-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Effect of an overhead goal on landing error scoring system and jump height measures
K. Hébert-Losier, C. Boswell-Smith, I. Hanzlíková
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie
NLK
ProQuest Central
od 2003-01-01 do Před 2 měsíci
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2003-01-01 do Před 2 měsíci
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2003-01-01 do Před 2 měsíci
Health Management Database (ProQuest)
od 2003-01-01 do Před 2 měsíci
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2003-01-01 do Před 2 měsíci
- MeSH
- klinické křížové studie MeSH
- kolenní kloub MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- pohyb MeSH
- poranění předního zkříženého vazu * MeSH
- sporty * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
OBJECTIVES: Compare overall Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) scores, risk categorisation, specific LESS errors, and double-leg jump-landing jump heights between overhead goal and no goal conditions. DESIGN: Randomised cross-over. SETTING: Laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: 76 (51% male). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participants landed from a 30-cm box to 50% of their body height and immediately jumped vertically for maximum height. Participants completed three trials under two random-ordered conditions: with and without overhead goal. Group-level mean LESS scores, risk categorisation (5-error threshold), specific landing errors, and jump heights were compared between conditions. RESULTS: Mean LESS scores were greater (0.3 errors, p < 0.001) with the overhead goal, but this small difference was not clinically meaningful. Similarly, although the number of high-risk participants was greater with the overhead goal (p = 0.039), the 9.2% difference was trivial. Participants jumped 2.7 cm higher with the overhead goal (p < 0.001) without affecting the occurrence of any specific LESS errors. DISCUSSION: Performing the LESS with an overhead goal enhances sport specificity and elicits greater vertical jump performances with minimal change in landing errors and injury-risk categorisation. Adding an overhead goal to LESS might enhance its suitability for injury risk screening, although the predictive value of LESS with an overhead goal needs confirmation.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc23004737
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20230425171707.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 230418s2023 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.ptsp.2022.11.005 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)36528004
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Hébert-Losier, Kim $u Division of Health, Engineering, Computing and Science, Te Huataki Waiora School of Health, University of Waikato, Adams Centre for High Performance, 52 Miro Street, 3116, Tauranga, New Zealand. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/KimHebertLosier
- 245 10
- $a Effect of an overhead goal on landing error scoring system and jump height measures / $c K. Hébert-Losier, C. Boswell-Smith, I. Hanzlíková
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVES: Compare overall Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) scores, risk categorisation, specific LESS errors, and double-leg jump-landing jump heights between overhead goal and no goal conditions. DESIGN: Randomised cross-over. SETTING: Laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: 76 (51% male). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participants landed from a 30-cm box to 50% of their body height and immediately jumped vertically for maximum height. Participants completed three trials under two random-ordered conditions: with and without overhead goal. Group-level mean LESS scores, risk categorisation (5-error threshold), specific landing errors, and jump heights were compared between conditions. RESULTS: Mean LESS scores were greater (0.3 errors, p < 0.001) with the overhead goal, but this small difference was not clinically meaningful. Similarly, although the number of high-risk participants was greater with the overhead goal (p = 0.039), the 9.2% difference was trivial. Participants jumped 2.7 cm higher with the overhead goal (p < 0.001) without affecting the occurrence of any specific LESS errors. DISCUSSION: Performing the LESS with an overhead goal enhances sport specificity and elicits greater vertical jump performances with minimal change in landing errors and injury-risk categorisation. Adding an overhead goal to LESS might enhance its suitability for injury risk screening, although the predictive value of LESS with an overhead goal needs confirmation.
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 12
- $a poranění předního zkříženého vazu $7 D000070598
- 650 _2
- $a kolenní kloub $7 D007719
- 650 _2
- $a pohyb $7 D009068
- 650 12
- $a sporty $7 D013177
- 650 _2
- $a klinické křížové studie $7 D018592
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
- 700 1_
- $a Boswell-Smith, Caleb $u Division of Health, Engineering, Computing and Science, Te Huataki Waiora School of Health, University of Waikato, Adams Centre for High Performance, 52 Miro Street, 3116, Tauranga, New Zealand
- 700 1_
- $a Hanzlíková, Ivana $u Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacký University Olomouc, Třída Míru 177, Olomouc, 771 11, Czech Republic. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/HanzlikovaIvana
- 773 0_
- $w MED00167392 $t Physical therapy in sport : official journal of the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Sports Medicine $x 1873-1600 $g Roč. 59, č. - (2023), s. 115-121
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36528004 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20230418 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20230425171704 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1925058 $s 1190946
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2023 $b 59 $c - $d 115-121 $e 20221124 $i 1873-1600 $m Physical therapy in sport $n Phys Ther Sport $x MED00167392
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20230418
