Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Lack of Prognostic Value of T-Wave Alternans for Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Benefit in Primary Prevention

A. Pelli, TV. Kenttä, MJ. Junttila, C. Huber, S. Schlögl, M. Zabel, M. Malik, R. Willems, MA. Vos, M. Harden, T. Friede, C. Sticherling, HV. Huikuri, EU‐CERT‐ICD Study Investigators

. 2024 ; 13 (11) : e032465. [pub] 20240528

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc24013575

BACKGROUND: New methods to identify patients who benefit from a primary prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) are needed. T-wave alternans (TWA) has been shown to associate with arrhythmogenesis of the heart and sudden cardiac death. We hypothesized that TWA might be associated with benefit from ICD implantation in primary prevention. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the EU-CERT-ICD (European Comparative Effectiveness Research to Assess the Use of Primary Prophylactic Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators) study, we prospectively enrolled 2327 candidates for primary prophylactic ICD. A 24-hour Holter monitor reading was taken from all recruited patients at enrollment. TWA was assessed from Holter monitoring using the modified moving average method. Study outcomes were all-cause death, appropriate shock, and survival benefit. TWA was assessed both as a contiguous variable and as a dichotomized variable with cutoff points <47 μV and <60 μV. The final cohort included 1734 valid T-wave alternans samples, 1211 patients with ICD, and 523 control patients with conservative treatment, with a mean follow-up time of 2.3 years. TWA ≥60 μV was a predicter for a higher all-cause death in patients with an ICD on the basis of a univariate Cox regression model (hazard ratio, 1.484 [95% CI, 1.024-2.151]; P=0.0374; concordance statistic, 0.51). In multivariable models, TWA was not prognostic of death or appropriate shocks in patients with an ICD. In addition, TWA was not prognostic of death in control patients. In a propensity score-adjusted Cox regression model, TWA was not a predictor of ICD benefit. CONCLUSIONS: T-wave alternans is poorly prognostic in patients with a primary prophylactic ICD. Although it may be prognostic of life-threatening arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death in several patient populations, it does not seem to be useful in assessing benefit from ICD therapy in primary prevention among patients with an ejection fraction of ≤35%.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24013575
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240905134251.0
007      
ta
008      
240725s2024 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1161/JAHA.123.032465 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)38804218
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Pelli, Ari $u Research Unit of Internal Medicine, Medical Research Center Oulu Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu Oulu Finland $1 https://orcid.org/0009000365362491
245    10
$a Lack of Prognostic Value of T-Wave Alternans for Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Benefit in Primary Prevention / $c A. Pelli, TV. Kenttä, MJ. Junttila, C. Huber, S. Schlögl, M. Zabel, M. Malik, R. Willems, MA. Vos, M. Harden, T. Friede, C. Sticherling, HV. Huikuri, EU‐CERT‐ICD Study Investigators
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: New methods to identify patients who benefit from a primary prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) are needed. T-wave alternans (TWA) has been shown to associate with arrhythmogenesis of the heart and sudden cardiac death. We hypothesized that TWA might be associated with benefit from ICD implantation in primary prevention. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the EU-CERT-ICD (European Comparative Effectiveness Research to Assess the Use of Primary Prophylactic Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators) study, we prospectively enrolled 2327 candidates for primary prophylactic ICD. A 24-hour Holter monitor reading was taken from all recruited patients at enrollment. TWA was assessed from Holter monitoring using the modified moving average method. Study outcomes were all-cause death, appropriate shock, and survival benefit. TWA was assessed both as a contiguous variable and as a dichotomized variable with cutoff points <47 μV and <60 μV. The final cohort included 1734 valid T-wave alternans samples, 1211 patients with ICD, and 523 control patients with conservative treatment, with a mean follow-up time of 2.3 years. TWA ≥60 μV was a predicter for a higher all-cause death in patients with an ICD on the basis of a univariate Cox regression model (hazard ratio, 1.484 [95% CI, 1.024-2.151]; P=0.0374; concordance statistic, 0.51). In multivariable models, TWA was not prognostic of death or appropriate shocks in patients with an ICD. In addition, TWA was not prognostic of death in control patients. In a propensity score-adjusted Cox regression model, TWA was not a predictor of ICD benefit. CONCLUSIONS: T-wave alternans is poorly prognostic in patients with a primary prophylactic ICD. Although it may be prognostic of life-threatening arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death in several patient populations, it does not seem to be useful in assessing benefit from ICD therapy in primary prevention among patients with an ejection fraction of ≤35%.