Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Statistical Evaluation of Correlated Measurement Data in Longitudinal Setting Based on Bilateral Corneal Cross-Linking

R. Herber, X. Graehlert, F. Raiskup, M. Veselá, LE. Pillunat, E. Spoerl

. 2022 ; 47 (7) : 995-1002. [pub] 20220330

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

PURPOSE: In ophthalmology, data from both eyes of a person are frequently included in the statistical evaluation. This violates the requirement of data independence for classical statistical tests (e.g. t-Test or analysis of variance (ANOVA)) because it is correlated data. Linear mixed models (LMM) were used as a possibility to include the data of both eyes in the statistical evaluation. METHODS: The LMM is available for a variety of statistical software such as SPSS or R. The application was applied to a retrospective longitudinal analysis of an accelerated corneal cross-linking (ACXL (9*10)) treatment in progressive keratoconus (KC) with a follow-up period of 36 months. Forty eyes of 20 patients were included, whereas sequential bilateral CXL treatment was performed within 12 months. LMM and ANOVA for repeated measurements were used for statistical evaluation of topographical and tomographical data measured by Pentacam (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany). RESULTS: Both eyes were classified into a worse and better eye concerning corneal topography. Visual acuity, keratometric values and minimal corneal thickness were statistically significant between them at baseline (p < 0.05). A significant correlation between worse and better eye was shown (p < 0.05). Therefore, analyzing the data at each follow-up visit using ANOVA partially led to an overestimation of the statistical effect that could be avoided by using LMM. After 36 months, ACXL has significantly improved BCVA and flattened the cornea. CONCLUSION: The evaluation of data of both eyes without considering their correlation using classical statistical tests leads to an overestimation of the statistical effect, which can be avoided by using the LMM.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22025302
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20221031100130.0
007      
ta
008      
221017s2022 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1080/02713683.2022.2052105 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)35354347
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Herber, Robert $u Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Germany
245    10
$a Statistical Evaluation of Correlated Measurement Data in Longitudinal Setting Based on Bilateral Corneal Cross-Linking / $c R. Herber, X. Graehlert, F. Raiskup, M. Veselá, LE. Pillunat, E. Spoerl
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: In ophthalmology, data from both eyes of a person are frequently included in the statistical evaluation. This violates the requirement of data independence for classical statistical tests (e.g. t-Test or analysis of variance (ANOVA)) because it is correlated data. Linear mixed models (LMM) were used as a possibility to include the data of both eyes in the statistical evaluation. METHODS: The LMM is available for a variety of statistical software such as SPSS or R. The application was applied to a retrospective longitudinal analysis of an accelerated corneal cross-linking (ACXL (9*10)) treatment in progressive keratoconus (KC) with a follow-up period of 36 months. Forty eyes of 20 patients were included, whereas sequential bilateral CXL treatment was performed within 12 months. LMM and ANOVA for repeated measurements were used for statistical evaluation of topographical and tomographical data measured by Pentacam (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany). RESULTS: Both eyes were classified into a worse and better eye concerning corneal topography. Visual acuity, keratometric values and minimal corneal thickness were statistically significant between them at baseline (p < 0.05). A significant correlation between worse and better eye was shown (p < 0.05). Therefore, analyzing the data at each follow-up visit using ANOVA partially led to an overestimation of the statistical effect that could be avoided by using LMM. After 36 months, ACXL has significantly improved BCVA and flattened the cornea. CONCLUSION: The evaluation of data of both eyes without considering their correlation using classical statistical tests leads to an overestimation of the statistical effect, which can be avoided by using the LMM.
650    _2
$a kolagen $x terapeutické užití $7 D003094
650    _2
$a rohovka $7 D003315
650    _2
$a rohovková topografie $7 D019781
650    _2
$a reagencia zkříženě vázaná $x terapeutické užití $7 D003432
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a keratokonus $x diagnóza $x farmakoterapie $7 D007640
650    12
$a fotochemoterapie $7 D010778
650    _2
$a fotosenzibilizující látky $x terapeutické užití $7 D017319
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a riboflavin $x terapeutické užití $7 D012256
650    _2
$a ultrafialové záření $7 D014466
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Graehlert, Xina $u Coordination Center for Clinical Studies - KKS Dresden, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Germany
700    1_
$a Raiskup, Frederik $u Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Germany
700    1_
$a Veselá, Martina $u Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine Hradec Králové, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Pillunat, Lutz E $u Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Germany
700    1_
$a Spoerl, Eberhard $u Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Germany
773    0_
$w MED00001270 $t Current eye research $x 1460-2202 $g Roč. 47, č. 7 (2022), s. 995-1002
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35354347 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20221017 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20221031100128 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1854821 $s 1176592
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 47 $c 7 $d 995-1002 $e 20220330 $i 1460-2202 $m Current eye research $n Curr Eye Res $x MED00001270
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20221017

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...