• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Consistency checks to improve measurement with the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)

J. Rabinowitz, RC. Young, C. Yavorsky, JBW. Williams, J. Sedway, P. Marino, C. Matteo, A. Mahableshwarkar, A. Kott, N. Hefting, J. Engler, C. Brady

. 2024 ; 345 (-) : 24-31. [pub] 20231020

Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc24000090

BACKGROUND: Mitigating rating inconsistency can improve measurement fidelity and detection of treatment response. METHODS: The International Society for CNS Clinical Trials and Methodology convened an expert Working Group that developed logical consistency (LC) checks for ratings of the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), which is widely used in studies of mood and bipolar disorders. LC and statistical outlier-response pattern checks (SC) were applied to 63,228 YMRS administrations from 14 clinical trials evaluating treatments for bipolar disorder. Checks were also applied to Monte Carlo-simulated data as a proxy for their use under conditions of inconsistency. RESULTS: 42 LC flags were developed, and four SC flags were created from the data set (n = 14). Almost 20 % of the rating administrations had at least one LC flag, 6.7 % had two or more, 1.7 % had three or more; 17.3 % percent of the administrations had at least one SC flag and 4.6 % percent had two or more. Overall, 31 % of administrations had at least one flag of any type, 12.1 % had two or more and 5.3 % had three or more. In acute antimanic treatment trials (n = 10) there were more flags of any type compared to relapse prevention trials (n = 4). LIMITATIONS: Flagged ratings may represent less-common presentations assessed correctly. CONCLUSIONS: Using established methods, we illustrate development and application of consistency flags for YMRS ratings. Applying flags and mitigation during trials may improve the value of YMRS data, help focus attention on rater training, and improve reliability and validity of trial data.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24000090
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240213092946.0
007      
ta
008      
240109e20231020ne f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.jad.2023.10.098 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)37865349
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ne
100    1_
$a Rabinowitz, Jonathan $u Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel. Electronic address: jonathan.rabinowitz@biu.ac.il
245    10
$a Consistency checks to improve measurement with the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) / $c J. Rabinowitz, RC. Young, C. Yavorsky, JBW. Williams, J. Sedway, P. Marino, C. Matteo, A. Mahableshwarkar, A. Kott, N. Hefting, J. Engler, C. Brady
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Mitigating rating inconsistency can improve measurement fidelity and detection of treatment response. METHODS: The International Society for CNS Clinical Trials and Methodology convened an expert Working Group that developed logical consistency (LC) checks for ratings of the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), which is widely used in studies of mood and bipolar disorders. LC and statistical outlier-response pattern checks (SC) were applied to 63,228 YMRS administrations from 14 clinical trials evaluating treatments for bipolar disorder. Checks were also applied to Monte Carlo-simulated data as a proxy for their use under conditions of inconsistency. RESULTS: 42 LC flags were developed, and four SC flags were created from the data set (n = 14). Almost 20 % of the rating administrations had at least one LC flag, 6.7 % had two or more, 1.7 % had three or more; 17.3 % percent of the administrations had at least one SC flag and 4.6 % percent had two or more. Overall, 31 % of administrations had at least one flag of any type, 12.1 % had two or more and 5.3 % had three or more. In acute antimanic treatment trials (n = 10) there were more flags of any type compared to relapse prevention trials (n = 4). LIMITATIONS: Flagged ratings may represent less-common presentations assessed correctly. CONCLUSIONS: Using established methods, we illustrate development and application of consistency flags for YMRS ratings. Applying flags and mitigation during trials may improve the value of YMRS data, help focus attention on rater training, and improve reliability and validity of trial data.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
650    12
$a mánie $x farmakoterapie $7 D000087122
650    12
$a bipolární porucha $x diagnóza $x farmakoterapie $7 D001714
650    _2
$a antimanika $x terapeutické užití $7 D018692
650    _2
$a afekt $7 D000339
650    _2
$a psychiatrické posuzovací škály $7 D011569
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Young, Robert C $u Dept. of Psychiatry, Weil Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA
700    1_
$a Yavorsky, Christian $u Valis Bioscience, Berkeley, CA, USA
700    1_
$a Williams, Janet B W $u Columbia University Department of Psychiatry, c/o 2466 Westlake Ave N., #19, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
700    1_
$a Sedway, Jan $u WCG Clinical Endpoint Solutions, 5000 Centregreen Way, Suite 200, Cary, NC 27513, USA
700    1_
$a Marino, Patricia $u Weill Cornell Medical College, 21 Bloomingdale Road, White Plains, NY 10605, USA
700    1_
$a Matteo, Christopher $u TPS Global, 1777 Sentry Parkway West, Suite 100, Building 17, Blue Bell, PA 19422, USA
700    1_
$a Mahableshwarkar, Atul $u ARM Pharma Consulting, 3 Chicory Lane, Riverwoods, IL 60015, USA
700    1_
$a Kott, Alan $u Signant Health, Slezská 2127/13, 120 00 Prague 2, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Hefting, Nanco $u H. Lundbeck A/S, Ottiliavej 9, 2500 Valby, Denmark
700    1_
$a Engler, Jenicka $u Cronos Clinical Consulting Services, Inc., an IQVIA business, 201 S Main St, Lambertville, NJ 08530, USA
700    1_
$a Brady, Chris $u WCG Clinical Endpoint Solutions, 5000 Centregreen Way, Suite 200, Cary, NC 27513, USA
773    0_
$w MED00002501 $t Journal of affective disorders $x 1573-2517 $g Roč. 345 (20231020), s. 24-31
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37865349 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20240109 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240213092944 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2049030 $s 1209784
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 345 $c - $d 24-31 $e 20231020 $i 1573-2517 $m Journal of affective disorders $n J Affect Disord $x MED00002501
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20240109

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace