-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Link between both infratentorial and supratentorial intracranial pressure burdens and final outcome in patients with infratentorial brain injury
O. Petr, WM. Ho, T. Petutschnigg, A. Krigers, SA. Treichl, C. Preuss-Hernández, K. Brawanski, R. Helbok, C. Thomé
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
37119097
DOI
10.3171/2023.1.jns221806
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- Glasgowská stupnice následků MeSH
- intrakraniální hypertenze * etiologie terapie MeSH
- intrakraniální tlak MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- monitorování fyziologických funkcí MeSH
- mozeček MeSH
- mozek MeSH
- poranění mozku * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
OBJECTIVE: Increased intracranial pressure (ICP) is most likely not being transmitted uniformly within the cranium. The ICP profiles in the supra- and infratentorial compartments remain largely unclear. Increased ICP in the cerebellum, however, is insufficiently captured by supratentorial ICP (ICPsup) monitoring due to compartmentalization through the tentorium. The authors hypothesized that additional infratentorial ICP (ICPinf) monitoring can be clinically valuable in selected patients. The aims of this study were to demonstrate the safety and feasibility of ICPinf monitoring and to investigate the influence of the ICPinf on clinical outcome in a real-world setting. METHODS: Fifteen consecutive patients with posterior fossa (PF) lesions requiring surgery and anticipated prolonged neurointensive care between June 2019 and December 2021 were included. Simultaneous ICPsup and ICPinf were recorded. ICP burden was defined as a 15-minute interval with a mean ICP > 22 mm Hg. The Glasgow Outcome Scale score was assessed after 3 months. RESULTS: The mean ICPinf was substantially higher compared with ICPsup throughout the entire period of ICP recording (16.08 ± 4.44 vs 10.74 ± 3.6 mm Hg, p < 0.01). ICPinf was significantly higher in patients with unfavorable outcome when compared with those with favorable outcome (mean 17.2 ± 4.1 vs 11.4 ± 3.5 mm Hg, p < 0.05). Patients with unfavorable outcome showed significantly higher ICPinf burden compared with those with favorable outcome (mean 40.6 ± 43.8 vs 0.3 ± 0.4 hours, p < 0.05). Neither absolute ICPsup nor ICPsup burden was significantly associated with unfavorable outcome (p = 0.13). No monitoring-associated complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Supplementary ICPinf monitoring is safe and reliable. There is a significant transtentorial pressure gradient within the cranium showing elevated ICPs in the PF. Elevated ICP levels in the PF were strongly associated with unfavorable neurological outcome irrespective of ICPsup values.
Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Department of Neurology Johannes Kepler University Linz Austria
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24000930
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240213093509.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240109s2023 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3171/2023.1.JNS221806 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)37119097
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Petr, Ondra $u Departments of1Neurosurgery and $u 4Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Link between both infratentorial and supratentorial intracranial pressure burdens and final outcome in patients with infratentorial brain injury / $c O. Petr, WM. Ho, T. Petutschnigg, A. Krigers, SA. Treichl, C. Preuss-Hernández, K. Brawanski, R. Helbok, C. Thomé
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVE: Increased intracranial pressure (ICP) is most likely not being transmitted uniformly within the cranium. The ICP profiles in the supra- and infratentorial compartments remain largely unclear. Increased ICP in the cerebellum, however, is insufficiently captured by supratentorial ICP (ICPsup) monitoring due to compartmentalization through the tentorium. The authors hypothesized that additional infratentorial ICP (ICPinf) monitoring can be clinically valuable in selected patients. The aims of this study were to demonstrate the safety and feasibility of ICPinf monitoring and to investigate the influence of the ICPinf on clinical outcome in a real-world setting. METHODS: Fifteen consecutive patients with posterior fossa (PF) lesions requiring surgery and anticipated prolonged neurointensive care between June 2019 and December 2021 were included. Simultaneous ICPsup and ICPinf were recorded. ICP burden was defined as a 15-minute interval with a mean ICP > 22 mm Hg. The Glasgow Outcome Scale score was assessed after 3 months. RESULTS: The mean ICPinf was substantially higher compared with ICPsup throughout the entire period of ICP recording (16.08 ± 4.44 vs 10.74 ± 3.6 mm Hg, p < 0.01). ICPinf was significantly higher in patients with unfavorable outcome when compared with those with favorable outcome (mean 17.2 ± 4.1 vs 11.4 ± 3.5 mm Hg, p < 0.05). Patients with unfavorable outcome showed significantly higher ICPinf burden compared with those with favorable outcome (mean 40.6 ± 43.8 vs 0.3 ± 0.4 hours, p < 0.05). Neither absolute ICPsup nor ICPsup burden was significantly associated with unfavorable outcome (p = 0.13). No monitoring-associated complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Supplementary ICPinf monitoring is safe and reliable. There is a significant transtentorial pressure gradient within the cranium showing elevated ICPs in the PF. Elevated ICP levels in the PF were strongly associated with unfavorable neurological outcome irrespective of ICPsup values.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a intrakraniální tlak $7 D007427
- 650 _2
- $a mozek $7 D001921
- 650 12
- $a poranění mozku $7 D001930
- 650 _2
- $a mozeček $7 D002531
- 650 _2
- $a Glasgowská stupnice následků $7 D023261
- 650 12
- $a intrakraniální hypertenze $x etiologie $x terapie $7 D019586
- 650 _2
- $a monitorování fyziologických funkcí $7 D008991
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Ho, Wing Mann $u Departments of1Neurosurgery and
- 700 1_
- $a Petutschnigg, Thomas $u Departments of1Neurosurgery and
- 700 1_
- $a Krigers, Aleksandrs $u Departments of1Neurosurgery and
- 700 1_
- $a Treichl, Stephanie Alice $u Departments of1Neurosurgery and
- 700 1_
- $a Preuss-Hernández, Christian $u Departments of1Neurosurgery and $u 4Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Brawanski, Konstantin $u Departments of1Neurosurgery and
- 700 1_
- $a Helbok, Raimund $u 2Neurology, Medical University Innsbruck, Austria $u 3Department of Neurology, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria; and
- 700 1_
- $a Thomé, Claudius $u Departments of1Neurosurgery and
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002843 $t Journal of neurosurgery $x 1933-0693 $g Roč. 139, č. 5 (2023), s. 1430-1438
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37119097 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240109 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240213093506 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2049512 $s 1210624
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2023 $b 139 $c 5 $d 1430-1438 $e 20230428 $i 1933-0693 $m Journal of neurosurgery $n J Neurosurg $x MED00002843
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240109
