-
Something wrong with this record ?
Client-Identified Impacts of Helpful and Hindering Events in Psychotherapy: A Qualitative Meta-analysis
M. Ladmanová, T. Řiháček, L. Timulak
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- MeSH
- Emotions MeSH
- Qualitative Research MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Psychotherapy * MeSH
- Professional-Patient Relations * MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Meta-Analysis MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
OBJECTIVE: Understanding the client perspective is important for the provision of psychotherapy. The significant events paradigm, within which clients report on the most significant events of a therapy session immediately after the session, represents a useful means to explore clients' in-session experience. METHOD: The aim of this study was to investigate what types of client-identified impacts are reported in qualitative studies on helpful and hindering events in psychotherapy. Seventeen primary studies focusing on client-identified helpful and hindering events were identified through database searches and subsequent manual searches. The data were subjected to qualitative meta-analysis. RESULTS: The descriptions of event impacts were classified into 12 helpful (e.g., gaining a new perspective on the self; feeling heard, understood, and accepted; and feeling engaged in the therapeutic process) and eight hindering (e.g., lacking guidance from the therapist and feeling emotionally overwhelmed) impact meta-categories. CONCLUSION: The findings provide an update to a previous meta-analysis by identifying several new categories of helpful event impacts and by categorizing hindering event impacts.
Department of Psychology Faculty of Social Studies Masaryk University Brno Czechia
School of Psychology Trinity College Dublin University of Dublin Dublin Ireland
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22025367
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250716105246.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 221017s2022 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1080/10503307.2021.2003885 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)34806550
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Ladmanová, Michaela $u Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Studies, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia $1 https://orcid.org/0000000198096044 $7 xx0334047
- 245 10
- $a Client-Identified Impacts of Helpful and Hindering Events in Psychotherapy: A Qualitative Meta-analysis / $c M. Ladmanová, T. Řiháček, L. Timulak
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVE: Understanding the client perspective is important for the provision of psychotherapy. The significant events paradigm, within which clients report on the most significant events of a therapy session immediately after the session, represents a useful means to explore clients' in-session experience. METHOD: The aim of this study was to investigate what types of client-identified impacts are reported in qualitative studies on helpful and hindering events in psychotherapy. Seventeen primary studies focusing on client-identified helpful and hindering events were identified through database searches and subsequent manual searches. The data were subjected to qualitative meta-analysis. RESULTS: The descriptions of event impacts were classified into 12 helpful (e.g., gaining a new perspective on the self; feeling heard, understood, and accepted; and feeling engaged in the therapeutic process) and eight hindering (e.g., lacking guidance from the therapist and feeling emotionally overwhelmed) impact meta-categories. CONCLUSION: The findings provide an update to a previous meta-analysis by identifying several new categories of helpful event impacts and by categorizing hindering event impacts.
- 650 _2
- $a emoce $7 D004644
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a vztahy mezi zdravotnickým pracovníkem a pacientem $7 D011369
- 650 12
- $a psychoterapie $7 D011613
- 650 _2
- $a kvalitativní výzkum $7 D036301
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a metaanalýza $7 D017418
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Řiháček, Tomáš $u Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Studies, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia $1 https://orcid.org/0000000158939289
- 700 1_
- $a Timulak, Ladislav $u School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland $1 https://orcid.org/0000000327850753
- 773 0_
- $w MED00181662 $t Psychotherapy research $x 1468-4381 $g Roč. 32, č. 6 (2022), s. 723-735
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34806550 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20221017 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250716105229 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1854869 $s 1176657
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 32 $c 6 $d 723-735 $e 20211122 $i 1468-4381 $m Psychotherapy research $n Psychother Res $x MED00181662
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20221017