-
Something wrong with this record ?
Inguinal hernia treatment in Switzerland: inpatient vs. outpatient setting - HerStAmb Study (prospective observational two-centre comparative study)
M. Ziga, L. Burla, A. Imhof, T. Gürtler, M. Weber
Language English Country Germany
Document type Observational Study, Journal Article
NLK
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2000-01-01 to 1 year ago
Springer Nature OA/Free Journals
from 1872-03-01
- MeSH
- Surgical Mesh MeSH
- Inpatients MeSH
- Hernia, Inguinal * surgery MeSH
- Quality of Life MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Herniorrhaphy adverse effects MeSH
- Outpatients MeSH
- Prospective Studies MeSH
- Recurrence MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Observational Study MeSH
- Geographicals
- Switzerland MeSH
PURPOSE: Since 01/2018, AVOS (ambulant vor stationär = outpatient to inpatient) regulation has been progressively implemented in hernia surgery in Switzerland. The aim of this prospective, observational, two-centre comparative study was to compare the outcome of outpatient and inpatient post-operative care in terms of AVOS by examining the re-admission rate, complication rate and quality of life in patients with primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair. METHODS: The study ran between 01/2019 and 04/2020 and included 237 patients with a primary unilateral inguinal hernia. Treatment setting was decided according to AVOS guidelines. Primary endpoint was re-admission rate within 6 weeks postoperatively. Secondary endpoints were the complication rate and patient outcome (quality of life) at 6 weeks follow-up postoperatively, as measured by the Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36). RESULTS: Complications occurred in 11 (14%) inpatient patients, but none required re-admitting for revision until follow-up at 6 weeks after discharge. In the outpatient group, there were 27 (17%) complications reported, while 6 (4%) of these patients crossed over to the inpatient group immediately after surgery. None of the other complications required re-admission until follow-up at 6 weeks. No significant relationship between treatment setting and number of complications/re-admission rate (p=0.458, p=0.061) was observed. The mean outcome (SF-36) between the treatment groups was not significantly different (p=0.16-0.856). CONCLUSION: In terms of AVOS selection criteria in Switzerland, primary unilateral inguinal hernia can be safely treated in both treatment settings. Re-admission rates, complications and quality of life do not significantly differ. Day surgery in terms of AVOS might be as effective and efficient, both from the patient's perspective and that of the institution. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05234242.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc23004636
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20230425171633.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 230418s2023 gw f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s00423-023-02766-y $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)36622458
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gw
- 100 1_
- $a Ziga, Michal $u Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Schaffhausen, Geisbergstrasse 81, CH-8208, Schaffhausen, Switzerland. michal.ziga@gmail.com $u Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. michal.ziga@gmail.com $u 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. michal.ziga@gmail.com $1 https://orcid.org/000000018071246X
- 245 10
- $a Inguinal hernia treatment in Switzerland: inpatient vs. outpatient setting - HerStAmb Study (prospective observational two-centre comparative study) / $c M. Ziga, L. Burla, A. Imhof, T. Gürtler, M. Weber
- 520 9_
- $a PURPOSE: Since 01/2018, AVOS (ambulant vor stationär = outpatient to inpatient) regulation has been progressively implemented in hernia surgery in Switzerland. The aim of this prospective, observational, two-centre comparative study was to compare the outcome of outpatient and inpatient post-operative care in terms of AVOS by examining the re-admission rate, complication rate and quality of life in patients with primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair. METHODS: The study ran between 01/2019 and 04/2020 and included 237 patients with a primary unilateral inguinal hernia. Treatment setting was decided according to AVOS guidelines. Primary endpoint was re-admission rate within 6 weeks postoperatively. Secondary endpoints were the complication rate and patient outcome (quality of life) at 6 weeks follow-up postoperatively, as measured by the Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36). RESULTS: Complications occurred in 11 (14%) inpatient patients, but none required re-admitting for revision until follow-up at 6 weeks after discharge. In the outpatient group, there were 27 (17%) complications reported, while 6 (4%) of these patients crossed over to the inpatient group immediately after surgery. None of the other complications required re-admission until follow-up at 6 weeks. No significant relationship between treatment setting and number of complications/re-admission rate (p=0.458, p=0.061) was observed. The mean outcome (SF-36) between the treatment groups was not significantly different (p=0.16-0.856). CONCLUSION: In terms of AVOS selection criteria in Switzerland, primary unilateral inguinal hernia can be safely treated in both treatment settings. Re-admission rates, complications and quality of life do not significantly differ. Day surgery in terms of AVOS might be as effective and efficient, both from the patient's perspective and that of the institution. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05234242.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a inguinální hernie $x chirurgie $7 D006552
- 650 _2
- $a hospitalizovaní pacienti $7 D007297
- 650 _2
- $a pacienti ambulantní $7 D010045
- 650 _2
- $a kvalita života $7 D011788
- 650 _2
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 650 _2
- $a operace kýly $x škodlivé účinky $7 D059685
- 650 _2
- $a recidiva $7 D012008
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a chirurgické síťky $7 D013526
- 651 _2
- $a Švýcarsko $7 D013557
- 655 _2
- $a pozorovací studie $7 D064888
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Burla, Laurin $u Department of Visceral-, Thoracic- and Vascular Surgery, Triemli City Hospital, Birmensdorferstrasse 497, CH-8063, Zurich, Switzerland
- 700 1_
- $a Imhof, Adrienne $u Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Schaffhausen, Geisbergstrasse 81, CH-8208, Schaffhausen, Switzerland
- 700 1_
- $a Gürtler, Thomas $u Department of Visceral-, Thoracic- and Vascular Surgery, Triemli City Hospital, Birmensdorferstrasse 497, CH-8063, Zurich, Switzerland
- 700 1_
- $a Weber, Markus $u Department of Visceral-, Thoracic- and Vascular Surgery, Triemli City Hospital, Birmensdorferstrasse 497, CH-8063, Zurich, Switzerland
- 773 0_
- $w MED00005024 $t Langenbeck's archives of surgery $x 1435-2451 $g Roč. 408, č. 1 (2023), s. 14
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36622458 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20230418 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20230425171629 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1924994 $s 1190845
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2023 $b 408 $c 1 $d 14 $e 20230109 $i 1435-2451 $m Langenbeck's archives of surgery $n Langenbecks Arch Surg $x MED00005024
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20230418