Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Validity and reliability of automated treadmill six-minute walk test in patients entering exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation

M. Nevelikova, F. Dosbaba, G. Pepera, M. Felsoci, K. Batalikova, JJ. Su, L. Batalik

. 2023 ; 55 (2) : 2304664. [pub] 20240117

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc24007923

Introduction: The six-minute walk test (6MWT) is a well-established tool for assessing submaximal functional capacity for cardiac patients, but space limitations challenge its implementation. Treadmill-based (TR) 6MWT is a promising alternative, but it requires patients to complete a familiarization test to adapt treadmill speed regulation. With the advancement of sensors, it is possible to automatically control speed for individual patients and thus overcome the space limitation or the speed control difficulty on the treadmill for each patient.Methods: This study investigated the validity and interchangeability of automated speed TR6MWT and standard hallway (HL) 6MWT. Eighteen patients were assessed at baseline of the 12-week cardiac rehabilitation program. Fourteen of them were assessed after rehabilitation. All patients performed three TR6MWTs and three HL6MWTs at baseline and one of each test after the program.Results: Patients well tolerated the TR6MWT. There was a strong correlation between both test methods (r = 0.79). However, patients performed significantly better in HL6MWT (514.8m ± 59.7m) than in TR6MWT (447.2 ± 79.1m) with 95% CI, 40.4-94.6m, p < 0.05. Both tests showed high test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.86). The TR6MWT showed a valuable comparison of the effect of the cardiac rehabilitation program (20% increase, effect size 1.1) even though it is not interchangeable with the HL6MWT.Conclusion: The automated speed TR6MWT appears to be an acceptable tool with adequate validity, reliability, and responsiveness for assessing functional capacity in patients utilizing cardiac rehabilitation programs.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24007923
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240423160358.0
007      
ta
008      
240412s2023 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1080/07853890.2024.2304664 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)38233732
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Nevelikova, Marketa $u Department of Rehabilitation, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic $u Department of Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Validity and reliability of automated treadmill six-minute walk test in patients entering exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation / $c M. Nevelikova, F. Dosbaba, G. Pepera, M. Felsoci, K. Batalikova, JJ. Su, L. Batalik
520    9_
$a Introduction: The six-minute walk test (6MWT) is a well-established tool for assessing submaximal functional capacity for cardiac patients, but space limitations challenge its implementation. Treadmill-based (TR) 6MWT is a promising alternative, but it requires patients to complete a familiarization test to adapt treadmill speed regulation. With the advancement of sensors, it is possible to automatically control speed for individual patients and thus overcome the space limitation or the speed control difficulty on the treadmill for each patient.Methods: This study investigated the validity and interchangeability of automated speed TR6MWT and standard hallway (HL) 6MWT. Eighteen patients were assessed at baseline of the 12-week cardiac rehabilitation program. Fourteen of them were assessed after rehabilitation. All patients performed three TR6MWTs and three HL6MWTs at baseline and one of each test after the program.Results: Patients well tolerated the TR6MWT. There was a strong correlation between both test methods (r = 0.79). However, patients performed significantly better in HL6MWT (514.8m ± 59.7m) than in TR6MWT (447.2 ± 79.1m) with 95% CI, 40.4-94.6m, p < 0.05. Both tests showed high test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.86). The TR6MWT showed a valuable comparison of the effect of the cardiac rehabilitation program (20% increase, effect size 1.1) even though it is not interchangeable with the HL6MWT.Conclusion: The automated speed TR6MWT appears to be an acceptable tool with adequate validity, reliability, and responsiveness for assessing functional capacity in patients utilizing cardiac rehabilitation programs.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a kardiovaskulární rehabilitace $7 D000072038
650    _2
$a test chůzí $7 D000070857
650    _2
$a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
650    _2
$a zátěžový test $x metody $7 D005080
650    _2
$a chůze $x fyziologie $7 D016138
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Dosbaba, Filip $u Department of Rehabilitation, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic $u Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Pepera, Garyfallia $u Clinical Exercise Physiology and Rehabilitation Research Laboratory, Physiotherapy Department, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Lamia, Greece
700    1_
$a Felsoci, Marian $u Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Batalikova, Katerina $u Department of Rehabilitation, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Su, Jing Jing $u School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China $1 https://orcid.org/000000028242811X
700    1_
$a Batalik, Ladislav $u Department of Rehabilitation, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic $u Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00009195 $t Annals of medicine $x 1365-2060 $g Roč. 55, č. 2 (2023), s. 2304664
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38233732 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20240412 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240423160354 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2081737 $s 1217690
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 55 $c 2 $d 2304664 $e 20240117 $i 1365-2060 $m Annals of medicine $n Ann Med $x MED00009195
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20240412

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace