-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Increased cardiovascular mortality in patients with mechanically expandable transcatheter aortic valve and without permanent pacemaker
P. Hájek, M. Horvath, E. Hansvenclova, M. Pecková, R. Adlova
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu pozorovací studie, časopisecké články
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2013
Free Medical Journals
od 2014
Freely Accessible Journals
od 2014
PubMed Central
od 2014
Europe PubMed Central
od 2014
ProQuest Central
od 2014-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2013-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2014-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2014-01-01
- MeSH
- aortální chlopeň diagnostické zobrazování chirurgie MeSH
- aortální stenóza * diagnostické zobrazování chirurgie MeSH
- kardiostimulátor * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- rizikové faktory MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- pozorovací studie MeSH
INTRODUCTION: Use of the mechanically expandable transcatheter aortic valve (MEV) has been recently linked to increased risks of valve dysfunction and cardiovascular mortality. The risk of developing conduction disturbance with the MEV valve is well known, and the negative prognostic impact of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation is another consideration. AIM: This study aimed to compare the mid-term survival of patients with MEV and self-expandable valves (SEV), and to examine survival of both groups according to the presence or absence of PPI. METHODS: This single-centre, retrospective, observational study examined data from MEV and SEV groups comprising 92 and 373 patients, respectively. The mean clinical follow-up was 2.5±1.7 years. Mortality information was obtained from the National Institutes of Health Information and Statistics. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. The log-rank test showed higher cardiovascular mortality in the MEV group (p=0.042; the relative risk (RR) 1.594 (95% CI 1.013 to 2.508)). The Cox proportional hazards model identified MEV implantation as an independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality. The rate of PPI was twice as high in the MEV vs SEV group (33.7% vs 16.1%; p<0.001). We compared the survival of both groups according to the presence or absence of PPI and found higher mortality in the MEV group without PPI versus the SEV group without PPI (p=0.007; RR 2.156 (95% CI 1.213 to 3.831)). Survival did not differ in the groups with PPI. CONCLUSIONS: A higher mid-term cardiovascular mortality rate was observed with MEV versus SEV implants. Comparing both groups according to the presence or absence of PPI, we observed a higher mortality risk in patients with MEV without PPI than in SEV without PPI. In contrast, mortality did not differ between the groups when PPI was implanted.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24000241
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240213093030.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240109s2023 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1136/openhrt-2023-002386 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)38097364
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Hájek, Petr $u Department of Cardiology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic petr.hajek@fnmotol.cz $1 https://orcid.org/0000000300151071
- 245 10
- $a Increased cardiovascular mortality in patients with mechanically expandable transcatheter aortic valve and without permanent pacemaker / $c P. Hájek, M. Horvath, E. Hansvenclova, M. Pecková, R. Adlova
- 520 9_
- $a INTRODUCTION: Use of the mechanically expandable transcatheter aortic valve (MEV) has been recently linked to increased risks of valve dysfunction and cardiovascular mortality. The risk of developing conduction disturbance with the MEV valve is well known, and the negative prognostic impact of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation is another consideration. AIM: This study aimed to compare the mid-term survival of patients with MEV and self-expandable valves (SEV), and to examine survival of both groups according to the presence or absence of PPI. METHODS: This single-centre, retrospective, observational study examined data from MEV and SEV groups comprising 92 and 373 patients, respectively. The mean clinical follow-up was 2.5±1.7 years. Mortality information was obtained from the National Institutes of Health Information and Statistics. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. The log-rank test showed higher cardiovascular mortality in the MEV group (p=0.042; the relative risk (RR) 1.594 (95% CI 1.013 to 2.508)). The Cox proportional hazards model identified MEV implantation as an independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality. The rate of PPI was twice as high in the MEV vs SEV group (33.7% vs 16.1%; p<0.001). We compared the survival of both groups according to the presence or absence of PPI and found higher mortality in the MEV group without PPI versus the SEV group without PPI (p=0.007; RR 2.156 (95% CI 1.213 to 3.831)). Survival did not differ in the groups with PPI. CONCLUSIONS: A higher mid-term cardiovascular mortality rate was observed with MEV versus SEV implants. Comparing both groups according to the presence or absence of PPI, we observed a higher mortality risk in patients with MEV without PPI than in SEV without PPI. In contrast, mortality did not differ between the groups when PPI was implanted.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a aortální chlopeň $x diagnostické zobrazování $x chirurgie $7 D001021
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 12
- $a aortální stenóza $x diagnostické zobrazování $x chirurgie $7 D001024
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
- 650 12
- $a kardiostimulátor $7 D010138
- 655 _2
- $a pozorovací studie $7 D064888
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Horvath, Martin $u Department of Cardiology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Hansvenclova, Eva $u Department of Cardiology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Pecková, Monika $u Institute of Applied Mathematics and Information Technologies, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Adlova, Radka $u Department of Cardiology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00186378 $t Open heart $x 2053-3624 $g Roč. 10, č. 2 (2023)
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38097364 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240109 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240213093028 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2049114 $s 1209935
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2023 $b 10 $c 2 $e 20231214 $i 2053-3624 $m Open heart $n Open Heart $x MED00186378
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240109