Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Chirurgická léčba degenerativní lumbální stenózy a spondylolistézy: klinický doporučený postup
[Surgical Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Stenosis and Spondylolisthesis: Clinical Practice Guideline]

R. Kaiser, L. Kantorová, A. Langaufová, S. Slezáková, D. Tučková, M. Klugar, Z. Klézl, P. Barsa, J. Cienciala, R. Hajdúk, L. Hrabálek, R. Kučera, D. Netuka, M. Prýmek, M. Repko, M. Smrčka, J. Štulík

. 2023 ; 90 (3) : 157-167. [pub] -

Language Czech Country Czech Republic

Document type Systematic Review, English Abstract, Journal Article

Digital library NLK
Source

E-resources Online

NLK Free Medical Journals from 2006

Links

PubMed 37395422

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY This article presents the evidence and the rationale for the recommendations for surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar stenosis (DLS) and spondylolisthesis that were recently developed as a part of the Czech Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) "The Surgical Treatment of the Degenerative Diseases of the Spine". MATERIAL AND METHODS The Guideline was drawn up in line with the Czech National Methodology of the CPG Development, which is based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. We used an innovative GRADE-adolopment method that combines adoption and adaptation of the existing guidelines with de novo development of recommendations. In this paper, we present three adapted recommendations on DLS and a recommendation on spondylolisthesis developed de novo by the Czech team. RESULTS Open surgical decompression in DLS patients has been evaluated in three randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A recommendation in favour of decompression was made based on a statistically significant and clinically evident improvement in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and leg pain. Decompression may be recommended for patients with symptoms of DLS in the event of correlation of significant physical limitation and the finding obtained via imaging. The authors of a systematic review of observational studies and one RCT conclude that fusion has a negligible role in the case of a simple DLS. Thus, spondylodesis should only be chosen as an adjunct to decompression in selected DLS patients. Two RCTs compared supervised rehabilitation with home or no exercise, showing no statistically significant difference between the procedures. The guideline group considers the post-surgery physical activity beneficial and suggests supervised rehabilitation in patients who have undergone surgery for DLS for the beneficial effects of exercise in the absence of known adverse effects. Four RCTs were found comparing simple decompression and decompression with fusion in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. None of the outcomes showed clinically significant improvement or deterioration in favour of either intervention. The guideline group concluded that for stable spondylolisthesis the results of both methods are comparable and, when other parameters are considered (balance of benefits and risks, or costs), point in favour of simple decompression. Due to the lack of scientific evidence, no recommendation has been formulated regarding unstable spondylolisthesis. The certainty of the evidence was rated as low for all recommendations. DISCUSSION Despite the unclear definition of stable/unstable slip, the inclusion of apparently unstable cases of DS in stable studies limits the conclusions of the studies. Based on the available literature, however, it can be summarized that in simple degenerative lumbar stenosis and static spondylolisthesis, fusion of the given segment is not justified. However, its use in the case of unstable (dynamic) vertebral slip is undisputable for the time being. CONCLUSIONS The guideline development group suggests decompression in patients with DLS in whom previous conservative treatment did not lead to improvement, spondylodesis only in selected patients, and post-surgical supervised rehabilitation. In patients with degenerative lumbar stenosis and spondylolisthesis with no signs of instability, the guideline development group suggests simple decompression (without fusion). Key words: degenerative lumbar stenosis, degenerative spondylolisthesis, spinal fusion, Clinical Practice Guideline, GRADE, adolopment.

Surgical Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Stenosis and Spondylolisthesis: Clinical Practice Guideline

