-
Something wrong with this record ?
Lack of Prognostic Value of T-Wave Alternans for Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Benefit in Primary Prevention
A. Pelli, TV. Kenttä, MJ. Junttila, C. Huber, S. Schlögl, M. Zabel, M. Malik, R. Willems, MA. Vos, M. Harden, T. Friede, C. Sticherling, HV. Huikuri, EU‐CERT‐ICD Study Investigators
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Multicenter Study
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2012
Free Medical Journals
from 2012
PubMed Central
from 2012
Europe PubMed Central
from 2012
Open Access Digital Library
from 2012-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2012-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2015-01-01
Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles
from 2012
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2012
- MeSH
- Time Factors MeSH
- Defibrillators, Implantable * MeSH
- Electric Countershock instrumentation adverse effects MeSH
- Electrocardiography, Ambulatory * methods MeSH
- Risk Assessment methods MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Death, Sudden, Cardiac * prevention & control etiology MeSH
- Predictive Value of Tests MeSH
- Primary Prevention * methods MeSH
- Prognosis MeSH
- Prospective Studies MeSH
- Risk Factors MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Arrhythmias, Cardiac therapy physiopathology diagnosis prevention & control mortality MeSH
- Heart Rate physiology MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
- Geographicals
- Europe MeSH
BACKGROUND: New methods to identify patients who benefit from a primary prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) are needed. T-wave alternans (TWA) has been shown to associate with arrhythmogenesis of the heart and sudden cardiac death. We hypothesized that TWA might be associated with benefit from ICD implantation in primary prevention. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the EU-CERT-ICD (European Comparative Effectiveness Research to Assess the Use of Primary Prophylactic Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators) study, we prospectively enrolled 2327 candidates for primary prophylactic ICD. A 24-hour Holter monitor reading was taken from all recruited patients at enrollment. TWA was assessed from Holter monitoring using the modified moving average method. Study outcomes were all-cause death, appropriate shock, and survival benefit. TWA was assessed both as a contiguous variable and as a dichotomized variable with cutoff points <47 μV and <60 μV. The final cohort included 1734 valid T-wave alternans samples, 1211 patients with ICD, and 523 control patients with conservative treatment, with a mean follow-up time of 2.3 years. TWA ≥60 μV was a predicter for a higher all-cause death in patients with an ICD on the basis of a univariate Cox regression model (hazard ratio, 1.484 [95% CI, 1.024-2.151]; P=0.0374; concordance statistic, 0.51). In multivariable models, TWA was not prognostic of death or appropriate shocks in patients with an ICD. In addition, TWA was not prognostic of death in control patients. In a propensity score-adjusted Cox regression model, TWA was not a predictor of ICD benefit. CONCLUSIONS: T-wave alternans is poorly prognostic in patients with a primary prophylactic ICD. Although it may be prognostic of life-threatening arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death in several patient populations, it does not seem to be useful in assessing benefit from ICD therapy in primary prevention among patients with an ejection fraction of ≤35%.
Biocenter Oulu University of Oulu Oulu Finland
Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Department of Medical Statistics University Medical Center Göttingen Göttingen Germany
Division of Cardiology University Hospital Basel Basel Switzerland
Division of Cardiology University Medical Center Göttingen Heart Center Göttingen Germany
DZHK partner site Göttingen Göttingen Germany
Medical Physiology University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht Netherlands
National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College London United Kingdom
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24013575
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240905134251.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240725s2024 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1161/JAHA.123.032465 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)38804218
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Pelli, Ari $u Research Unit of Internal Medicine, Medical Research Center Oulu Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu Oulu Finland $1 https://orcid.org/0009000365362491
- 245 10
- $a Lack of Prognostic Value of T-Wave Alternans for Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Benefit in Primary Prevention / $c A. Pelli, TV. Kenttä, MJ. Junttila, C. Huber, S. Schlögl, M. Zabel, M. Malik, R. Willems, MA. Vos, M. Harden, T. Friede, C. Sticherling, HV. Huikuri, EU‐CERT‐ICD Study Investigators
