-
Something wrong with this record ?
Fully automated imaging protocol independent system for pituitary adenoma segmentation: a convolutional neural network-based model on sparsely annotated MRI
M. Černý, J. Kybic, M. Májovský, V. Sedlák, K. Pirgl, E. Misiorzová, R. Lipina, D. Netuka
Language English Country Germany
Document type Journal Article
- MeSH
- Adenoma * diagnostic imaging surgery MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging MeSH
- Pituitary Neoplasms * diagnostic imaging surgery MeSH
- Neural Networks, Computer MeSH
- Image Processing, Computer-Assisted methods MeSH
- Prospective Studies MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
This study aims to develop a fully automated imaging protocol independent system for pituitary adenoma segmentation from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans that can work without user interaction and evaluate its accuracy and utility for clinical applications. We trained two independent artificial neural networks on MRI scans of 394 patients. The scans were acquired according to various imaging protocols over the course of 11 years on 1.5T and 3T MRI systems. The segmentation model assigned a class label to each input pixel (pituitary adenoma, internal carotid artery, normal pituitary gland, background). The slice segmentation model classified slices as clinically relevant (structures of interest in slice) or irrelevant (anterior or posterior to sella turcica). We used MRI data of another 99 patients to evaluate the performance of the model during training. We validated the model on a prospective cohort of 28 patients, Dice coefficients of 0.910, 0.719, and 0.240 for tumour, internal carotid artery, and normal gland labels, respectively, were achieved. The slice selection model achieved 82.5% accuracy, 88.7% sensitivity, 76.7% specificity, and an AUC of 0.904. A human expert rated 71.4% of the segmentation results as accurate, 21.4% as slightly inaccurate, and 7.1% as coarsely inaccurate. Our model achieved good results comparable with recent works of other authors on the largest dataset to date and generalized well for various imaging protocols. We discussed future clinical applications, and their considerations. Models and frameworks for clinical use have yet to be developed and evaluated.
1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Kateřinská 1660 32 121 08 Praha 2 Czech Republic
3rd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Ruská 87 100 00 Praha 10 Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc23011456
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20230815090522.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 230718s2023 gw f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s10143-023-02014-3 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)37162632
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gw
- 100 1_
- $a Černý, Martin $u Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Central Military Hospital Prague, U Vojenské nemocnice 1200, 169 02, Praha 6, Czech Republic. dr.martin.cerny@gmail.com $u 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague, Kateřinská 1660/32, 121 08, Praha 2, Czech Republic. dr.martin.cerny@gmail.com $1 https://orcid.org/0000000286010554 $7 xx0304973
- 245 10
- $a Fully automated imaging protocol independent system for pituitary adenoma segmentation: a convolutional neural network-based model on sparsely annotated MRI / $c M. Černý, J. Kybic, M. Májovský, V. Sedlák, K. Pirgl, E. Misiorzová, R. Lipina, D. Netuka
- 520 9_
- $a This study aims to develop a fully automated imaging protocol independent system for pituitary adenoma segmentation from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans that can work without user interaction and evaluate its accuracy and utility for clinical applications. We trained two independent artificial neural networks on MRI scans of 394 patients. The scans were acquired according to various imaging protocols over the course of 11 years on 1.5T and 3T MRI systems. The segmentation model assigned a class label to each input pixel (pituitary adenoma, internal carotid artery, normal pituitary gland, background). The slice segmentation model classified slices as clinically relevant (structures of interest in slice) or irrelevant (anterior or posterior to sella turcica). We used MRI data of another 99 patients to evaluate the performance of the model during training. We validated the model on a prospective cohort of 28 patients, Dice coefficients of 0.910, 0.719, and 0.240 for tumour, internal carotid artery, and normal gland labels, respectively, were achieved. The slice selection model achieved 82.5% accuracy, 88.7% sensitivity, 76.7% specificity, and an AUC of 0.904. A human expert rated 71.4% of the segmentation results as accurate, 21.4% as slightly inaccurate, and 7.1% as coarsely inaccurate. Our model achieved good results comparable with recent works of other authors on the largest dataset to date and generalized well for various imaging protocols. We discussed future clinical applications, and their considerations. Models and frameworks for clinical use have yet to be developed and evaluated.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a nádory hypofýzy $x diagnostické zobrazování $x chirurgie $7 D010911
- 650 _2
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 650 _2
- $a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $7 D008279
- 650 _2
- $a neuronové sítě $7 D016571
- 650 12
- $a adenom $x diagnostické zobrazování $x chirurgie $7 D000236
- 650 _2
- $a počítačové zpracování obrazu $x metody $7 D007091
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Kybic, Jan $u Department of Cybernetics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Technická 2, 166 27, Praha 6, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000293634947 $7 xx0028484
- 700 1_
- $a Májovský, Martin $u Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Central Military Hospital Prague, U Vojenské nemocnice 1200, 169 02, Praha 6, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000177255181 $7 xx0228525
- 700 1_
- $a Sedlák, Vojtěch $u Department of Radiodiagnostics, Central Military Hospital Prague, U Vojenské nemocnice 1200, 169 02, Praha 6, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000170319680
- 700 1_
- $a Pirgl, Karin $u Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Central Military Hospital Prague, U Vojenské nemocnice 1200, 169 02, Praha 6, Czech Republic $u 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague, Ruská 87, 100 00, Praha 10, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000208262799
- 700 1_
- $a Misiorzová, Eva $u Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, University Hospital Ostrava, 17. listopadu 1790/5, 708 52, Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000229937900
- 700 1_
- $a Lipina, Radim $u Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, University Hospital Ostrava, 17. listopadu 1790/5, 708 52, Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000283881311
- 700 1_
- $a Netuka, David $u Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Central Military Hospital Prague, U Vojenské nemocnice 1200, 169 02, Praha 6, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000186094789 $7 xx0061783
- 773 0_
- $w MED00003513 $t Neurosurgical review $x 1437-2320 $g Roč. 46, č. 1 (2023), s. 116
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37162632 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20230718 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20230815090519 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1963706 $s 1197721
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2023 $b 46 $c 1 $d 116 $e 20230510 $i 1437-2320 $m Neurosurgical review $n Neurosurg Rev $x MED00003513
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20230718