-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Computed tomography is better than echocardiography in predicting balloon-expandable transcutaneous implantation valve size in a real-world clinical practice single-center study
K. Medilek, J. Bis, P. Polansky, T. Kvasnicka, A. Borg, J. Dusek, M. Brtko, M. Tuna, R. Praus, M. Ballon, J. Stasek, S. Littnerova, P. Parizek
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
Charles University, Czech Republic
NLK
CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCOhost)
od 2003-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2003-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
PubMed
37417924
DOI
10.1111/echo.15643
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- aortální chlopeň diagnostické zobrazování chirurgie MeSH
- aortální stenóza * diagnostické zobrazování chirurgie etiologie MeSH
- echokardiografie transezofageální metody MeSH
- echokardiografie metody MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- multidetektorová počítačová tomografie metody MeSH
- protézy - design MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- srdeční chlopně umělé * MeSH
- transkatetrální implantace aortální chlopně * metody MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
AIMS: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become the standard of care for selected patients with severe aortic stenosis. Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and transoesophageal 2D/3D (two-dimensional/three-dimensional) echocardiography (ECHO) are used for aortic annulus (AA) sizing. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of AA sizing by ECHO versus MDCT for Edwards Sapien balloon expandable valve in a single center. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from 145 consecutive patients with TAVR (Sapien XT or Sapien S3) were analyzed retrospectively. A total of 139 (96%) patients had favorable outcomes after TAVR (at most mild aortic regurgitation and only one valve implanted). The 3D ECHO AA area and area-derived diameter were smaller than the corresponding MDCT parameters (464 ± 99 vs. 479 ± 88 mm2 , p < .001, and 24.2 ± 2.7 vs. 25.0 ± 5.5 mm, p = .002, respectively). The 2D ECHO annulus measurement was smaller than both the MDCT and 3D ECHO area-derived diameters (22.6 ± 2.9 vs. 25.0 ± 5.5 mm, p = .013, and 22.6 ± 2.9 vs. 24.2 ± 2.7 mm, p < .001, respectively) but larger than the minor axis diameter of the AA derived from MDCT and 3D ECHO by multiplanar reconstruction (p < .001). The 3D ECHO circumference-derived diameter was also smaller than the MDCT circumference-derived diameter (24.3 ± 2.5 vs. 25.0 ± 2.3, p = .007). The sphericity index by 3D ECHO was smaller than that by MDCT (1.2 ± .1 vs. 1.3 ± .1, p < .001). In up to 1/3 of the patients, 3D ECHO measurements would have predicted different (generally smaller) valve size than was the valve size implanted with favorable result. The concordance of the implanted valve size with the recommended size based on preprocedural MDCT and 3D ECHO AA area was 79.4% versus 61% (p = .001), and for the area-derived diameter, the concordance was 80.1% versus 61.7% (p = .001). 2D ECHO diameter concordance was similar to MDCT (78.7%). CONCLUSIONS: 3D ECHO AA measurements are smaller than MDCT measurements. If 3D ECHO-based parameters alone are used to size the Edwards Sapien balloon expandable valve, then the selected valve size would have been smaller than the valve size implanted with favorable result in 1/3 of the patients. MDCT preprocedural TAVR assessment should be the preferred method over 3D ECHO in routine clinical practice to determine Edwards Sapien valve size.
