-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Should minimally invasive approaches in rectal surgery be regarded as a key element of modern enhanced recovery perioperative care
P. Kocián, F. Pazdírek, P. Přikryl, T. Vymazal, J. Hoch, A. Whitley
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
- MeSH
- chirurgie trávicího traktu * metody MeSH
- délka pobytu MeSH
- ileus * etiologie MeSH
- laparoskopie * metody MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- miniinvazivní chirurgické výkony škodlivé účinky metody MeSH
- perioperační péče metody MeSH
- pooperační komplikace epidemiologie etiologie MeSH
- střeva MeSH
- urychlená pooperační rehabilitace * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
INTRODUCTION: The aim of study was to assess the impact of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol and minimally invasive approaches on short-term outcomes in rectal surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A consecutive series of patients that underwent open or minimally invasive rectal resections in a single institution between January 2015 and April 2020 were included in the study. An ERAS program was introduced in April 2016. The study cohort was divided into three groups: open surgery without ERAS, open surgery with ERAS, and minimally invasive surgery with ERAS. Outcome measures compared were recovery parameters, surgical stress parameters, 30-day morbidity and mortality, oncological radicality and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: A total of 202 patients were included: 43 in the open non-ERAS group, 92 in the open ERAS group and 67 in the minimally invasive ERAS group. All recovery parameters apart from postoperative nausea and vomiting were significantly improved in both ERAS groups. Surgical stress parameters, prolonged postoperative ileus, and hospital stay were significantly reduced in the minimally invasive ERAS group. The overall 30-day morbidity and mortality and oncological radicality did not significantly differ among the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive approaches and enhanced recovery care in rectal surgery improve short-term outcomes. Their combination leads to an improvement in recovery parameters and a reduction of prolonged postoperative ileus and hospital stay.
Department of Anatomy 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Department of Surgery University Hospital Královské Vinohrady Prague Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc23003733
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20230425140838.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 230418s2023 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1080/00015458.2021.1971871 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)34423745
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Kocián, Petr $u Department of Surgery, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000254011827 $7 xx0118297
- 245 10
- $a Should minimally invasive approaches in rectal surgery be regarded as a key element of modern enhanced recovery perioperative care / $c P. Kocián, F. Pazdírek, P. Přikryl, T. Vymazal, J. Hoch, A. Whitley
- 520 9_
- $a INTRODUCTION: The aim of study was to assess the impact of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol and minimally invasive approaches on short-term outcomes in rectal surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A consecutive series of patients that underwent open or minimally invasive rectal resections in a single institution between January 2015 and April 2020 were included in the study. An ERAS program was introduced in April 2016. The study cohort was divided into three groups: open surgery without ERAS, open surgery with ERAS, and minimally invasive surgery with ERAS. Outcome measures compared were recovery parameters, surgical stress parameters, 30-day morbidity and mortality, oncological radicality and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: A total of 202 patients were included: 43 in the open non-ERAS group, 92 in the open ERAS group and 67 in the minimally invasive ERAS group. All recovery parameters apart from postoperative nausea and vomiting were significantly improved in both ERAS groups. Surgical stress parameters, prolonged postoperative ileus, and hospital stay were significantly reduced in the minimally invasive ERAS group. The overall 30-day morbidity and mortality and oncological radicality did not significantly differ among the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive approaches and enhanced recovery care in rectal surgery improve short-term outcomes. Their combination leads to an improvement in recovery parameters and a reduction of prolonged postoperative ileus and hospital stay.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a perioperační péče $x metody $7 D019990
- 650 _2
- $a střeva $7 D007422
- 650 12
- $a chirurgie trávicího traktu $x metody $7 D013505
- 650 12
- $a urychlená pooperační rehabilitace $7 D000080482
- 650 _2
- $a pooperační komplikace $x epidemiologie $x etiologie $7 D011183
- 650 _2
- $a miniinvazivní chirurgické výkony $x škodlivé účinky $x metody $7 D019060
- 650 12
- $a ileus $x etiologie $7 D045823
- 650 _2
- $a délka pobytu $7 D007902
- 650 12
- $a laparoskopie $x metody $7 D010535
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Pazdírek, Filip $u Department of Surgery, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Přikryl, Petr $u Department of Anaesthesiology and ICM, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Vymazal, Tomáš $u Department of Anaesthesiology and ICM, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Hoch, Jiří $u Department of Surgery, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Whitley, Adam $u Department of Surgery, University Hospital Královské Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic $u Department of Anatomy, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00000059 $t Acta chirurgica Belgica $x 0001-5458 $g Roč. 123, č. 2 (2023), s. 163-169
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34423745 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20230418 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20230425140834 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1924421 $s 1189942
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2023 $b 123 $c 2 $d 163-169 $e 20210830 $i 0001-5458 $m Acta chirurgica belgica $n Acta Chir Belg $x MED00000059
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20230418
