• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Geographically varying associations between mentally unhealthy days and social vulnerability in the USA

KH. Lee, S. Lee, J. Ryu, S. Chun, J. Heo

. 2023 ; 222 (-) : 13-20. [pub] 20230725

Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc23016344

OBJECTIVES: A growing body of research has incorporated the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) into an expanded understanding of the social determinants of health. Although each component of SVI and its association with individual-level mental health conditions have been well discussed, variation in mentally unhealthy days (MUDs) at a county level is still unexplored. To systematically examine the geographically varying relationships between SVI and MUDs across the US counties, our study adopted two different methods: 1) aspatial regression modeling (ordinary least square [OLS]); and 2) locally calibrated spatial regression (geographically weighted regression [GWR]). STUDY DESIGN: This study used a cross-sectional statistical design and geospatial data manipulation/analysis techniques. Analytical unit is each of the 3109 counties in the continental USA. METHODS: We tested the model performance of two different methods and suggest using both methods to reduce potential issues (e.g., Simpson's paradox) when researchers apply aspatial analysis to spatially coded data sets. We applied GWR after checking the spatial dependence of residuals and non-stationary issues in OLS. GWR split a single OLS equation into 3109 equations for each county. RESULTS: Among 15 SVI variables, a combination of eight variables showed the best model performance. Notably, unemployment, person with a disability, and single-parent households with children aged under 18 years especially impacted the variation of MUDs in OLS. GWR showed better model performance than OLS and specified each county's varying relationships between subcomponents of SVI and MUDs. For example, GWR specified that 69.3% (2157 of 3109) of counties showed positive relationships between single-parent households and MUDs across the USA. Higher positive relationships were concentrated in Michigan, Kansas, Texas, and Louisiana. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings could contribute to the literature regarding social determinants of community mental health by specifying spatially varying relationships between SVI and MUDs across US counties. Regarding policy implementation, in counties containing more social and physical minorities (e.g., single-parent households and disabled population), policymakers should attend to these groups of people and increase intervention programs to reduce potential or current mental health illness. The results of GWR could help policymakers determine the specific counties that need more support to reduce regional mental health disparities.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc23016344
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20231026110015.0
007      
ta
008      
231013s2023 ne f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.puhe.2023.06.033 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)37499437
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ne
100    1_
$a Lee, Kyung Hee $u Department of Recreation, Parks and Leisure Services Administration, Central Michigan University, USA. Electronic address: lee8k@cmich.edu
245    10
$a Geographically varying associations between mentally unhealthy days and social vulnerability in the USA / $c KH. Lee, S. Lee, J. Ryu, S. Chun, J. Heo
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVES: A growing body of research has incorporated the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) into an expanded understanding of the social determinants of health. Although each component of SVI and its association with individual-level mental health conditions have been well discussed, variation in mentally unhealthy days (MUDs) at a county level is still unexplored. To systematically examine the geographically varying relationships between SVI and MUDs across the US counties, our study adopted two different methods: 1) aspatial regression modeling (ordinary least square [OLS]); and 2) locally calibrated spatial regression (geographically weighted regression [GWR]). STUDY DESIGN: This study used a cross-sectional statistical design and geospatial data manipulation/analysis techniques. Analytical unit is each of the 3109 counties in the continental USA. METHODS: We tested the model performance of two different methods and suggest using both methods to reduce potential issues (e.g., Simpson's paradox) when researchers apply aspatial analysis to spatially coded data sets. We applied GWR after checking the spatial dependence of residuals and non-stationary issues in OLS. GWR split a single OLS equation into 3109 equations for each county. RESULTS: Among 15 SVI variables, a combination of eight variables showed the best model performance. Notably, unemployment, person with a disability, and single-parent households with children aged under 18 years especially impacted the variation of MUDs in OLS. GWR showed better model performance than OLS and specified each county's varying relationships between subcomponents of SVI and MUDs. For example, GWR specified that 69.3% (2157 of 3109) of counties showed positive relationships between single-parent households and MUDs across the USA. Higher positive relationships were concentrated in Michigan, Kansas, Texas, and Louisiana. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings could contribute to the literature regarding social determinants of community mental health by specifying spatially varying relationships between SVI and MUDs across US counties. Regarding policy implementation, in counties containing more social and physical minorities (e.g., single-parent households and disabled population), policymakers should attend to these groups of people and increase intervention programs to reduce potential or current mental health illness. The results of GWR could help policymakers determine the specific counties that need more support to reduce regional mental health disparities.
650    _2
$a dítě $7 D002648
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mladiství $7 D000293
650    12
$a sociální zranitelnost $7 D000091482
650    _2
$a průřezové studie $7 D003430
650    12
$a prostorová regrese $7 D000068916
650    _2
$a prostorová analýza $7 D062206
651    _2
$a Michigan $7 D008824
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Lee, Sunwoo $u The Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacký University Olomouc, Třída Míru 117, 77111 Olomouc, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Ryu, Jungsu $u Department of Sport Management, Marshall University, USA
700    1_
$a Chun, Sanghee $u Department of Recreation & Leisure Studies, Brock University, Canada
700    1_
$a Heo, Jinmoo $u Department of Sports Industry Studies, Yonsei University, South Korea
773    0_
$w MED00004004 $t Public health $x 1476-5616 $g Roč. 222, č. - (2023), s. 13-20
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37499437 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20231013 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20231026110010 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2000078 $s 1202706
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 222 $c - $d 13-20 $e 20230725 $i 1476-5616 $m Public health $n Public Health $x MED00004004
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20231013

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...