Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Comparison of semi-quantitative and visual assessment of early MRI signal evolution in acute ischaemic stroke

J. Civrny, Z. Sedlackova, T. Malenak, P. Kucera, D. Machal, M. Kocher, D. Sanak, T. Furst, M. Cerna

. 2023 ; 10 (-) : 100488. [pub] 20230425

Status neindexováno Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc23009913

BACKGROUND: The evaluation of DWI/FLAIR mismatch in ischaemic stroke patients with unknown, time from onset can determine the treatment strategy. This approach is based on, visual assessment and may be subject to insufficient inter-rater agreement. OBJECTIVE: To compare the inter-rater agreement of visual evaluation of FLAIR MRI and proposed region of interest (ROI) semiquantitative method in large vessel occlusion (LVO) strokes. METHODS: Five readers have analysed MRIs of 104 patients obtained within six hours of the onset of stroke symptoms resulting from LVO visually and semi-quantitatively. For the semiquantitative analysis, a ROI method was used to obtain relative signal intensity compared to the unaffected side. Cut-off values of 1.15 and 1.10 were tested. The analysis yielded FLAIR-positive (abnormal) and negative (normal) findings. Percentage agreement and Fleiss kappa coefficients were calculated. RESULTS: The visual agreement of 5/5 readers and ≥ 4/5 readers occurred in 31% and 59% of cases respectively. Semi-quantitative evaluation using a cut-off value of 1.15 increased the agreements to 67% and 88% respectively. The agreement of visual evaluation was fair. The semi-quantitative method utilising the cut-off of 1.15 had moderate agreement although it increased the number of FLAIR-negative results compared to the visual evaluation. A low cut-off value of 1.10 didn't improve the agreement significantly. CONCLUSION: The inter-rater agreement of visual evaluation of FLAIR in patients with short-duration large vessel occlusion stroke was fair. The high cut-off value of semiquantitative evaluation increased the agreement although it changed the proportion of FLAIR positive and negative results.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc23009913
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250716134108.0
007      
ta
008      
230707e20230425enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.ejro.2023.100488 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)37168316
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Civrny, J $u Department of Radiology, Palacky University and University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic $u Faculty of Health Sciences, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Comparison of semi-quantitative and visual assessment of early MRI signal evolution in acute ischaemic stroke / $c J. Civrny, Z. Sedlackova, T. Malenak, P. Kucera, D. Machal, M. Kocher, D. Sanak, T. Furst, M. Cerna
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: The evaluation of DWI/FLAIR mismatch in ischaemic stroke patients with unknown, time from onset can determine the treatment strategy. This approach is based on, visual assessment and may be subject to insufficient inter-rater agreement. OBJECTIVE: To compare the inter-rater agreement of visual evaluation of FLAIR MRI and proposed region of interest (ROI) semiquantitative method in large vessel occlusion (LVO) strokes. METHODS: Five readers have analysed MRIs of 104 patients obtained within six hours of the onset of stroke symptoms resulting from LVO visually and semi-quantitatively. For the semiquantitative analysis, a ROI method was used to obtain relative signal intensity compared to the unaffected side. Cut-off values of 1.15 and 1.10 were tested. The analysis yielded FLAIR-positive (abnormal) and negative (normal) findings. Percentage agreement and Fleiss kappa coefficients were calculated. RESULTS: The visual agreement of 5/5 readers and ≥ 4/5 readers occurred in 31% and 59% of cases respectively. Semi-quantitative evaluation using a cut-off value of 1.15 increased the agreements to 67% and 88% respectively. The agreement of visual evaluation was fair. The semi-quantitative method utilising the cut-off of 1.15 had moderate agreement although it increased the number of FLAIR-negative results compared to the visual evaluation. A low cut-off value of 1.10 didn't improve the agreement significantly. CONCLUSION: The inter-rater agreement of visual evaluation of FLAIR in patients with short-duration large vessel occlusion stroke was fair. The high cut-off value of semiquantitative evaluation increased the agreement although it changed the proportion of FLAIR positive and negative results.
590    __
$a NEINDEXOVÁNO
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Sedlackova, Z $u Department of Radiology, Palacky University and University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic $u Faculty of Health Sciences, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Maleňák, Tomáš $u Department of Radiology, Palacky University and University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic $7 xx0334064
700    1_
$a Kucera, P $u Department of Radiology, Palacky University and University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Machal, D $u Department of Radiology, Palacky University and University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kocher, M $u Department of Radiology, Palacky University and University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Sanak, D $u Department of Neurology, Palacky University and University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Furst, T $u Department of Mathematical Analysis and Applications of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Palacky University Olomouc, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Cerna, M $u Department of Radiology, Palacky University and University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00211266 $t European journal of radiology open $x 2352-0477 $g Roč. 10 (20230425), s. 100488
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37168316 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20230707 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250716134050 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1958557 $s 1196177
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 10 $c - $d 100488 $e 20230425 $i 2352-0477 $m European journal of radiology open $n Eur J Radiol Open $x MED00211266
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20230707

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace