-
Something wrong with this record ?
Plain language summary of the CheckMate 76K study results: nivolumab given after stage 2B/2C melanoma is removed by surgery
JM. Kirkwood, MD. Vecchio, J. Weber, C. Hoeller, JJ. Grob, P. Mohr, C. Loquai, C. Dutriaux, V. Chiarion-Sileni, J. Mackiewicz, P. Rutkowski, P. Arenberger, G. Quereux, TM. Meniawy, PA. Ascierto, AM. Menzies, P. Durani, M. Lobo, F. Campigotto, B....
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Review
PubMed
38390818
DOI
10.2217/fon-2023-0977
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Ipilimumab therapeutic use MeSH
- Combined Modality Therapy MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Melanoma * pathology MeSH
- Skin Neoplasms * drug therapy surgery etiology MeSH
- Nivolumab MeSH
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Review MeSH
WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: In this article, we summarize results from the ongoing phase 3 CheckMate 76K clinical study published online in Nature Medicine in October 2023. The study goal was to learn whether nivolumab works as an adjuvant therapy (that is, helps to keep cancer from coming back when it is given after surgery) for stage 2 melanoma (skin cancer) that has not spread to other parts of the body. Nivolumab is an immunotherapy that activates a person's immune system so it can destroy cancer cells. In melanoma, staging describes the severity of the cancer. Melanoma staging ranges from 0 (very thin and confined to the upper layer of the skin) to 4 (spread to distant parts of the body), with earlier stages removed by surgery. The people in this study had stage 2 melanoma that had not spread to the lymph nodes or other organs in the body. HOW WAS THE STUDY DESIGNED?: People 12 years and older with stage 2 melanoma that had not spread and had been removed by surgery were included in CheckMate 76K. People were randomly assigned to receive either nivolumab (526 patients) or placebo (264 patients). A placebo resembles the test medicine but does not contain any active medicines. The researchers assessed whether people who received nivolumab lived longer without their cancer returning and/or spreading to other parts of their bodies (compared with placebo) and if nivolumab was well tolerated. WHAT WERE THE RESULTS?: Researchers found that people who received nivolumab were 58% less likely to have their cancer return and 53% less likely of having their cancer spread to distant parts of their body, compared with placebo. These reductions in risk with nivolumab were seen in different subgroups of people with a range of characteristics, and regardless of how deep the melanoma had gone into the skin. People taking nivolumab had more side effects than those taking placebo, but most were mild to moderate and manageable. WHAT DO THE RESULTS MEAN?: Results from CheckMate 76K support the benefit of using nivolumab as a treatment option for people with stage 2 melanoma post-surgery.
Bristol Myers Squibb Princeton NJ USA
Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OH USA
Elbe Kliniken Buxtehude Buxtehude Germany
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori Milan Italy
Hôpital de la Timone Marseille France
Hôpital Saint André Bordeaux France
Institute of Oncology Poznan University of Medical Sciences Poznan Poland
Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G Pascale Naples Italy
Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS Padova Italy
Maria Skłodowska Curie National Research Institute of Oncology Warsaw Poland
Medizinische Universität Wien Vienna Austria
Nantes University Hospital Nantes France
NYU Langone Medical Center New York NY USA
University of Mainz Medical Center Mainz Germany
University of Western Australia and Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital Perth WA Australia
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24006490
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240423155320.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240412s2024 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.2217/fon-2023-0977 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)38390818
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Kirkwood, John M $u UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- 245 10
- $a Plain language summary of the CheckMate 76K study results: nivolumab given after stage 2B/2C melanoma is removed by surgery / $c JM. Kirkwood, MD. Vecchio, J. Weber, C. Hoeller, JJ. Grob, P. Mohr, C. Loquai, C. Dutriaux, V. Chiarion-Sileni, J. Mackiewicz, P. Rutkowski, P. Arenberger, G. Quereux, TM. Meniawy, PA. Ascierto, AM. Menzies, P. Durani, M. Lobo, F. Campigotto, B. Gastman, GV. Long
- 520 9_
- $a WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: In this article, we summarize results from the ongoing phase 3 CheckMate 76K clinical study published online in Nature Medicine in October 2023. The study goal was to learn whether nivolumab works as an adjuvant therapy (that is, helps to keep cancer from coming back when it is given after surgery) for stage 2 melanoma (skin cancer) that has not spread to other parts of the body. Nivolumab is an immunotherapy that activates a person's immune system so it can destroy cancer cells. In melanoma, staging describes the severity of the cancer. Melanoma staging ranges from 0 (very thin and confined to the upper layer of the skin) to 4 (spread to distant parts of the body), with earlier stages removed by surgery. The people in this study had stage 2 melanoma that had not spread to the lymph nodes or other organs in the body. HOW WAS THE STUDY DESIGNED?: People 12 years and older with stage 2 melanoma that had not spread and had been removed by surgery were included in CheckMate 76K. People were randomly assigned to receive either nivolumab (526 patients) or placebo (264 patients). A placebo resembles the test medicine but does not contain any active medicines. The researchers assessed whether people who received nivolumab lived longer without their cancer returning and/or spreading to other parts of their bodies (compared with placebo) and if nivolumab was well tolerated. WHAT WERE THE RESULTS?: Researchers found that people who received nivolumab were 58% less likely to have their cancer return and 53% less likely of having their cancer spread to distant parts of their body, compared with placebo. These reductions in risk with nivolumab were seen in different subgroups of people with a range of characteristics, and regardless of how deep the melanoma had gone into the skin. People taking nivolumab had more side effects than those taking placebo, but most were mild to moderate and manageable. WHAT DO THE RESULTS MEAN?: Results from CheckMate 76K support the benefit of using nivolumab as a treatment option for people with stage 2 melanoma post-surgery.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a melanom $x patologie $7 D008545
- 650 _2
- $a nivolumab $7 D000077594
- 650 _2
- $a ipilimumab $x terapeutické užití $7 D000074324
- 650 12
- $a nádory kůže $x farmakoterapie $x chirurgie $x etiologie $7 D012878
- 650 _2
- $a kombinovaná terapie $7 D003131
- 650 _2
- $a protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie $x terapeutické užití $7 D000971
- 650 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma $7 D016032
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Vecchio, Michele Del $u Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Weber, Jeffrey $u NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Hoeller, Christoph $u Medizinische Universität Wien, Vienna, Austria
- 700 1_
- $a Grob, Jean-Jacques $u Hôpital de la Timone, Marseille, France
- 700 1_
- $a Mohr, Peter $u Elbe Kliniken Buxtehude, Buxtehude, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Loquai, Carmen $u University of Mainz Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Dutriaux, Caroline $u Hôpital Saint André, Bordeaux, France
- 700 1_
- $a Chiarion-Sileni, Vanna $u Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Mackiewicz, Jacek $u Institute of Oncology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
- 700 1_
- $a Rutkowski, Piotr $u Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
- 700 1_
- $a Arenberger, Petr $u Charles University Third Faculty of Medicine & University Hospital of Královské Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Quereux, Gaelle $u Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France
- 700 1_
- $a Meniawy, Tarek M $u University of Western Australia & Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia
- 700 1_
- $a Ascierto, Paolo A $u Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Naples, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Menzies, Alexander M $u Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, & Royal North Shore & Mater Hospitals, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- 700 1_
- $a Durani, Piyush $u Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Lobo, Maurice $u Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Campigotto, Federico $u Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Gastman, Brian $u Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Long, Georgina V $u Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, & Royal North Shore & Mater Hospitals, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- 773 0_
- $w MED00008687 $t Future oncology $x 1744-8301 $g Roč. 20, č. 15 (2024), s. 959-968
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38390818 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240412 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240423155317 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2080842 $s 1216257
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 20 $c 15 $d 959-968 $e 20240223 $i 1744-8301 $m Future oncology $n Future Oncol $x MED00008687
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240412