-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Defining oligometastatic state in uro-oncological cancers
T. Fazekas, M. Miszczyk, A. Matsukawa, P. Nyirády, SF. Shariat, P. Rajwa
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, přehledy
- MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- metastázy nádorů * MeSH
- nádory ledvin * patologie terapie MeSH
- nádory močového měchýře * patologie terapie MeSH
- nádory prostaty patologie terapie MeSH
- urologické nádory patologie terapie diagnóza MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Oligometastatic tumors illustrate a distinct state between localized and systematic disease and might harbor unique biologic features. Moreover, these tumors represent a different clinical entity, with a potential of long-term disease control or even cure, therefore they receive growing attention in the field of urologic oncology. RECENT FINDINGS: Currently, there is no consensus on the definition of oligometastatic prostate cancer, most experts limit it to a maximum of three to five lesions and involvement of no more than two organs, excluding visceral metastases. Quality data on oligometastatic bladder cancer is scarce, however, a consensus of experts defined it as a maximum of three metastatic lesions, either resectable or suitable for stereotactic therapy, without restrictions to the number of organs involved. As for kidney cancer, a maximum number of five metastases, without limitations to the location are defined as oligometastatic, with an important implication of timing of developing metastases since diagnosis of the primary tumor. SUMMARY: Defining oligometastatic state among urological tumors reflecting their distinct biological and clinical behavior is crucial to establish a sound framework for future clinical trials, and to facilitate guideline and policy formulation for improved patient care. Advancements in molecular imaging are expected to transform the field of oligometastatic urologic tumors in the future.
Centre for Translational Medicine Semmelweis University Budapest Hungary
Collegium Medicum Faculty of Medicine WSB University Dąbrowa Górnicza Poland
Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Department of Urology Medical University of Silesia Zabrze Poland
Department of Urology The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan
Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Dallas Texas USA
Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research Al Ahliyya Amman University Amman Jordan
Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology Vienna Austria
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24013377
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240905133341.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240725s2024 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001184 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)38704827
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Fazekas, Tamás $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology $u Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
- 245 10
- $a Defining oligometastatic state in uro-oncological cancers / $c T. Fazekas, M. Miszczyk, A. Matsukawa, P. Nyirády, SF. Shariat, P. Rajwa
- 520 9_
- $a PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Oligometastatic tumors illustrate a distinct state between localized and systematic disease and might harbor unique biologic features. Moreover, these tumors represent a different clinical entity, with a potential of long-term disease control or even cure, therefore they receive growing attention in the field of urologic oncology. RECENT FINDINGS: Currently, there is no consensus on the definition of oligometastatic prostate cancer, most experts limit it to a maximum of three to five lesions and involvement of no more than two organs, excluding visceral metastases. Quality data on oligometastatic bladder cancer is scarce, however, a consensus of experts defined it as a maximum of three metastatic lesions, either resectable or suitable for stereotactic therapy, without restrictions to the number of organs involved. As for kidney cancer, a maximum number of five metastases, without limitations to the location are defined as oligometastatic, with an important implication of timing of developing metastases since diagnosis of the primary tumor. SUMMARY: Defining oligometastatic state among urological tumors reflecting their distinct biological and clinical behavior is crucial to establish a sound framework for future clinical trials, and to facilitate guideline and policy formulation for improved patient care. Advancements in molecular imaging are expected to transform the field of oligometastatic urologic tumors in the future.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a metastázy nádorů $7 D009362
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 12
- $a nádory močového měchýře $x patologie $x terapie $7 D001749
- 650 12
- $a nádory ledvin $x patologie $x terapie $7 D007680
- 650 _2
- $a nádory prostaty $x patologie $x terapie $7 D011471
- 650 _2
- $a urologické nádory $x patologie $x terapie $x diagnóza $7 D014571
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Miszczyk, Marcin $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Collegium Medicum - Faculty of Medicine, WSB University, Dąbrowa Górnicza, Poland
- 700 1_
- $a Matsukawa, Akihiro $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- 700 1_
- $a Nyirády, Péter $u Department of Urology
- 700 1_
- $a Shariat, Shahrokh F $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology $u Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA $u Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $u Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan $u Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria $u Research Center for Evidence Medicine, Urology Department, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
- 700 1_
- $a Rajwa, Pawel $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001296 $t Current opinion in urology $x 1473-6586 $g Roč. 34, č. 4 (2024), s. 261-265
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38704827 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240725 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240905133335 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2143281 $s 1225243
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 34 $c 4 $d 261-265 $e 20240502 $i 1473-6586 $m Current opinion in urology $n Curr Opin Urol $x MED00001296
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240725