-
Something wrong with this record ?
Elective parotidectomy and neck dissection are not beneficial in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head
Z. Horakova, I. Starek, R. Salzman
Language English Country Brazil
Document type Journal Article
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2005
Free Medical Journals
from 2009
PubMed Central
from 2005
Open Access Digital Library
from 2005-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2009-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2009-06-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2009
- MeSH
- Neck Dissection methods MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Head and Neck Neoplasms * surgery pathology MeSH
- Skin Neoplasms * surgery pathology MeSH
- Parotid Neoplasms * surgery pathology MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Carcinoma, Squamous Cell * pathology MeSH
- Neoplasm Staging MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
OBJECTIVE: Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma (cSCC), a tumor with a significantly increasing incidence, is mostly diagnosed in the head region, where tumors have a worse prognosis and a higher risk of metastases. The presence of metastases reduces specific five-year survival from 99% to 50%. As the risk of occult metastases does not exceed 10%, elective dissection of the tributary parotid and neck lymph nodes is not recommended. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a group of 12 patients with cSCC of the head after elective dissections of regional (parotid and cervical) nodes by means of superficial parotidectomy and selective neck dissection. RESULTS: We diagnosed occult metastases neither in the cervical nor parotid nodes in any patient. None were diagnosed as a regional recurrence during the follow-up period. CONCLUCION: Our negative opinion on elective parotidectomy and neck dissection in cSCC of the head is in agreement with the majority of published studies. These elective procedures are not indicated even for tumors showing the presence of known (clinical and histological) risk factors for lymphogenic spread, as their positive predictive value is too low. Elective parotidectomy is individually considered as safe deep surgical margin. If elective parotidectomy is planned it should include only the superficial lobe. Completion parotidectomy and elective neck dissection are done in rare cases of histologically confirmed parotid metastasis in the parotid specimen. Preoperatively diagnosed parotid metastases without neck involvement are sent for total parotidectomy and elective selective neck dissection. Cases of clinically evident neck metastasis with no parotid involvement, are referred for comprehensive neck dissection and elective superficial parotidectomy. The treatment of concurrent parotid and cervical metastases includes total conservative parotidectomy and comprehensive neck dissection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: How common is the problem? Step 4 (Case-series) Is this diagnostic or monitoring test accurate? (Diagnosis) Step 4 (poor or non-independent reference standard) What will happen if we do not add a therapy? (Prognosis) Step 4 (Case-series) Does this intervention help? (Treatment Benefits) Step 4 (Case-series) What are the COMMON harms? (Treatment Harms) Step 4 (Case-series) What are the RARE harms? (Treatment Harms) Step 4 (Case-series) Is this (early detection) test worthwhile? (Screening) Step 4 (Case-series).
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24007812
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240423160306.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240412s2024 bl f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.bjorl.2023.101352 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)37922624
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a bl
- 100 1_
- $a Horakova, Zuzana $u University Hospital Olomouc and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry of Palacky University Olomouc, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Olomouc, Czechia
- 245 10
- $a Elective parotidectomy and neck dissection are not beneficial in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head / $c Z. Horakova, I. Starek, R. Salzman
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVE: Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma (cSCC), a tumor with a significantly increasing incidence, is mostly diagnosed in the head region, where tumors have a worse prognosis and a higher risk of metastases. The presence of metastases reduces specific five-year survival from 99% to 50%. As the risk of occult metastases does not exceed 10%, elective dissection of the tributary parotid and neck lymph nodes is not recommended. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a group of 12 patients with cSCC of the head after elective dissections of regional (parotid and cervical) nodes by means of superficial parotidectomy and selective neck dissection. RESULTS: We diagnosed occult metastases neither in the cervical nor parotid nodes in any patient. None were diagnosed as a regional recurrence during the follow-up period. CONCLUCION: Our negative opinion on elective parotidectomy and neck dissection in cSCC of the head is in agreement with the majority of published studies. These elective procedures are not indicated even for tumors showing the presence of known (clinical and histological) risk factors for lymphogenic spread, as their positive predictive value is too low. Elective parotidectomy is individually considered as safe deep surgical margin. If elective parotidectomy is planned it should include only the superficial lobe. Completion parotidectomy and elective neck dissection are done in rare cases of histologically confirmed parotid metastasis in the parotid specimen. Preoperatively diagnosed parotid metastases without neck involvement are sent for total parotidectomy and elective selective neck dissection. Cases of clinically evident neck metastasis with no parotid involvement, are referred for comprehensive neck dissection and elective superficial parotidectomy. The treatment of concurrent parotid and cervical metastases includes total conservative parotidectomy and comprehensive neck dissection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: How common is the problem? Step 4 (Case-series) Is this diagnostic or monitoring test accurate? (Diagnosis) Step 4 (poor or non-independent reference standard) What will happen if we do not add a therapy? (Prognosis) Step 4 (Case-series) Does this intervention help? (Treatment Benefits) Step 4 (Case-series) What are the COMMON harms? (Treatment Harms) Step 4 (Case-series) What are the RARE harms? (Treatment Harms) Step 4 (Case-series) Is this (early detection) test worthwhile? (Screening) Step 4 (Case-series).
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a spinocelulární karcinom $x patologie $7 D002294
- 650 _2
- $a krční disekce $x metody $7 D037981
- 650 12
- $a nádory kůže $x chirurgie $x patologie $7 D012878
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 12
- $a nádory příušní žlázy $x chirurgie $x patologie $7 D010307
- 650 _2
- $a staging nádorů $7 D009367
- 650 12
- $a nádory hlavy a krku $x chirurgie $x patologie $7 D006258
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Starek, Ivo $u University Hospital Olomouc and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry of Palacky University Olomouc, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Olomouc, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Salzman, Richard $u University Hospital Olomouc and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry of Palacky University Olomouc, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Olomouc, Czechia. Electronic address: richard.salzman@fnol.cz
- 773 0_
- $w MED00172998 $t Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology $x 1808-8686 $g Roč. 90, č. 1 (2024), s. 101352
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37922624 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240412 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240423160302 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2081670 $s 1217579
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 90 $c 1 $d 101352 $e 20231023 $i 1808-8686 $m Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology $n Braz J Otorhinolaryngol $x MED00172998
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240412