• Something wrong with this record ?

Elective parotidectomy and neck dissection are not beneficial in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head

Z. Horakova, I. Starek, R. Salzman

. 2024 ; 90 (1) : 101352. [pub] 20231023

Language English Country Brazil

Document type Journal Article

OBJECTIVE: Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma (cSCC), a tumor with a significantly increasing incidence, is mostly diagnosed in the head region, where tumors have a worse prognosis and a higher risk of metastases. The presence of metastases reduces specific five-year survival from 99% to 50%. As the risk of occult metastases does not exceed 10%, elective dissection of the tributary parotid and neck lymph nodes is not recommended. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a group of 12 patients with cSCC of the head after elective dissections of regional (parotid and cervical) nodes by means of superficial parotidectomy and selective neck dissection. RESULTS: We diagnosed occult metastases neither in the cervical nor parotid nodes in any patient. None were diagnosed as a regional recurrence during the follow-up period. CONCLUCION: Our negative opinion on elective parotidectomy and neck dissection in cSCC of the head is in agreement with the majority of published studies. These elective procedures are not indicated even for tumors showing the presence of known (clinical and histological) risk factors for lymphogenic spread, as their positive predictive value is too low. Elective parotidectomy is individually considered as safe deep surgical margin. If elective parotidectomy is planned it should include only the superficial lobe. Completion parotidectomy and elective neck dissection are done in rare cases of histologically confirmed parotid metastasis in the parotid specimen. Preoperatively diagnosed parotid metastases without neck involvement are sent for total parotidectomy and elective selective neck dissection. Cases of clinically evident neck metastasis with no parotid involvement, are referred for comprehensive neck dissection and elective superficial parotidectomy. The treatment of concurrent parotid and cervical metastases includes total conservative parotidectomy and comprehensive neck dissection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: How common is the problem? Step 4 (Case-series) Is this diagnostic or monitoring test accurate? (Diagnosis) Step 4 (poor or non-independent reference standard) What will happen if we do not add a therapy? (Prognosis) Step 4 (Case-series) Does this intervention help? (Treatment Benefits) Step 4 (Case-series) What are the COMMON harms? (Treatment Harms) Step 4 (Case-series) What are the RARE harms? (Treatment Harms) Step 4 (Case-series) Is this (early detection) test worthwhile? (Screening) Step 4 (Case-series).

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24007812
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240423160306.0
007      
ta
008      
240412s2024 bl f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.bjorl.2023.101352 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)37922624
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a bl
100    1_
$a Horakova, Zuzana $u University Hospital Olomouc and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry of Palacky University Olomouc, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Olomouc, Czechia
245    10
$a Elective parotidectomy and neck dissection are not beneficial in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head / $c Z. Horakova, I. Starek, R. Salzman
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVE: Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma (cSCC), a tumor with a significantly increasing incidence, is mostly diagnosed in the head region, where tumors have a worse prognosis and a higher risk of metastases. The presence of metastases reduces specific five-year survival from 99% to 50%. As the risk of occult metastases does not exceed 10%, elective dissection of the tributary parotid and neck lymph nodes is not recommended. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a group of 12 patients with cSCC of the head after elective dissections of regional (parotid and cervical) nodes by means of superficial parotidectomy and selective neck dissection. RESULTS: We diagnosed occult metastases neither in the cervical nor parotid nodes in any patient. None were diagnosed as a regional recurrence during the follow-up period. CONCLUCION: Our negative opinion on elective parotidectomy and neck dissection in cSCC of the head is in agreement with the majority of published studies. These elective procedures are not indicated even for tumors showing the presence of known (clinical and histological) risk factors for lymphogenic spread, as their positive predictive value is too low. Elective parotidectomy is individually considered as safe deep surgical margin. If elective parotidectomy is planned it should include only the superficial lobe. Completion parotidectomy and elective neck dissection are done in rare cases of histologically confirmed parotid metastasis in the parotid specimen. Preoperatively diagnosed parotid metastases without neck involvement are sent for total parotidectomy and elective selective neck dissection. Cases of clinically evident neck metastasis with no parotid involvement, are referred for comprehensive neck dissection and elective superficial parotidectomy. The treatment of concurrent parotid and cervical metastases includes total conservative parotidectomy and comprehensive neck dissection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: How common is the problem? Step 4 (Case-series) Is this diagnostic or monitoring test accurate? (Diagnosis) Step 4 (poor or non-independent reference standard) What will happen if we do not add a therapy? (Prognosis) Step 4 (Case-series) Does this intervention help? (Treatment Benefits) Step 4 (Case-series) What are the COMMON harms? (Treatment Harms) Step 4 (Case-series) What are the RARE harms? (Treatment Harms) Step 4 (Case-series) Is this (early detection) test worthwhile? (Screening) Step 4 (Case-series).
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a spinocelulární karcinom $x patologie $7 D002294
650    _2
$a krční disekce $x metody $7 D037981
650    12
$a nádory kůže $x chirurgie $x patologie $7 D012878
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    12
$a nádory příušní žlázy $x chirurgie $x patologie $7 D010307
650    _2
$a staging nádorů $7 D009367
650    12
$a nádory hlavy a krku $x chirurgie $x patologie $7 D006258
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Starek, Ivo $u University Hospital Olomouc and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry of Palacky University Olomouc, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Olomouc, Czechia
700    1_
$a Salzman, Richard $u University Hospital Olomouc and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry of Palacky University Olomouc, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Olomouc, Czechia. Electronic address: richard.salzman@fnol.cz
773    0_
$w MED00172998 $t Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology $x 1808-8686 $g Roč. 90, č. 1 (2024), s. 101352
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37922624 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20240412 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240423160302 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2081670 $s 1217579
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 90 $c 1 $d 101352 $e 20231023 $i 1808-8686 $m Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology $n Braz J Otorhinolaryngol $x MED00172998
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20240412

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...