Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Novel stereological method for estimation of cell counts in 3D collagen scaffolds

A. Zavadakova, L. Vistejnova, T. Belinova, F. Tichanek, D. Bilikova, PR. Mouton

. 2023 ; 13 (1) : 7959. [pub] 20230517

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S., Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Current methods for assessing cell proliferation in 3D scaffolds rely on changes in metabolic activity or total DNA, however, direct quantification of cell number in 3D scaffolds remains a challenge. To address this issue, we developed an unbiased stereology approach that uses systematic-random sampling and thin focal-plane optical sectioning of the scaffolds followed by estimation of total cell number (StereoCount). This approach was validated against an indirect method for measuring the total DNA (DNA content); and the Bürker counting chamber, the current reference method for quantifying cell number. We assessed the total cell number for cell seeding density (cells per unit volume) across four values and compared the methods in terms of accuracy, ease-of-use and time demands. The accuracy of StereoCount markedly outperformed the DNA content for cases with ~ 10,000 and ~ 125,000 cells/scaffold. For cases with ~ 250,000 and ~ 375,000 cells/scaffold both StereoCount and DNA content showed lower accuracy than the Bürker but did not differ from each other. In terms of ease-of-use, there was a strong advantage for the StereoCount due to output in terms of absolute cell numbers along with the possibility for an overview of cell distribution and future use of automation for high throughput analysis. Taking together, the StereoCount method is an efficient approach for direct cell quantification in 3D collagen scaffolds. Its major benefit is that automated StereoCount could accelerate research using 3D scaffolds focused on drug discovery for a wide variety of human diseases.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc23011420
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250819101035.0
007      
ta
008      
230718s2023 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1038/s41598-023-35162-z $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)37198326
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Zavadakova, Anna $u Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Alej Svobody 76, Pilsen, Czech Republic. anna.zavadakova@gmail.com
245    10
$a Novel stereological method for estimation of cell counts in 3D collagen scaffolds / $c A. Zavadakova, L. Vistejnova, T. Belinova, F. Tichanek, D. Bilikova, PR. Mouton
520    9_
$a Current methods for assessing cell proliferation in 3D scaffolds rely on changes in metabolic activity or total DNA, however, direct quantification of cell number in 3D scaffolds remains a challenge. To address this issue, we developed an unbiased stereology approach that uses systematic-random sampling and thin focal-plane optical sectioning of the scaffolds followed by estimation of total cell number (StereoCount). This approach was validated against an indirect method for measuring the total DNA (DNA content); and the Bürker counting chamber, the current reference method for quantifying cell number. We assessed the total cell number for cell seeding density (cells per unit volume) across four values and compared the methods in terms of accuracy, ease-of-use and time demands. The accuracy of StereoCount markedly outperformed the DNA content for cases with ~ 10,000 and ~ 125,000 cells/scaffold. For cases with ~ 250,000 and ~ 375,000 cells/scaffold both StereoCount and DNA content showed lower accuracy than the Bürker but did not differ from each other. In terms of ease-of-use, there was a strong advantage for the StereoCount due to output in terms of absolute cell numbers along with the possibility for an overview of cell distribution and future use of automation for high throughput analysis. Taking together, the StereoCount method is an efficient approach for direct cell quantification in 3D collagen scaffolds. Its major benefit is that automated StereoCount could accelerate research using 3D scaffolds focused on drug discovery for a wide variety of human diseases.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a kolagen $7 D003094
650    _2
$a počet buněk $x metody $7 D002452
650    12
$a tkáňové podpůrné struktury $7 D054457
650    _2
$a tkáňové inženýrství $7 D023822
650    _2
$a proliferace buněk $7 D049109
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. $7 D013486
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Vistejnova, Lucie $u Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Alej Svobody 76, Pilsen, Czech Republic $u Department of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Alej Svobody 76, Pilsen, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Belinova, Tereza $u Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Alej Svobody 76, Pilsen, Czech Republic $u Imaging and Optics Facility, Institute of Science and Technology Austria, Am Campus 1, Klosterneuburg, Austria
700    1_
$a Tichánek, Filip $u Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Alej Svobody 76, Pilsen, Czech Republic $u Department of Pathological Physiology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Alej Svobody 76, Pilsen, Czech Republic $7 xx0334827
700    1_
$a Bilikova, Dagmar $u Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Alej Svobody 76, Pilsen, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Mouton, Peter R $u Department of Computer Sciences and Engineering, College of Engineering, University of South Florida, 4202 E Fowler Ave, Tampa, FL, USA $u SRC Biosciences, 1810 W. Kennedy Blvd, Tampa, FL, USA
773    0_
$w MED00182195 $t Scientific reports $x 2045-2322 $g Roč. 13, č. 1 (2023), s. 7959
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37198326 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20230718 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250819101017 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1963685 $s 1197685
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 13 $c 1 $d 7959 $e 20230517 $i 2045-2322 $m Scientific reports $n Sci Rep $x MED00182195
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20230718

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...