• Something wrong with this record ?

coMpliAnce with evideNce-based cliniCal guidelines in the managemenT of acute biliaRy pancreAtitis): The MANCTRA-1 international audit

M. Podda, D. Pacella, G. Pellino, F. Coccolini, A. Giordano, S. Di Saverio, F. Pata, B. Ielpo, F. Virdis, D. Damaskos, B. De Simone, F. Agresta, M. Sartelli, A. Leppaniemi, C. Riboni, V. Agnoletti, D. Mole, Y. Kluger, F. Catena, A. Pisanu,...

. 2022 ; 22 (7) : 902-916. [pub] 20220716

Language English Country Switzerland

Document type Clinical Study, Journal Article

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Reports about the implementation of recommendations from acute pancreatitis guidelines are scant. This study aimed to evaluate, on a patient-data basis, the contemporary practice patterns of management of biliary acute pancreatitis and to compare these practices with the recommendations by the most updated guidelines. METHODS: All consecutive patients admitted to any of the 150 participating general surgery (GS), hepatopancreatobiliary surgery (HPB), internal medicine (IM) and gastroenterology (GA) departments with a diagnosis of biliary acute pancreatitis between 01/01/2019 and 31/12/2020 were included in the study. Categorical data were reported as percentages representing the proportion of all study patients or different and well-defined cohorts for each variable. Continuous data were expressed as mean and standard deviation. Differences between the compliance obtained in the four different subgroups were compared using the Mann-Whitney U, Student's t, ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis tests for continuous data, and the Chi-square test or the Fisher's exact test for categorical data. RESULTS: Complete data were available for 5275 patients. The most commonly discordant gaps between daily clinical practice and recommendations included the optimal timing for the index CT scan (6.1%, χ2 6.71, P = 0.081), use of prophylactic antibiotics (44.2%, χ2 221.05, P < 0.00001), early enteral feeding (33.2%, χ2 11.51, P = 0.009), and the implementation of early cholecystectomy strategies (29%, χ2 354.64, P < 0.00001), with wide variability based on the admitting speciality. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study showed an overall poor compliance with evidence-based guidelines in the management of ABP, with wide variability based on the admitting speciality. Study protocol registered in ClinicalTrials.Gov (ID Number NCT04747990).

'Luigi Vanvitelli' University of Campania Naples Italy

Centre for Inflammation Research Clinical Surgery University of Edinburgh Edinburgh Scotland UK

Colorectal Surgery Vall d'Hebron University Hospital Barcelona Spain

Department of Abdominal Surgery Abdominal Center University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Central Hospital Helsinki Finland

Department of Emergency and Metabolic Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Poissy Saint Germain en Laye Poissy Cedex France

Department of Emergency and Trauma Surgery Bufalini Hospital Cesena Italy

Department of General Surgery Santo Stefano Hospital Prato Italy

Department of Surgery EOC Regional Hospital Lugano Switzerland

Department of Surgery Macerata Civil Hospital Macerata Italy

Department of Surgery Madonna del Soccorso Hospital San Benedetto del Tronto Italy

Department of Surgery Vittorio Veneto Civil Hospital Vittorio Veneto Italy

Department of Surgical Science Emergency Surgery Unit University of Cagliari Cagliari Italy

Department of Upper GI Surgery Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh Edinburgh Scotland UK

