• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Neuropsychological tests and prediction of dementia in association with the degree of carotid stenosis

O. Machaczka, D. Skoloudik, J. Janoutova, M. Roubec, E. Reiterova, M. Kovalova, A. Zatloukalova, P. Ambroz, V. Janout

. 2022 ; 20 (4) : 115-123. [pub] 20221215

Jazyk angličtina Země Česko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22034281

Grantová podpora
NU20-09-00119 Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic - Czech Republic
JG_2019_004 Palacký University Olomouc - Czech Republic

This study constitutes a cross sectional analysis of the association between cognitive impairment defined by neuropsychological tests and carotid stenosis. The main objective was to compare the results of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-Revised (ACE-R) with regard to the degree of carotid stenosis. The sample comprised 744 patients who underwent a carotid duplex ultrasound and cognitive function testing (by ACE-R and MMSE). A multivariable analysis of potential confounding factors was completed. The significance of the different number of positive (MMSE ≤ 27, ACE-R ≤ 88) and negative (MMSE ≥ 28, ACE-R ≥ 89) results of the neuropsychological tests was analysed with regard to the degree of carotid stenosis (50-99%). Neuropsychological test results were also compared between carotid stenosis of 50-69%, 70-89%, and 90-99%. For both the MMSE and ACE-R, a difference was observed between positive and negative test results when higher degrees of stenosis were present. However, for the ACE-R only, more severe stenosis (80-89%, 90-99%) was predominantly associated with positive test results (p-value < 0.017). The same dependence for ACE-R (although not statistically significant) was observed in the group of patients without an ischemic stroke (confounding factor). In the case of the MMSE and more severe stenosis, negative results predominated, regardless of the confounding factor. There were no statistically significant differences in test results between carotid stenosis of 50-69%, 70-89%, and 90-99%. The results suggest that for assessing the early risk of cognitive impairment in patients with carotid atherosclerosis, the ACE-R appears more suitable than the MMSE.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22034281
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20230210111622.0
007      
ta
008      
230207s2022 pl d f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.32725/jab.2022.018 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)36708716
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Machaczka, Ondřej $u Palacky University Olomouc, Faculty of Health Sciences, Science and Research Centre, Olomouc, Czech Republic $u Palacky University Olomouc, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Healthcare Management and Public Health, Olomouc, Czech Republic $7 xx0224260
245    10
$a Neuropsychological tests and prediction of dementia in association with the degree of carotid stenosis / $c O. Machaczka, D. Skoloudik, J. Janoutova, M. Roubec, E. Reiterova, M. Kovalova, A. Zatloukalova, P. Ambroz, V. Janout
520    9_
$a This study constitutes a cross sectional analysis of the association between cognitive impairment defined by neuropsychological tests and carotid stenosis. The main objective was to compare the results of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-Revised (ACE-R) with regard to the degree of carotid stenosis. The sample comprised 744 patients who underwent a carotid duplex ultrasound and cognitive function testing (by ACE-R and MMSE). A multivariable analysis of potential confounding factors was completed. The significance of the different number of positive (MMSE ≤ 27, ACE-R ≤ 88) and negative (MMSE ≥ 28, ACE-R ≥ 89) results of the neuropsychological tests was analysed with regard to the degree of carotid stenosis (50-99%). Neuropsychological test results were also compared between carotid stenosis of 50-69%, 70-89%, and 90-99%. For both the MMSE and ACE-R, a difference was observed between positive and negative test results when higher degrees of stenosis were present. However, for the ACE-R only, more severe stenosis (80-89%, 90-99%) was predominantly associated with positive test results (p-value < 0.017). The same dependence for ACE-R (although not statistically significant) was observed in the group of patients without an ischemic stroke (confounding factor). In the case of the MMSE and more severe stenosis, negative results predominated, regardless of the confounding factor. There were no statistically significant differences in test results between carotid stenosis of 50-69%, 70-89%, and 90-99%. The results suggest that for assessing the early risk of cognitive impairment in patients with carotid atherosclerosis, the ACE-R appears more suitable than the MMSE.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a stenóza arteria carotis $x diagnóza $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D016893
650    _2
$a stenóza $7 D003251
650    _2
$a průřezové studie $7 D003430
650    _2
$a neuropsychologické testy $7 D009483
650    12
$a demence $x diagnóza $x etiologie $x psychologie $7 D003704
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Školoudík, David, $u Palacky University Olomouc, Faculty of Health Sciences, Science and Research Centre, Olomouc, Czech Republic $u University of Ostrava, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Research Center, Ostrava, Czech Republic $d 1972- $7 xx0020614
700    1_
$a Janoutová, Jana $u Palacky University Olomouc, Faculty of Health Sciences, Science and Research Centre, Olomouc, Czech Republic $u Palacky University Olomouc, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Public Health, Olomouc, Czech Republic $7 xx0224262
700    1_
$a Roubec, Martin $u Palacky University Olomouc, Faculty of Health Sciences, Science and Research Centre, Olomouc, Czech Republic $u University of Ostrava, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Research Center, Ostrava, Czech Republic $u University Hospital Ostrava, Department of Neurology, Ostrava, Czech Republic $7 xx0231427
700    1_
$a Reiterová, Eva, $u Palacky University Olomouc, Faculty of Health Sciences, Science and Research Centre, Olomouc, Czech Republic $d 1964- $7 jn20001103682
700    1_
$a Kovalová, Martina $u Palacky University Olomouc, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Healthcare Management and Public Health, Olomouc, Czech Republic $7 xx0236136
700    1_
$a Zatloukalová, Anna $u Palacky University Olomouc, Faculty of Health Sciences, Science and Research Centre, Olomouc, Czech Republic $u Palacky University Olomouc, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Healthcare Management and Public Health, Olomouc, Czech Republic $7 xx0224265
700    1_
$a Ambroz, Petr $u Palacky University Olomouc, Faculty of Health Sciences, Science and Research Centre, Olomouc, Czech Republic $u Palacky University Olomouc, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Healthcare Management and Public Health, Olomouc, Czech Republic $7 xx0172939
700    1_
$a Janout, Vladimír, $u Palacky University Olomouc, Faculty of Health Sciences, Science and Research Centre, Olomouc, Czech Republic $d 1939- $7 jn20010524003
773    0_
$w MED00012667 $t Journal of applied biomedicine $x 1214-0287 $g Roč. 20, č. 4 (2022), s. 115-123
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36708716 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b B 2301 $c 1249 $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20230207 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20230210111613 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1896180 $s 1185671
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 20 $c 4 $d 115-123 $e 20221215 $i 1214-0287 $m Journal of Applied Biomedicine $n J. Appl. Biomed. (Čes. Budějovice Print) $x MED00012667
GRA    __
$a NU20-09-00119 $p Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic $2 Czech Republic
GRA    __
$a JG_2019_004 $p Palacký University Olomouc $2 Czech Republic
LZP    __
$b NLK138 $a Pubmed-20230207

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace