Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Nanofiber Wound Dressing Materials-A Comparative Study of Wound Healing on a Porcine Model

K. Menclová, P. Svoboda, J. Hadač, Š. Juhás, J. Juhásová, J. Pejchal, V. Mandys, K. Eminger, M. Ryska

. 2023 ; 188 (1-2) : e133-e139. [pub] 2023Jan04

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc23004658

BACKGROUND: Nanofiber wound dressings remain the domain of in vitro studies. The purpose of our study was to verify the benefits of chitosan (CTS) and polylactide (PLA)-based nanofiber wound dressings on a porcine model of a naturally contaminated standardized wound and compare them with the conventional dressings, i.e., gauze and Inadine. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study group included 32 pigs randomized into four homogeneous groups according to the wound dressing type. Standardized wounds were created on their backs, and wound dressings were regularly changed. We evaluated difficulty of handling individual dressing materials and macroscopic appearance of the wounds. Wound swabs were taken for bacteriological examination. Blood samples were obtained to determine blood count values and serum levels of acute phase proteins (serum amyloid A, C-reactive protein, and haptoglobin). The crucial point of the study was histological analysis. Microscopic evaluation was focused on the defect depth and tissue reactions, including formation of the fibrin exudate with neutrophil granulocytes, the layer of granulation and cellular connective tissue, and the reepithelialization. Statistical analysis was performed by using SPSS software. The analysis was based on the Kruskal-Wallis H test and Mann-Whitney U test followed by Bonferroni correction. Significance was set at P < .05. RESULTS: Macroscopic examination did not show any difference in wound healing among the groups. However, evaluation of histological findings demonstrated that PLA-based nanofiber dressing accelerated the proliferative (P = .025) and reepithelialization (P < .001) healing phases, while chitosan-based nanofiber dressing potentiated and accelerated the inflammatory phase (P = .006). No statistically significant changes were observed in the blood count or acute inflammatory phase proteins during the trial. Different dynamics were noted in serum amyloid A values in the group treated with PLA-based nanofiber dressing (P = .006). CONCLUSION: Based on the microscopic examination, we have documented a positive effect of nanofiber wound dressings on acceleration of individual phases of the healing process. Nanofiber wound dressings have a potential to become in future part of the common wound care practice.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc23004658
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20230425171640.0
007      
ta
008      
230418s2023 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1093/milmed/usab155 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)33959775
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Menclová, Katerina $u Department of Surgery, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Military University Hospital Prague and Charles University, Prague 169 02, Czechia
245    10
$a Nanofiber Wound Dressing Materials-A Comparative Study of Wound Healing on a Porcine Model / $c K. Menclová, P. Svoboda, J. Hadač, Š. Juhás, J. Juhásová, J. Pejchal, V. Mandys, K. Eminger, M. Ryska
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Nanofiber wound dressings remain the domain of in vitro studies. The purpose of our study was to verify the benefits of chitosan (CTS) and polylactide (PLA)-based nanofiber wound dressings on a porcine model of a naturally contaminated standardized wound and compare them with the conventional dressings, i.e., gauze and Inadine. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study group included 32 pigs randomized into four homogeneous groups according to the wound dressing type. Standardized wounds were created on their backs, and wound dressings were regularly changed. We evaluated difficulty of handling individual dressing materials and macroscopic appearance of the wounds. Wound swabs were taken for bacteriological examination. Blood samples were obtained to determine blood count values and serum levels of acute phase proteins (serum amyloid A, C-reactive protein, and haptoglobin). The crucial point of the study was histological analysis. Microscopic evaluation was focused on the defect depth and tissue reactions, including formation of the fibrin exudate with neutrophil granulocytes, the layer of granulation and cellular connective tissue, and the reepithelialization. Statistical analysis was performed by using SPSS software. The analysis was based on the Kruskal-Wallis H test and Mann-Whitney U test followed by Bonferroni correction. Significance was set at P < .05. RESULTS: Macroscopic examination did not show any difference in wound healing among the groups. However, evaluation of histological findings demonstrated that PLA-based nanofiber dressing accelerated the proliferative (P = .025) and reepithelialization (P < .001) healing phases, while chitosan-based nanofiber dressing potentiated and accelerated the inflammatory phase (P = .006). No statistically significant changes were observed in the blood count or acute inflammatory phase proteins during the trial. Different dynamics were noted in serum amyloid A values in the group treated with PLA-based nanofiber dressing (P = .006). CONCLUSION: Based on the microscopic examination, we have documented a positive effect of nanofiber wound dressings on acceleration of individual phases of the healing process. Nanofiber wound dressings have a potential to become in future part of the common wound care practice.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a prasata $7 D013552
650    12
$a nanovlákna $x terapeutické užití $7 D057139
650    12
$a chitosan $x farmakologie $x terapeutické užití $7 D048271
650    _2
$a sérový amyloid A $x farmakologie $7 D000685
650    _2
$a hojení ran $7 D014945
650    _2
$a obvazy $7 D001458
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Svoboda, Petr $u Department of Surgery, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Military University Hospital Prague and Charles University, Prague 169 02, Czechia
700    1_
$a Hadač, Jan $u Department of Surgery, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Military University Hospital Prague and Charles University, Prague 169 02, Czechia
700    1_
$a Juhás, Štefan $u Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics of the Academy of Sciences CR, Lib ěchov 277 21, Czechia
700    1_
$a Juhásová, Jana $u Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics of the Academy of Sciences CR, Lib ěchov 277 21, Czechia
700    1_
$a Pejchal, Jaroslav $u Department of Toxicology and Military Pharmacy, Faculty of Military Health Sciences, University of Defence, Hradec Králové 500 02, Czechia
700    1_
$a Mandys, Václav $u Department of Pathology, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Královské Vinohrady, Prague 100 34, Czechia
700    1_
$a Eminger, Karel $u Department of Scientific Information and Clinical Studies, Central Military University Hospital Prague, Prague 169 02, Czechia
700    1_
$a Ryska, Miroslav $u Department of Surgery, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Military University Hospital Prague and Charles University, Prague 169 02, Czechia
773    0_
$w MED00003360 $t Military medicine $x 1930-613X $g Roč. 188, č. 1-2 (2023), s. e133-e139
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33959775 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20230418 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20230425171636 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1925007 $s 1190867
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 188 $c 1-2 $d e133-e139 $e 2023Jan04 $i 1930-613X $m Military medicine $n Mil Med $x MED00003360
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20230418

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...