Department of Cardioangiology University Hospital Hradec Kralove Hradec Kralove Czech Republic
Department of Radiology University Hospital Hradec Kralove Hradec Kralove Czech Republic
Faculty of Medicine Hradec Kralove Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc23016669
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20231026105634.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 231013s2023 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1111/echo.15643 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)37417924
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Medilek, Karel $u Department of Cardioangiology, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic $u Faculty of Medicine Hradec Kralove, Charles University Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000215109186 $7 xx0277035
- 245 10
- $a Computed tomography is better than echocardiography in predicting balloon-expandable transcutaneous implantation valve size in a real-world clinical practice single-center study / $c K. Medilek, J. Bis, P. Polansky, T. Kvasnicka, A. Borg, J. Dusek, M. Brtko, M. Tuna, R. Praus, M. Ballon, J. Stasek, S. Littnerova, P. Parizek
- 520 9_
- $a AIMS: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become the standard of care for selected patients with severe aortic stenosis. Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and transoesophageal 2D/3D (two-dimensional/three-dimensional) echocardiography (ECHO) are used for aortic annulus (AA) sizing. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of AA sizing by ECHO versus MDCT for Edwards Sapien balloon expandable valve in a single center. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from 145 consecutive patients with TAVR (Sapien XT or Sapien S3) were analyzed retrospectively. A total of 139 (96%) patients had favorable outcomes after TAVR (at most mild aortic regurgitation and only one valve implanted). The 3D ECHO AA area and area-derived diameter were smaller than the corresponding MDCT parameters (464 ± 99 vs. 479 ± 88 mm2 , p < .001, and 24.2 ± 2.7 vs. 25.0 ± 5.5 mm, p = .002, respectively). The 2D ECHO annulus measurement was smaller than both the MDCT and 3D ECHO area-derived diameters (22.6 ± 2.9 vs. 25.0 ± 5.5 mm, p = .013, and 22.6 ± 2.9 vs. 24.2 ± 2.7 mm, p < .001, respectively) but larger than the minor axis diameter of the AA derived from MDCT and 3D ECHO by multiplanar reconstruction (p < .001). The 3D ECHO circumference-derived diameter was also smaller than the MDCT circumference-derived diameter (24.3 ± 2.5 vs. 25.0 ± 2.3, p = .007). The sphericity index by 3D ECHO was smaller than that by MDCT (1.2 ± .1 vs. 1.3 ± .1, p < .001). In up to 1/3 of the patients, 3D ECHO measurements would have predicted different (generally smaller) valve size than was the valve size implanted with favorable result. The concordance of the implanted valve size with the recommended size based on preprocedural MDCT and 3D ECHO AA area was 79.4% versus 61% (p = .001), and for the area-derived diameter, the concordance was 80.1% versus 61.7% (p = .001). 2D ECHO diameter concordance was similar to MDCT (78.7%). CONCLUSIONS: 3D ECHO AA measurements are smaller than MDCT measurements. If 3D ECHO-based parameters alone are used to size the Edwards Sapien balloon expandable valve, then the selected valve size would have been smaller than the valve size implanted with favorable result in 1/3 of the patients. MDCT preprocedural TAVR assessment should be the preferred method over 3D ECHO in routine clinical practice to determine Edwards Sapien valve size.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a transkatetrální implantace aortální chlopně $x metody $7 D065467
- 650 12
- $a aortální stenóza $x diagnostické zobrazování $x chirurgie $x etiologie $7 D001024
- 650 12
- $a srdeční chlopně umělé $7 D006350
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 _2
- $a echokardiografie $x metody $7 D004452
- 650 _2
- $a multidetektorová počítačová tomografie $x metody $7 D061330
- 650 _2
- $a aortální chlopeň $x diagnostické zobrazování $x chirurgie $7 D001021
- 650 _2
- $a protézy - design $7 D011474
- 650 _2
- $a echokardiografie transezofageální $x metody $7 D017548
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Bis, Josef $u Department of Cardioangiology, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Polansky, Pavel $u Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Kvasnicka, Tomas $u Department of Radiology, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Borg, Alex $u Department of Cardiology, Mater Dei Hospital, Triq Dun Karm, L-Imsida MSD 2090 and University of Malta, Msida MSD, Malta
- 700 1_
- $a Dusek, Jaroslav $u Department of Cardioangiology, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Brtko, Miroslav $u Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Tuna, Martin $u Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Praus, Rudolf $u Department of Cardioangiology, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Ballon, Marek $u Department of Cardioangiology, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Stasek, Josef $u Department of Cardioangiology, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Littnerova, Simona $u Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Parizek, Petr $u Department of Cardioangiology, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic $u Faculty of Medicine Hradec Kralove, Charles University Prague, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001491 $t Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) $x 1540-8175 $g Roč. 40, č. 8 (2023), s. 784-791
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37417924 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20231013 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20231026105628 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2000281 $s 1203031
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2023 $b 40 $c 8 $d 784-791 $e 20230707 $i 1540-8175 $m Echocardiography $n Echocardiography $x MED00001491
- GRA __
- $p Charles University, Czech Republic
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20231013