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc23008969
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20230802075153.0
007      
ta
008      
230707s2023 xr a f 000 0|cze||
009      
AR
024    7_
$2 doi $a 10.55095/achot2023/021
035    __
$a (PubMed)37395422
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a cze $b eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Kaiser, Radek, $u Neurochirurgická a neuroonkologická klinika 1. lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy a Ústřední vojenské nemocnice, Praha $d 1982- $7 xx0189785
245    10
$a Chirurgická léčba degenerativní lumbální stenózy a spondylolistézy: klinický doporučený postup / $c R. Kaiser, L. Kantorová, A. Langaufová, S. Slezáková, D. Tučková, M. Klugar, Z. Klézl, P. Barsa, J. Cienciala, R. Hajdúk, L. Hrabálek, R. Kučera, D. Netuka, M. Prýmek, M. Repko, M. Smrčka, J. Štulík
246    31
$a Surgical Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Stenosis and Spondylolisthesis: Clinical Practice Guideline
520    9_
$a PURPOSE OF THE STUDY This article presents the evidence and the rationale for the recommendations for surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar stenosis (DLS) and spondylolisthesis that were recently developed as a part of the Czech Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) "The Surgical Treatment of the Degenerative Diseases of the Spine". MATERIAL AND METHODS The Guideline was drawn up in line with the Czech National Methodology of the CPG Development, which is based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. We used an innovative GRADE-adolopment method that combines adoption and adaptation of the existing guidelines with de novo development of recommendations. In this paper, we present three adapted recommendations on DLS and a recommendation on spondylolisthesis developed de novo by the Czech team. RESULTS Open surgical decompression in DLS patients has been evaluated in three randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A recommendation in favour of decompression was made based on a statistically significant and clinically evident improvement in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and leg pain. Decompression may be recommended for patients with symptoms of DLS in the event of correlation of significant physical limitation and the finding obtained via imaging. The authors of a systematic review of observational studies and one RCT conclude that fusion has a negligible role in the case of a simple DLS. Thus, spondylodesis should only be chosen as an adjunct to decompression in selected DLS patients. Two RCTs compared supervised rehabilitation with home or no exercise, showing no statistically significant difference between the procedures. The guideline group considers the post-surgery physical activity beneficial and suggests supervised rehabilitation in patients who have undergone surgery for DLS for the beneficial effects of exercise in the absence of known adverse effects. Four RCTs were found comparing simple decompression and decompression with fusion in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. None of the outcomes showed clinically significant improvement or deterioration in favour of either intervention. The guideline group concluded that for stable spondylolisthesis the results of both methods are comparable and, when other parameters are considered (balance of benefits and risks, or costs), point in favour of simple decompression. Due to the lack of scientific evidence, no recommendation has been formulated regarding unstable spondylolisthesis. The certainty of the evidence was rated as low for all recommendations. DISCUSSION Despite the unclear definition of stable/unstable slip, the inclusion of apparently unstable cases of DS in stable studies limits the conclusions of the studies. Based on the available literature, however, it can be summarized that in simple degenerative lumbar stenosis and static spondylolisthesis, fusion of the given segment is not justified. However, its use in the case of unstable (dynamic) vertebral slip is undisputable for the time being. CONCLUSIONS The guideline development group suggests decompression in patients with DLS in whom previous conservative treatment did not lead to improvement, spondylodesis only in selected patients, and post-surgical supervised rehabilitation. In patients with degenerative lumbar stenosis and spondylolisthesis with no signs of instability, the guideline development group suggests simple decompression (without fusion). Key words: degenerative lumbar stenosis, degenerative spondylolisthesis, spinal fusion, Clinical Practice Guideline, GRADE, adolopment.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a spondylolistéza $x komplikace $x chirurgie $7 D013168