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: New methods to identify patients who benefit from a primary prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) are needed. T-wave alternans (TWA) has been shown to associate with arrhythmogenesis of the heart and sudden cardiac death. We hypothesized that TWA might be associated with benefit from ICD implantation in primary prevention. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the EU-CERT-ICD (European Comparative Effectiveness Research to Assess the Use of Primary Prophylactic Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators) study, we prospectively enrolled 2327 candidates for primary prophylactic ICD. A 24-hour Holter monitor reading was taken from all recruited patients at enrollment. TWA was assessed from Holter monitoring using the modified moving average method. Study outcomes were all-cause death, appropriate shock, and survival benefit. TWA was assessed both as a contiguous variable and as a dichotomized variable with cutoff points <47 μV and <60 μV. The final cohort included 1734 valid T-wave alternans samples, 1211 patients with ICD, and 523 control patients with conservative treatment, with a mean follow-up time of 2.3 years. TWA ≥60 μV was a predicter for a higher all-cause death in patients with an ICD on the basis of a univariate Cox regression model (hazard ratio, 1.484 [95% CI, 1.024-2.151]; P=0.0374; concordance statistic, 0.51). In multivariable models, TWA was not prognostic of death or appropriate shocks in patients with an ICD. In addition, TWA was not prognostic of death in control patients. In a propensity score-adjusted Cox regression model, TWA was not a predictor of ICD benefit. CONCLUSIONS: T-wave alternans is poorly prognostic in patients with a primary prophylactic ICD. Although it may be prognostic of life-threatening arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death in several patient populations, it does not seem to be useful in assessing benefit from ICD therapy in primary prevention among patients with an ejection fraction of ≤35%.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a defibrilátory implantabilní $7 D017147
- 650 12
- $a primární prevence $x metody $7 D011322
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 12
- $a náhlá srdeční smrt $x prevence a kontrola $x etiologie $7 D016757
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 650 12
- $a elektrokardiografie ambulantní $x metody $7 D015716
- 650 _2
- $a elektrická defibrilace $x přístrojové vybavení $x škodlivé účinky $7 D004554
- 650 _2
- $a hodnocení rizik $x metody $7 D018570
- 650 _2
- $a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
- 650 _2
- $a srdeční arytmie $x terapie $x patofyziologie $x diagnóza $x prevence a kontrola $x mortalita $7 D001145
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a prediktivní hodnota testů $7 D011237
- 650 _2
- $a časové faktory $7 D013997
- 650 _2
- $a prognóza $7 D011379
- 650 _2
- $a srdeční frekvence $x fyziologie $7 D006339
- 651 _2
- $a Evropa $x epidemiologie $7 D005060
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
- 700 1_
- $a Kenttä, Tuomas V $u Research Unit of Internal Medicine, Medical Research Center Oulu Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu Oulu Finland
- 700 1_
- $a Junttila, M Juhani $u Research Unit of Internal Medicine, Medical Research Center Oulu Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu Oulu Finland $u Biocenter Oulu University of Oulu Oulu Finland $1 https://orcid.org/0000000288961281
- 700 1_
- $a Huber, Cynthia $u Division of Cardiology University Medical Center Göttingen Heart Center Göttingen Germany $1 https://orcid.org/0000000320353682
- 700 1_
- $a Schlögl, Simon $u Division of Cardiology University Medical Center Göttingen Heart Center Göttingen Germany $u DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research) partner site Göttingen Göttingen Germany $1 https://orcid.org/0000000196471058
- 700 1_
- $a Zabel, Markus $u Division of Cardiology University Medical Center Göttingen Heart Center Göttingen Germany $u DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research) partner site Göttingen Göttingen Germany $1 https://orcid.org/0000000308954602
- 700 1_
- $a Malik, Marek $u National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London United Kingdom $u Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Willems, Rik $u Department of Cardiovascular Sciences University of Leuven and University Hospitals Leuven Leuven Belgium $1 https://orcid.org/0000000254699609
- 700 1_
- $a Vos, Marc A $u Medical Physiology University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht Netherlands $1 https://orcid.org/0000000255014616
- 700 1_
- $a Harden, Markus $u Department of Medical Statistics University Medical Center Göttingen Göttingen Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Friede, Tim $u Department of Medical Statistics University Medical Center Göttingen Göttingen Germany $u DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research) partner site Göttingen Göttingen Germany $1 https://orcid.org/0000000153477441
- 700 1_
- $a Sticherling, Christian $u Division of Cardiology University Hospital Basel Basel Switzerland $1 https://orcid.org/0000000184287050
- 700 1_
- $a Huikuri, Heikki V $u Research Unit of Internal Medicine, Medical Research Center Oulu Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu Oulu Finland $1 https://orcid.org/000000018800963X
- 710 2_
- $a EU‐CERT‐ICD Study Investigators
- 773 0_
- $w MED00188127 $t Journal of the American Heart Association $x 2047-9980 $g Roč. 13, č. 11 (2024), s. e032465
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38804218 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240725 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240905134245 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2143401 $s 1225441
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 13 $c 11 $d e032465 $e 20240528 $i 2047-9980 $m Journal of the American Heart Association $n J Am Heart Assoc $x MED00188127
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240725