Division of General Surgery Rambam Health Care Campus Haifa Israel

General Emergency and Trauma Surgery Unit Pisa University Hospital Pisa Italy

General Surgery Unit Nicola Giannettasio Hospital Corigliano Rossano Italy

HPB Surgery Unit Hospital del Mar Barcelona Spain

Intensive Care Unit Bufalini Hospital Cesena Italy

Trauma and Acute Care Surgery Unit Niguarda Ca Granda Hospital Milan Italy

University of Naples Federico 2 Department of Public Health Naples Italy

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22032887
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20230131150803.0
007      
ta
008      
230120s2022 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.pan.2022.07.007 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)35963665
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Podda, Mauro $u Department of Surgical Science, Emergency Surgery Unit, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy. Electronic address: mauro.podda@unica.it
245    10
$a coMpliAnce with evideNce-based cliniCal guidelines in the managemenT of acute biliaRy pancreAtitis): The MANCTRA-1 international audit / $c M. Podda, D. Pacella, G. Pellino, F. Coccolini, A. Giordano, S. Di Saverio, F. Pata, B. Ielpo, F. Virdis, D. Damaskos, B. De Simone, F. Agresta, M. Sartelli, A. Leppaniemi, C. Riboni, V. Agnoletti, D. Mole, Y. Kluger, F. Catena, A. Pisanu, MANCTRA-1 Collaborative Group, Principal Investigator, Steering Committee, MANCTRA-1 Coordinating Group, Local Collaborators, Argentina, Australia, Bahrain, Brazil, Bulgaria, China, Colombia, Czech Republic, Egypt, France, Georgia, Greece, Guatemala, India, Italy, Jordan, Malaysia, Mexico, Nigeria, Pakistan, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovak Republic, South Africa, Spain, Sudan, Switzerland, Syria, Tunisia, Turkey, United Kingdom, Uruguay, Yemen
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Reports about the implementation of recommendations from acute pancreatitis guidelines are scant. This study aimed to evaluate, on a patient-data basis, the contemporary practice patterns of management of biliary acute pancreatitis and to compare these practices with the recommendations by the most updated guidelines. METHODS: All consecutive patients admitted to any of the 150 participating general surgery (GS), hepatopancreatobiliary surgery (HPB), internal medicine (IM) and gastroenterology (GA) departments with a diagnosis of biliary acute pancreatitis between 01/01/2019 and 31/12/2020 were included in the study. Categorical data were reported as percentages representing the proportion of all study patients or different and well-defined cohorts for each variable. Continuous data were expressed as mean and standard deviation. Differences between the compliance obtained in the four different subgroups were compared using the Mann-Whitney U, Student's t, ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis tests for continuous data, and the Chi-square test or the Fisher's exact test for categorical data. RESULTS: Complete data were available for 5275 patients. The most commonly discordant gaps between daily clinical practice and recommendations included the optimal timing for the index CT scan (6.1%, χ2 6.71, P = 0.081), use of prophylactic antibiotics (44.2%, χ2 221.05, P < 0.00001), early enteral feeding (33.2%, χ2 11.51, P = 0.009), and the implementation of early cholecystectomy strategies (29%, χ2 354.64, P < 0.00001), with wide variability based on the admitting speciality. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study showed an overall poor compliance with evidence-based guidelines in the management of ABP, with wide variability based on the admitting speciality. Study protocol registered in ClinicalTrials.Gov (ID Number NCT04747990).
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a akutní nemoc $7 D000208
650    _2
$a cholecystektomie $7 D002763
650    _2
$a enterální výživa $7 D004750
650    _2
$a hospitalizace $7 D006760
650    12
$a pankreatitida $x chirurgie $x diagnóza $7 D010195
655    _2
$a klinická studie $7 D000068397
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Pacella, Daniela $u University of Naples Federico II, Department of Public Health, Naples, Italy
700    1_
$a Pellino, Gianluca $u 'Luigi Vanvitelli' University of Campania, Naples, Italy; Colorectal Surgery, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
700    1_
$a Coccolini, Federico $u General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Unit, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
700    1_
$a Giordano, Alessio $u Department of General Surgery, Santo Stefano Hospital, Prato, Italy
700    1_
$a Di Saverio, Salomone $u Department of Surgery, Madonna del Soccorso Hospital, San Benedetto del Tronto, Italy
700    1_
$a Pata, Francesco $u General Surgery Unit, Nicola Giannettasio Hospital, Corigliano-Rossano, Italy
700    1_
$a Ielpo, Benedetto $u HPB Surgery Unit, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
700    1_
$a Virdis, Francesco $u Trauma and Acute Care Surgery Unit, Niguarda Ca Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy
700    1_
$a Damaskos, Dimitrios $u Department of Upper GI Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
700    1_
$a De Simone, Belinda $u Department of Emergency and Metabolic Minimally Invasive Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Poissy/Saint Germain en Laye, Poissy Cedex, France
700    1_
$a Agresta, Ferdinando $u Department of Surgery, Vittorio Veneto Civil Hospital, Vittorio Veneto, Italy
700    1_
$a Sartelli, Massimo $u Department of Surgery, Macerata Civil Hospital, Macerata, Italy
700    1_
$a Leppaniemi, Ari $u Department of Abdominal Surgery, Abdominal Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
700    1_
$a Riboni, Cristiana $u Department of Surgery, EOC Regional Hospital, Lugano, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Agnoletti, Vanni $u Intensive Care Unit, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
700    1_
$a Mole, Damian $u Centre for Inflammation Research, Clinical Surgery, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
700    1_
$a Kluger, Yoram $u Division of General Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
700    1_
$a Catena, Fausto $u Department of Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
700    1_
$a Pisanu, Adolfo $u Department of Surgical Science, Emergency Surgery Unit, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
710    2_
$a MANCTRA-1 Collaborative Group
710    2_
$a Principal Investigator
710    2_
$a Steering Committee
710    2_
$a MANCTRA-1 Coordinating Group
710    2_
$a Local Collaborators
710    2_
$a Argentina
710    2_
$a Australia
710    2_
$a Bahrain
710    2_
$a Brazil
710    2_
$a Bulgaria
710    2_
$a China
710    2_
$a Colombia
710    2_
$a Czech Republic
710    2_
$a Egypt
710    2_
$a France
710    2_
$a Georgia
710    2_
$a Greece
710    2_
$a Guatemala
710    2_
$a India
710    2_
$a Italy
710    2_
$a Jordan
710    2_
$a Malaysia
710    2_
$a Mexico
710    2_
$a Nigeria
710    2_
$a Pakistan
710    2_
$a Paraguay
710    2_
$a Peru
710    2_
$a Philippines
710    2_
$a Poland
710    2_
$a Portugal
710    2_
$a Qatar
710    2_
$a Romania
710    2_
$a Russia
710    2_
$a Serbia
710    2_
$a Slovak Republic
710    2_
$a South Africa
710    2_
$a Spain
710    2_
$a Sudan
710    2_
$a Switzerland
710    2_
$a Syria
710    2_
$a Tunisia
710    2_
$a Turkey
710    2_
$a United Kingdom
710    2_
$a Uruguay
710    2_
$a Yemen
773    0_
$w MED00008752 $t Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.] $x 1424-3911 $g Roč. 22, č. 7 (2022), s. 902-916
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35963665 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20230120 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20230131150759 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1891566 $s 1184222
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 22 $c 7 $d 902-916 $e 20220716 $i 1424-3911 $m Pancreatology $n Pancreatology $x MED00008752
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20230120

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...