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a defibrilátory implantabilní $7 D017147
650    12
$a primární prevence $x metody $7 D011322
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    12
$a náhlá srdeční smrt $x prevence a kontrola $x etiologie $7 D016757
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    12
$a elektrokardiografie ambulantní $x metody $7 D015716
650    _2
$a elektrická defibrilace $x přístrojové vybavení $x škodlivé účinky $7 D004554
650    _2
$a hodnocení rizik $x metody $7 D018570
650    _2
$a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
650    _2
$a srdeční arytmie $x terapie $x patofyziologie $x diagnóza $x prevence a kontrola $x mortalita $7 D001145
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    _2
$a prediktivní hodnota testů $7 D011237
650    _2
$a časové faktory $7 D013997
650    _2
$a prognóza $7 D011379
650    _2
$a srdeční frekvence $x fyziologie $7 D006339
651    _2
$a Evropa $x epidemiologie $7 D005060
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
700    1_
$a Kenttä, Tuomas V $u Research Unit of Internal Medicine, Medical Research Center Oulu Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu Oulu Finland
700    1_
$a Junttila, M Juhani $u Research Unit of Internal Medicine, Medical Research Center Oulu Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu Oulu Finland $u Biocenter Oulu University of Oulu Oulu Finland $1 https://orcid.org/0000000288961281
700    1_
$a Huber, Cynthia $u Division of Cardiology University Medical Center Göttingen Heart Center Göttingen Germany $1 https://orcid.org/0000000320353682
700    1_
$a Schlögl, Simon $u Division of Cardiology University Medical Center Göttingen Heart Center Göttingen Germany $u DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research) partner site Göttingen Göttingen Germany $1 https://orcid.org/0000000196471058
700    1_
$a Zabel, Markus $u Division of Cardiology University Medical Center Göttingen Heart Center Göttingen Germany $u DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research) partner site Göttingen Göttingen Germany $1 https://orcid.org/0000000308954602
700    1_
$a Malik, Marek $u National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London United Kingdom $u Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Willems, Rik $u Department of Cardiovascular Sciences University of Leuven and University Hospitals Leuven Leuven Belgium $1 https://orcid.org/0000000254699609
700    1_
$a Vos, Marc A $u Medical Physiology University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht Netherlands $1 https://orcid.org/0000000255014616
700    1_
$a Harden, Markus $u Department of Medical Statistics University Medical Center Göttingen Göttingen Germany
700    1_
$a Friede, Tim $u Department of Medical Statistics University Medical Center Göttingen Göttingen Germany $u DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research) partner site Göttingen Göttingen Germany $1 https://orcid.org/0000000153477441
700    1_
$a Sticherling, Christian $u Division of Cardiology University Hospital Basel Basel Switzerland $1 https://orcid.org/0000000184287050
700    1_
$a Huikuri, Heikki V $u Research Unit of Internal Medicine, Medical Research Center Oulu Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu Oulu Finland $1 https://orcid.org/000000018800963X
710    2_
$a EU‐CERT‐ICD Study Investigators
773    0_
$w MED00188127 $t Journal of the American Heart Association $x 2047-9980 $g Roč. 13, č. 11 (2024), s. e032465
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38804218 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20240725 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240905134245 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2143401 $s 1225441
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 13 $c 11 $d e032465 $e 20240528 $i 2047-9980 $m Journal of the American Heart Association $n J Am Heart Assoc $x MED00188127
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20240725

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...