650    _2
$a stenóza $x chirurgie $7 D003251
650    12
$a spinální stenóza $x chirurgie $7 D013130
650    _2
$a bederní obratle $x chirurgie $7 D008159
650    _2
$a chirurgická dekomprese $x metody $7 D019299
650    12
$a fúze páteře $7 D013123
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
655    _2
$a systematický přehled $7 D000078182
655    _2
$a anglický abstrakt $7 D004740
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Kantorová, Lucia $u České národní centrum Evidence-Based Healthcare a Knowledge Translation (Cochrane Czech Republic, Czech EBHC: JBI Centre of Excellence, Masaryk University GRADE Centre), Institut biostatistiky a analýz, Lékařská fakulta, Masarykova univerzita, Brno $u Agentura pro zdravotnický výzkum České republiky, Praha $7 xx0258035
700    1_
$a Langaufová, A. $u České národní centrum Evidence-Based Healthcare a Knowledge Translation (Cochrane Czech Republic, Czech EBHC: JBI Centre of Excellence, Masaryk University GRADE Centre), Institut biostatistiky a analýz, Lékařská fakulta, Masarykova univerzita, Brno $u Ústav zdravotnických informací a statistiky České republiky, Praha
700    1_
$a Slezáková, Simona $u České národní centrum Evidence-Based Healthcare a Knowledge Translation (Cochrane Czech Republic, Czech EBHC: JBI Centre of Excellence, Masaryk University GRADE Centre), Institut biostatistiky a analýz, Lékařská fakulta, Masarykova univerzita, Brno $u Agentura pro zdravotnický výzkum České republiky, Praha $u Ústav zdravotnických informací a statistiky České republiky, Praha $7 xx0234038
700    1_
$a Tučková, D. $u České národní centrum Evidence-Based Healthcare a Knowledge Translation (Cochrane Czech Republic, Czech EBHC: JBI Centre of Excellence, Masaryk University GRADE Centre), Institut biostatistiky a analýz, Lékařská fakulta, Masarykova univerzita, Brno $u Agentura pro zdravotnický výzkum České republiky, Praha
700    1_
$a Klugar, Miloslav, $u České národní centrum Evidence-Based Healthcare a Knowledge Translation (Cochrane Czech Republic, Czech EBHC: JBI Centre of Excellence, Masaryk University GRADE Centre), Institut biostatistiky a analýz, Lékařská fakulta, Masarykova univerzita, Brno $u Agentura pro zdravotnický výzkum České republiky, Praha $u Ústav zdravotnických informací a statistiky České republiky, Praha $d 1982- $7 mzk2015879957
700    1_
$a Klézl, Zdeněk $u Klinika spondylochirurgie 1. lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy a Fakultní nemocnice v Motole, Praha $7 xx0081733
700    1_
$a Barsa, Pavel $u Neurochirurgické oddělení, Neurocentrum, Krajská nemocnice Liberec, Liberec $7 jx20070719015
700    1_
$a Cienciala, Jan $u Ortopedická klinika Lékařské fakulty Masarykovy univerzity a Fakultní nemocnice Brno, Brno $7 xx0107203
700    1_
$a Hajdúk, R. $u Klinika spondylochirurgie 1. lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy a Fakultní nemocnice v Motole, Praha
700    1_
$a Hrabálek, Lumír $u Neurochirurgická klinika Lékařské fakulty Univerzity Palackého a Fakultní nemocnice Olomouc, Olomouc $7 xx0076898
700    1_
$a Kučera, Roman $u Neurochirurgické oddělení, Nemocnice Na Homolce, Praha $7 xx0304649
700    1_
$a Netuka, David $u Neurochirurgická a neuroonkologická klinika 1. lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy a Ústřední vojenské nemocnice, Praha $7 xx0061783
700    1_
$a Prýmek, Martin $u Ortopedická klinika Lékařské fakulty Masarykovy univerzity a Fakultní nemocnice Brno, Brno $7 xx0224268
700    1_
$a Repko, Martin, $u Ortopedická klinika Lékařské fakulty Masarykovy univerzity a Fakultní nemocnice Brno, Brno $d 1967- $7 mzk2004221769
700    1_
$a Smrčka, Martin, $u Neurochirurgická klinika Lékařské fakulty Masarykovy univerzity a Fakultní nemocnice Brno, Brno $d 1965- $7 xx0000301
700    1_
$a Štulík, Jan, $u Klinika spondylochirurgie 1. lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy a Fakultní nemocnice v Motole, Praha $d 1967- $7 nlk20030127573
773    0_
$w MED00011021 $t Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca $x 0001-5415 $g Roč. 90, č. 3 (2023), s. 157-167
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37395422 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b A 8 $c 507 $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20230707 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20230802075149 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1964387 $s 1195232
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 90 $c 3 $d 157-167 $e - $i 0001-5415 $m Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca $n Acta chir. orthop. traumatol. Čechoslovaca $x MED00011021
LZP    __
$b NLK198 $a Pubmed-20230707

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...