• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Hope and illness expectations: A cross-sectional study in patients with advanced cancer

M. Loučka, AD. Althouse, RM. Arnold, TJ. Smith, KJ. Smith, DB. White, MQ. Rosenzweig, Y. Schenker

. 2024 ; 38 (1) : 131-139. [pub] 20231212

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc24007745

BACKGROUND: The fear of taking away hope hinders clinicians' willingness to share serious news with patients with advanced disease. Unrealistic illness expectations, on the other hand, can complicate decision making and end-of-life care outcomes. Exploration of the association between hope and illness expectations can support clinicians in better communication with their patients. AIM: The aim of this study was to explore whether realistic illness expectations are associated with reduced hope in people with advanced cancer. DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional secondary analysis of baseline data from a primary palliative care cluster-randomized trial CONNECT (data collected from July 2016 to October 2020). Hope was measured by Herth Hope Index. Illness expectations were measured by assessing patients' understanding of their treatment goals, life expectancy, and terminal illness acknowledgement. Multivariable regression was performed, adjusting for demographical and clinical confounders. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients with advanced solid cancers recruited across 17 oncology clinics. RESULTS: Data from 672 patients were included in the study, with mean age of 69.3 years (±10.2), 53.6% were female. Proportion of patients indicating realistic expectations varied based on which question was asked from 10% to 46%. Median level of hope was 39 (IQR = 36-43). Multivariate non-inferiority regression did not find any significant differences in hope between patients with more and less realistic illness expectations. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that hope can be sustained while holding both realistic and unrealistic illness expectations. Communication about serious news should focus on clarifying the expectations as well as supporting people's hopes.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24007745
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240423160226.0
007      
ta
008      
240412s2024 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1177/02692163231214422 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)38087831
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Loučka, Martin $u Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $u Center for Palliative Care, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000298757997 $7 mzk2016899455
245    10
$a Hope and illness expectations: A cross-sectional study in patients with advanced cancer / $c M. Loučka, AD. Althouse, RM. Arnold, TJ. Smith, KJ. Smith, DB. White, MQ. Rosenzweig, Y. Schenker
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: The fear of taking away hope hinders clinicians' willingness to share serious news with patients with advanced disease. Unrealistic illness expectations, on the other hand, can complicate decision making and end-of-life care outcomes. Exploration of the association between hope and illness expectations can support clinicians in better communication with their patients. AIM: The aim of this study was to explore whether realistic illness expectations are associated with reduced hope in people with advanced cancer. DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional secondary analysis of baseline data from a primary palliative care cluster-randomized trial CONNECT (data collected from July 2016 to October 2020). Hope was measured by Herth Hope Index. Illness expectations were measured by assessing patients' understanding of their treatment goals, life expectancy, and terminal illness acknowledgement. Multivariable regression was performed, adjusting for demographical and clinical confounders. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients with advanced solid cancers recruited across 17 oncology clinics. RESULTS: Data from 672 patients were included in the study, with mean age of 69.3 years (±10.2), 53.6% were female. Proportion of patients indicating realistic expectations varied based on which question was asked from 10% to 46%. Median level of hope was 39 (IQR = 36-43). Multivariate non-inferiority regression did not find any significant differences in hope between patients with more and less realistic illness expectations. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that hope can be sustained while holding both realistic and unrealistic illness expectations. Communication about serious news should focus on clarifying the expectations as well as supporting people's hopes.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a průřezové studie $7 D003430
650    _2
$a naděje $7 D065026
650    _2
$a motivace $7 D009042
650    12
$a nádory $x terapie $7 D009369
650    _2
$a paliativní péče $x metody $7 D010166
650    12
$a péče o umírající $7 D013727
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma $7 D016032
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Althouse, Andrew D $u Department of Medicine, Center for Research on Health Care Data Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
700    1_
$a Arnold, Robert M $u Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA $u Palliative Research Center, University of Pittsburgh and Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
700    1_
$a Smith, Thomas J $u Division of General Internal Medicine, Section of Palliative Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
700    1_
$a Smith, Kenneth J $u Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
700    1_
$a White, Douglas B $u Palliative Research Center, University of Pittsburgh and Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA $u Program on Ethics and Decision Making in Critical Illness, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
700    1_
$a Rosenzweig, Margaret Q $u Palliative Research Center, University of Pittsburgh and Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA $u School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
700    1_
$a Schenker, Yael $u Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA $u Palliative Research Center, University of Pittsburgh and Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
773    0_
$w MED00006021 $t Palliative medicine $x 1477-030X $g Roč. 38, č. 1 (2024), s. 131-139
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38087831 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20240412 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240423160222 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2081620 $s 1217512
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 38 $c 1 $d 131-139 $e 20231212 $i 1477-030X $m Palliative medicine $n Palliat Med $x MED00006021
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20240412

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace