- $a Trendafilova, Petya $u Department of Health Care, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University - Sofia, 8 Byalo more str., 4th floor, 1527 Sofia, Bulgaria. Electronic address: p.trendafilova@yahoo.com
- 700 1_
- $a Blaževičienė, Aurelija $u Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Eivenių str. 4, Kaunas, LT-44307, Lithuania. Electronic address: aurelija.blazeviciene@lsmuni.lt
- 700 1_
- $a Lynch, Lynn $u School of Healthcare Sciences, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Eastgate House, 35 - 43 Newport Road, Cardiff CF24 0AB, Wales UK. Electronic address: lynnavis@yahoo.com
- 700 1_
- $a Jokinen, Mervi $u Royal College of Midwives, 10-18 Union Street, London SE1 1SZ, UK. Electronic address: Mervi.jokinen@rcm.org.uk
- 773 0_
- $w MED00167299 $t Nurse education in practice $x 1873-5223 $g Roč. 63 (20220607), s. 103376
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35696821 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20221017 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240417121629 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1854683 $s 1176390
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 63 $c - $d 103376 $e 20220607 $i 1873-5223 $m Nurse education in practice $n Nurse Educ Pract $x MED00167299
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20221017