• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Coronary Artery Spasm During Pulsed Field vs Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of the Mitral Isthmus

C. Zhang, P. Neuzil, J. Petru, M. Funasako, P. Hala, K. Kopriva, JS. Koruth, SR. Dukkipati, VY. Reddy

. 2024 ; 9 (1) : 72-77. [pub] 20240101

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, komentáře

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc24007773

IMPORTANCE: In treating atrial fibrillation, pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel energy modality with comparable efficacy to conventional thermal ablation, such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA), but with the benefit of some preferentiality to myocardial tissue ablation. Studies have demonstrated important safety advantages, including the absence of esophageal injury or pulmonary vein stenosis and only rare phrenic nerve injury. However, there is emerging evidence of coronary artery vasospasm provoked by PFA. OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence and severity of left circumflex arterial vasospasm between PFA and RFA during adjacent ablation along the mitral isthmus. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective cohort study enrolled consecutive adult patients receiving first-ever PFA or RFA of the mitral isthmus during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in 2022 with acute follow-up at a single referral European center. EXPOSURE: A posterolateral mitral isthmus line was created using either a multielectrode pentaspline PFA catheter (endocardial ablation) or a saline-irrigated RFA catheter. Simultaneous diagnostic coronary angiography was performed before, during, and after catheter ablation. Nitroglycerin was planned for spasm persisting beyond 20 minutes or for significant electrocardiographic changes. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The frequency and severity of left circumflex arterial vasospasm was assessed and monitored, as were time to remission and any need for nitroglycerin administration. RESULTS: Of 26 included patients, 19 (73%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 65.5 (9.3) years. Patients underwent either PFA (n = 17) or RFA (n = 9) along the mitral isthmus. Coronary spasm was observed in 7 of 17 patients (41.2%) undergoing PFA: in 7 of 9 (77.8%) when the mitral isthmus ablation line was situated superiorly and in 0 of 8 when situated inferiorly. Conversely, coronary spasm did not occur in any of the 9 patients undergoing RFA. Of 5 patients in whom crossover PFA was performed after RFA failed to achieve conduction block, coronary spasm occurred in 3 (60%). Most instances of spasm (9 of 10 [90%]) were subclinical, with 2 (20%) requiring nitroglycerin administration. The median (range) time to resolution of spasm was 5 (5-25) minutes. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: When creating a mitral isthmus ablation line during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation, adjacent left circumflex arterial vasospasm frequently occurred with PFA and not RFA but was typically subclinical.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24007773
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240423160240.0
007      
ta
008      
240412s2024 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1001/jamacardio.2023.4405 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)38019505
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Zhang, Chi $u Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
245    10
$a Coronary Artery Spasm During Pulsed Field vs Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of the Mitral Isthmus / $c C. Zhang, P. Neuzil, J. Petru, M. Funasako, P. Hala, K. Kopriva, JS. Koruth, SR. Dukkipati, VY. Reddy
520    9_
$a IMPORTANCE: In treating atrial fibrillation, pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel energy modality with comparable efficacy to conventional thermal ablation, such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA), but with the benefit of some preferentiality to myocardial tissue ablation. Studies have demonstrated important safety advantages, including the absence of esophageal injury or pulmonary vein stenosis and only rare phrenic nerve injury. However, there is emerging evidence of coronary artery vasospasm provoked by PFA. OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence and severity of left circumflex arterial vasospasm between PFA and RFA during adjacent ablation along the mitral isthmus. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective cohort study enrolled consecutive adult patients receiving first-ever PFA or RFA of the mitral isthmus during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in 2022 with acute follow-up at a single referral European center. EXPOSURE: A posterolateral mitral isthmus line was created using either a multielectrode pentaspline PFA catheter (endocardial ablation) or a saline-irrigated RFA catheter. Simultaneous diagnostic coronary angiography was performed before, during, and after catheter ablation. Nitroglycerin was planned for spasm persisting beyond 20 minutes or for significant electrocardiographic changes. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The frequency and severity of left circumflex arterial vasospasm was assessed and monitored, as were time to remission and any need for nitroglycerin administration. RESULTS: Of 26 included patients, 19 (73%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 65.5 (9.3) years. Patients underwent either PFA (n = 17) or RFA (n = 9) along the mitral isthmus. Coronary spasm was observed in 7 of 17 patients (41.2%) undergoing PFA: in 7 of 9 (77.8%) when the mitral isthmus ablation line was situated superiorly and in 0 of 8 when situated inferiorly. Conversely, coronary spasm did not occur in any of the 9 patients undergoing RFA. Of 5 patients in whom crossover PFA was performed after RFA failed to achieve conduction block, coronary spasm occurred in 3 (60%). Most instances of spasm (9 of 10 [90%]) were subclinical, with 2 (20%) requiring nitroglycerin administration. The median (range) time to resolution of spasm was 5 (5-25) minutes. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: When creating a mitral isthmus ablation line during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation, adjacent left circumflex arterial vasospasm frequently occurred with PFA and not RFA but was typically subclinical.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    12
$a fibrilace síní $x chirurgie $x patofyziologie $7 D001281
650    12
$a koronární vazospasmus $x etiologie $7 D003329
650    _2
$a nitroglycerin $7 D005996
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    12
$a katetrizační ablace $x škodlivé účinky $7 D017115
650    _2
$a srdeční síně $x patofyziologie $7 D006325
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a komentáře $7 D016420
700    1_
$a Neuzil, Petr $u Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Petru, Jan $u Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Funasako, Moritoshi $u Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Hala, Pavel $u Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kopriva, Karel $u Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Koruth, Jacob S $u Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Dukkipati, Srinivas R $u Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
700    1_
$a Reddy, Vivek Y $u Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York $u Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00191356 $t JAMA cardiology $x 2380-6591 $g Roč. 9, č. 1 (2024), s. 72-77
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38019505 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20240412 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240423160236 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2081638 $s 1217540
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 9 $c 1 $d 72-77 $e 20240101 $i 2380-6591 $m JAMA cardiology $n JAMA Cardiol $x MED00191356
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20240412

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...