Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Validation of SPARCC MRI-RETIC e-tools for increasing scoring proficiency of MRI sacroiliac joint lesions in axial spondyloarth

W. Maksymowych, AEFEF. Hadsbjerg, M. Østergaard, R. Micheroli, SJ. Pedersen, A. Ciurea, N. Vladimirova, MS. Nissen, K. Bubova, S. Wichuk, M. de Hooge, AJ. Mathew, K. Pintaric, M. Gregová, Z. Snoj, M. Wetterslev, K. Gorican, B. Möller, I. Eshed,...

. 2024 ; 10 (1) : . [pub] 20240213

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial

Persistent link   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc24007146

BACKGROUND: The Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) developers have created web-based calibration modules for the SPARCC MRI sacroiliac joint (SIJ) scoring methods. We aimed to test the impact of applying these e-modules on the feasibility and reliability of these methods. METHODS: The SPARCC-SIJ RETIC e-modules contain cases with baseline and follow-up scans and an online scoring interface. Visual real-time feedback regarding concordance/discordance of scoring with expert readers is provided by a colour-coding scheme. Reliability is assessed in real time by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), cases being scored until ICC targets are attained. Participating readers (n=17) from the EuroSpA Imaging project were randomised to one of two reader calibration strategies that each comprised three stages. Baseline and follow-up scans from 25 cases were scored after each stage was completed. Reliability was compared with a SPARCC developer, and the System Usability Scale (SUS) assessed feasibility. RESULTS: The reliability of readers for scoring bone marrow oedema was high after the first stage of calibration, and only minor improvement was noted following the use of the inflammation module. Greater enhancement of reader reliability was evident after the use of the structural module and was most consistently evident for the scoring of erosion (ICC status/change: stage 1 (0.42/0.20) to stage 3 (0.50/0.38)) and backfill (ICC status/change: stage 1 (0.51/0.19) to stage 3 (0.69/0.41)). The feasibility of both e-modules was evident by high SUS scores. CONCLUSION: The SPARCC-SIJ RETIC e-modules are feasible, effective knowledge transfer tools, and their use is recommended before using the SPARCC methods for clinical research and tria.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24007146
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240423155740.0
007      
ta
008      
240412s2024 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003923 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)38351052
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Maksymowych, Walter $u Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada WALTER.MAKSYMOWYCH@UALBERTA.CA $u CARE ARTHRITIS Limited, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada $1 https://orcid.org/0000000212911755
245    10
$a Validation of SPARCC MRI-RETIC e-tools for increasing scoring proficiency of MRI sacroiliac joint lesions in axial spondyloarth / $c W. Maksymowych, AEFEF. Hadsbjerg, M. Østergaard, R. Micheroli, SJ. Pedersen, A. Ciurea, N. Vladimirova, MS. Nissen, K. Bubova, S. Wichuk, M. de Hooge, AJ. Mathew, K. Pintaric, M. Gregová, Z. Snoj, M. Wetterslev, K. Gorican, B. Möller, I. Eshed, J. Paschke, RG. Lambert
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: The Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) developers have created web-based calibration modules for the SPARCC MRI sacroiliac joint (SIJ) scoring methods. We aimed to test the impact of applying these e-modules on the feasibility and reliability of these methods. METHODS: The SPARCC-SIJ RETIC e-modules contain cases with baseline and follow-up scans and an online scoring interface. Visual real-time feedback regarding concordance/discordance of scoring with expert readers is provided by a colour-coding scheme. Reliability is assessed in real time by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), cases being scored until ICC targets are attained. Participating readers (n=17) from the EuroSpA Imaging project were randomised to one of two reader calibration strategies that each comprised three stages. Baseline and follow-up scans from 25 cases were scored after each stage was completed. Reliability was compared with a SPARCC developer, and the System Usability Scale (SUS) assessed feasibility. RESULTS: The reliability of readers for scoring bone marrow oedema was high after the first stage of calibration, and only minor improvement was noted following the use of the inflammation module. Greater enhancement of reader reliability was evident after the use of the structural module and was most consistently evident for the scoring of erosion (ICC status/change: stage 1 (0.42/0.20) to stage 3 (0.50/0.38)) and backfill (ICC status/change: stage 1 (0.51/0.19) to stage 3 (0.69/0.41)). The feasibility of both e-modules was evident by high SUS scores. CONCLUSION: The SPARCC-SIJ RETIC e-modules are feasible, effective knowledge transfer tools, and their use is recommended before using the SPARCC methods for clinical research and tria.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $x metody $7 D008279
650    _2
$a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
650    12
$a sakroiliakální kloub $x diagnostické zobrazování $x patologie $7 D012446
650    12
$a spondylartritida $x diagnóza $x patologie $7 D025241
651    _2
$a Kanada $7 D002170
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
700    1_
$a Hadsbjerg, Anna Enevold Fløistrup E F $u Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark $u Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark $1 https://orcid.org/0000000181964327
700    1_
$a Østergaard, Mikkel $u Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark $u Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
700    1_
$a Micheroli, Raphael $u Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland $1 https://orcid.org/0000000289187304
700    1_
$a Pedersen, Susanne Juhl $u Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark $u Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark $1 https://orcid.org/0000000265009263
700    1_
$a Ciurea, Adrian $u Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland $1 https://orcid.org/0000000278707132
700    1_
$a Vladimirova, Nora $u Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark $u Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
700    1_
$a Nissen, Michael S $u Rheumatology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland $1 https://orcid.org/0000000263261764
700    1_
$a Bubova, Kristyna $u First Faculty of Medicine, Rheumatology, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Wichuk, Stephanie $u Rheumatology, University of Alberta Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
700    1_
$a de Hooge, Manouk $u Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium $u Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands $1 https://orcid.org/0000000206529808
700    1_
$a Mathew, Ashish J $u Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark $u Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Christian Medical College and Hospital Vellore, Vellore, India $1 https://orcid.org/0000000220612042
700    1_
$a Pintaric, Karlo $u Radiology, UKC Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
700    1_
$a Gregová, Monika $u First Faculty of Medicine, Rheumatology, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Snoj, Ziga $u Radiology, UKC Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
700    1_
$a Wetterslev, Marie $u Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark $u Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark $1 https://orcid.org/0000000220959441
700    1_
$a Gorican, Karel $u Radiology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Möller, Burkhard $u Rheumatology, Inselspital Universitatsspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Eshed, Iris $u Diagnostic Imaging, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel $u Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel $1 https://orcid.org/0000000246559606
700    1_
$a Paschke, Joel $u CARE Arthritis, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
700    1_
$a Lambert, Robert Gw $u Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
773    0_
$w MED00188812 $t RMD open $x 2056-5933 $g Roč. 10, č. 1 (2024)
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38351052 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20240412 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240423155737 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2081249 $s 1216913
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 10 $c 1 $e 20240213 $i 2056-5933 $m RMD open $n RMD Open $x MED00188812
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20240412

Find record

Citation metrics

Archiving options