-
Something wrong with this record ?
The effect of biological maturation on foot morphology, and their relation to postural stability performance in male footballers
F. Fallon Verbruggen, M. Kaľata, J. Marenčáková, T. Malý, F. Zahálka
Language English Country Italy
Document type Journal Article
- MeSH
- Lower Extremity * MeSH
- Ankle Joint MeSH
- Ankle MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Postural Balance * MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
BACKGROUND: Biological maturity (BM) and foot morphology (FM) can independently alter neuromuscular loading on the ankle-foot complex, potentially causing stability deficits and injury predisposition. However, the influence of BM on FM, and how much both explain neuromuscular performance in postural stability (PS) tests, has been understudied. This study aimed to investigate the effect of BM on FM, and then discover to what extent both factors explain the variance in PS performance in adolescent footballers. METHODS: Over one season, 399 three-dimensional foot scans were gathered from 72 footballers (U12-U15). PS was measured by center of pressure (COP) displacement in bilateral and unilateral stance. The Khamis and Roche equation determined maturity status (MS), while formulae from Mirwald and Khamis and Roche estimated timing of biological maturation (TBM). Principal component analysis determined nine principal components that explained the most variance in FM. An ANCOVA determined the effect of TBM on FM principal components, with covariates of age, height, weight, playing position, and foot preference. Step-wise linear regression determined the explanation of COP displacement by the above-mentioned predictors. RESULTS: There was significantly increased foot pronation during and after peak height velocity/puberty. MS and four foot principal components (foot arch and width, great toe width and length) were significant predictors in all PS tests (R2: 0.105-0.180). CONCLUSIONS: TBM had a significant effect on FM presentation, and should be a part of adolescent foot assessment. While they only explained a small amount of variance, determining MS and FM may identify those requiring additional PS attention.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24000894
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240213093441.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240109s2023 it f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.23736/S0022-4707.23.15037-7 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)37535341
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a it
- 100 1_
- $a Fallon Verbruggen, Ferdia $u Sport Research Center, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic - ferdiafv@gmail.com
- 245 14
- $a The effect of biological maturation on foot morphology, and their relation to postural stability performance in male footballers / $c F. Fallon Verbruggen, M. Kaľata, J. Marenčáková, T. Malý, F. Zahálka
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Biological maturity (BM) and foot morphology (FM) can independently alter neuromuscular loading on the ankle-foot complex, potentially causing stability deficits and injury predisposition. However, the influence of BM on FM, and how much both explain neuromuscular performance in postural stability (PS) tests, has been understudied. This study aimed to investigate the effect of BM on FM, and then discover to what extent both factors explain the variance in PS performance in adolescent footballers. METHODS: Over one season, 399 three-dimensional foot scans were gathered from 72 footballers (U12-U15). PS was measured by center of pressure (COP) displacement in bilateral and unilateral stance. The Khamis and Roche equation determined maturity status (MS), while formulae from Mirwald and Khamis and Roche estimated timing of biological maturation (TBM). Principal component analysis determined nine principal components that explained the most variance in FM. An ANCOVA determined the effect of TBM on FM principal components, with covariates of age, height, weight, playing position, and foot preference. Step-wise linear regression determined the explanation of COP displacement by the above-mentioned predictors. RESULTS: There was significantly increased foot pronation during and after peak height velocity/puberty. MS and four foot principal components (foot arch and width, great toe width and length) were significant predictors in all PS tests (R2: 0.105-0.180). CONCLUSIONS: TBM had a significant effect on FM presentation, and should be a part of adolescent foot assessment. While they only explained a small amount of variance, determining MS and FM may identify those requiring additional PS attention.
- 650 _2
- $a mladiství $7 D000293
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 12
- $a posturální rovnováha $7 D004856
- 650 12
- $a dolní končetina $7 D035002
- 650 _2
- $a kotník $7 D000842
- 650 _2
- $a hlezenní kloub $7 D000843
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Kaľata, Maroš $u Sport Research Center, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Marenčáková, Jitka $u Sport Research Center, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Malý, Tomáš $u Sport Research Center, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Zahálka, František $u Sport Research Center, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002948 $t Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness $x 1827-1928 $g Roč. 63, č. 11 (2023), s. 1155-1164
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37535341 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240109 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240213093438 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2049484 $s 1210588
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2023 $b 63 $c 11 $d 1155-1164 $e 20230803 $i 1827-1928 $m Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness $n J Sports Med Phys Fitness $x MED00002948
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240109