-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Impact of disease volume on survival efficacy of triplet therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis
A. Matsukawa, P. Rajwa, T. Kawada, K. Bekku, E. Laukhtina, J. Klemm, B. Pradere, K. Mori, PI. Karakiewicz, T. Kimura, P. Chlosta, SF. Shariat, T. Yanagisawa
Jazyk angličtina Země Japonsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, metaanalýza, systematický přehled
NLK
ProQuest Central
od 1997-03-01 do Před 1 rokem
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2003-02-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 1997-03-01 do Před 1 rokem
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
od 1997-03-01 do Před 1 rokem
- MeSH
- antagonisté androgenních receptorů terapeutické užití MeSH
- antagonisté androgenů * terapeutické užití MeSH
- docetaxel * terapeutické užití aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory prostaty * farmakoterapie mortalita patologie MeSH
- protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie * terapeutické užití MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma MeSH
- síťová metaanalýza * MeSH
- tumor burden MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- metaanalýza MeSH
- systematický přehled MeSH
BACKGROUND: Triplet therapy, androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) plus docetaxel plus androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), is a novel guideline-recommended treatment for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). However, the optimal selection of the patient most likely to benefit from triplet therapy remains unclear. METHODS: We performed a systematic review, meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis to assess the oncologic benefit of triplet therapy in mHSPC patients stratified by disease volume and compare them with doublet treatment regimens. Three databases and meeting abstracts were queried in March 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating patients treated with systemic therapy for mHSPC stratified by disease volume. Primary interests of measure were overall survival (OS). We followed the PRISMA guideline and AMSTAR2 checklist. RESULTS: Overall, eight RCTs were included for meta-analyses and network meta-analyses (NMAs). Triplet therapy outperformed docetaxel plus ADT in terms of OS in both patients with high-(pooled HR: 0.73, 95%CI 0.64-0.84) and low-volume mHSPC (pooled HR: 0.71, 95%CI 0.52-0.97). There was no statistically significant difference between patients with low- vs. high-volume in terms of OS benefit from adding ARSI to docetaxel plus ADT (p = 0.9). Analysis of treatment rankings showed that darolutamide plus docetaxel plus ADT (90%) had the highest likelihood of improved OS in patients with high-volume disease, while enzalutamide plus ADT (84%) had the highest in with low-volume disease. CONCLUSIONS: Triplet therapy improves OS in mHSPC patients compared to docetaxel-based doublet therapy, irrespective of disease volume. However, based on treatment ranking, triplet therapy should preferably be considered for patients with high-volume mHSPC while those with low-volume are likely to be adequately treated with ARSI + ADT.
Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Department of Urology Jagiellonian University Medical College Krakow Poland
Department of Urology La Croix Du Sud Hospital Quint Fonsegrives France
Department of Urology Medical University of Silesia Zabrze Poland
Department of Urology The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan
Department of Urology University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas TX USA
Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY USA
Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research Al Ahliyya Amman University Amman Jordan
Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health Sechenov University Moscow Russia
Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology Vienna Austria
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24013709
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240905133824.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240725s2024 ja f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s10147-024-02485-4 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)38582807
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ja
- 100 1_
- $a Matsukawa, Akihiro $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan $1 https://orcid.org/000000023324762X
- 245 10
- $a Impact of disease volume on survival efficacy of triplet therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis / $c A. Matsukawa, P. Rajwa, T. Kawada, K. Bekku, E. Laukhtina, J. Klemm, B. Pradere, K. Mori, PI. Karakiewicz, T. Kimura, P. Chlosta, SF. Shariat, T. Yanagisawa
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Triplet therapy, androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) plus docetaxel plus androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), is a novel guideline-recommended treatment for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). However, the optimal selection of the patient most likely to benefit from triplet therapy remains unclear. METHODS: We performed a systematic review, meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis to assess the oncologic benefit of triplet therapy in mHSPC patients stratified by disease volume and compare them with doublet treatment regimens. Three databases and meeting abstracts were queried in March 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating patients treated with systemic therapy for mHSPC stratified by disease volume. Primary interests of measure were overall survival (OS). We followed the PRISMA guideline and AMSTAR2 checklist. RESULTS: Overall, eight RCTs were included for meta-analyses and network meta-analyses (NMAs). Triplet therapy outperformed docetaxel plus ADT in terms of OS in both patients with high-(pooled HR: 0.73, 95%CI 0.64-0.84) and low-volume mHSPC (pooled HR: 0.71, 95%CI 0.52-0.97). There was no statistically significant difference between patients with low- vs. high-volume in terms of OS benefit from adding ARSI to docetaxel plus ADT (p = 0.9). Analysis of treatment rankings showed that darolutamide plus docetaxel plus ADT (90%) had the highest likelihood of improved OS in patients with high-volume disease, while enzalutamide plus ADT (84%) had the highest in with low-volume disease. CONCLUSIONS: Triplet therapy improves OS in mHSPC patients compared to docetaxel-based doublet therapy, irrespective of disease volume. However, based on treatment ranking, triplet therapy should preferably be considered for patients with high-volume mHSPC while those with low-volume are likely to be adequately treated with ARSI + ADT.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 12
- $a antagonisté androgenů $x terapeutické užití $7 D000726
- 650 _2
- $a antagonisté androgenních receptorů $x terapeutické užití $7 D059002
- 650 12
- $a protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie $x terapeutické užití $7 D000971
- 650 12
- $a docetaxel $x terapeutické užití $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D000077143
- 650 12
- $a síťová metaanalýza $7 D000071076
- 650 12
- $a nádory prostaty $x farmakoterapie $x mortalita $x patologie $7 D011471
- 650 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma $7 D016032
- 650 _2
- $a tumor burden $7 D047368
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a metaanalýza $7 D017418
- 655 _2
- $a systematický přehled $7 D000078182
- 700 1_
- $a Rajwa, Pawel $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
- 700 1_
- $a Kawada, Tatsushi $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
- 700 1_
- $a Bekku, Kensuke $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
- 700 1_
- $a Laukhtina, Ekaterina $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria $u Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
- 700 1_
- $a Klemm, Jakob $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Pradere, Benjamin $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
- 700 1_
- $a Mori, Keiichiro $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- 700 1_
- $a Karakiewicz, Pierre I $u Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada
- 700 1_
- $a Kimura, Takahiro $u Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- 700 1_
- $a Chlosta, Piotr $u Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University, Medical College, Krakow, Poland
- 700 1_
- $a Shariat, Shahrokh F $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. shahrokh.shariat@meduniwien.ac.at $u Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia. shahrokh.shariat@meduniwien.ac.at $u Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan. shahrokh.shariat@meduniwien.ac.at $u Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. shahrokh.shariat@meduniwien.ac.at $u Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. shahrokh.shariat@meduniwien.ac.at $u Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA. shahrokh.shariat@meduniwien.ac.at $u Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria. shahrokh.shariat@meduniwien.ac.at
- 700 1_
- $a Yanagisawa, Takafumi $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- 773 0_
- $w MED00005747 $t International journal of clinical oncology $x 1437-7772 $g Roč. 29, č. 6 (2024), s. 716-725
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38582807 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240725 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240905133818 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2143482 $s 1225575
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 29 $c 6 $d 716-725 $e 20240406 $i 1437-7772 $m International journal of clinical oncology $n Int J Clin Oncol $x MED00005747
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240725